The right to be forgotten in data protection law and two Western cultures of privacy
The right to be forgotten in data protection law and two Western cultures of privacy
Data protection law has emerged as an important bulwark against online privacy intrusions, and yet its status within privacy law remains awkward. Its starting point of protecting ‘personal’ rather than ‘private’ information puts it at odds with privacy more generally. Indeed, in its very design, data protection law caters for the protection of public personal information, or personal information which has attained a degree of publicness through disclosure. Building on James Whitman's comparative privacy study, this article argues that data protection law is not the odd bedfellow of privacy law properly so called but may be understood as a manifestation of the Continental European culture of privacy. Its distinctiveness does not lie in its apparent technicality but in its robust openness to privacy in public—an idea that is alien to the Anglo-American culture of privacy. Whilst these two cultures of privacy have long ‘met’ in different jurisdictions, this article locates their enduring influence and antagonism within three contemporary privacy regimes. By taking the right to be forgotten, as an archetypal privacy-in-public right, in the testing context of spent criminal convictions, the article gauges the comparative openness to such claims, first, of the Court of Justice of the European Union as the authoritative voice on General Data Protection Regulation normativity; secondly, of the US judiciary as committed to the First and Fourth Amendment; and, thirdly, of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its fused Anglo-American and Continental European privacy jurisprudence. It is the latter jurisprudence in particular that highlights the tensions arising from trying to marry the two privacy traditions, or merge data protection and ‘privacy’ law. Yet, these tensions also offer insights and opportunities.
human rights, Privacy, data protection, European Convention of Human Rights, right to be forgotten, GDPR, Fourth Amendment, Comparative law, General Data Protection Regulation, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), comparative law, data protection law, privacy
737-769
Kohl, Uta
813ff335-441f-4027-801b-4e6fc48409c3
31 July 2023
Kohl, Uta
813ff335-441f-4027-801b-4e6fc48409c3
Kohl, Uta
(2023)
The right to be forgotten in data protection law and two Western cultures of privacy.
International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 72 (3), .
(doi:10.1017/S0020589323000258).
Abstract
Data protection law has emerged as an important bulwark against online privacy intrusions, and yet its status within privacy law remains awkward. Its starting point of protecting ‘personal’ rather than ‘private’ information puts it at odds with privacy more generally. Indeed, in its very design, data protection law caters for the protection of public personal information, or personal information which has attained a degree of publicness through disclosure. Building on James Whitman's comparative privacy study, this article argues that data protection law is not the odd bedfellow of privacy law properly so called but may be understood as a manifestation of the Continental European culture of privacy. Its distinctiveness does not lie in its apparent technicality but in its robust openness to privacy in public—an idea that is alien to the Anglo-American culture of privacy. Whilst these two cultures of privacy have long ‘met’ in different jurisdictions, this article locates their enduring influence and antagonism within three contemporary privacy regimes. By taking the right to be forgotten, as an archetypal privacy-in-public right, in the testing context of spent criminal convictions, the article gauges the comparative openness to such claims, first, of the Court of Justice of the European Union as the authoritative voice on General Data Protection Regulation normativity; secondly, of the US judiciary as committed to the First and Fourth Amendment; and, thirdly, of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its fused Anglo-American and Continental European privacy jurisprudence. It is the latter jurisprudence in particular that highlights the tensions arising from trying to marry the two privacy traditions, or merge data protection and ‘privacy’ law. Yet, these tensions also offer insights and opportunities.
Text
Clean Final Paper on Information Privacy
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
the-right-to-be-forgotten-in-data-protection-law-and-two-western-cultures-of-privacy
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 25 January 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 July 2023
Published date: 31 July 2023
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).
Keywords:
human rights, Privacy, data protection, European Convention of Human Rights, right to be forgotten, GDPR, Fourth Amendment, Comparative law, General Data Protection Regulation, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), comparative law, data protection law, privacy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 473718
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473718
ISSN: 0020-5893
PURE UUID: d1b6c64d-ae94-41b4-bb7c-47043f123e3d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Jan 2023 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:54
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics