National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on myocardial revascularisation
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on myocardial revascularisation
Cardiologists in the UK predominantly use the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology guidelines to help guide decision-making. This article will appraise the current recommendations from NICE regarding myocardial revascularisation and compare them with other major international guidelines. While there are many similarities, subtle differences exist. These differences arise in part due to the evidence base at time of publication, as well as from the different healthcare systems that they are designed for, and from the cost-effectiveness models that dominate the methodology used by NICE. The clinical implications of the differences between the international guidelines will be analysed.
Angina Pectoris, Myocardial Infarction, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
1054-1063
Jabbour, Richard J.
9268c6b6-c7b3-48c6-b617-b50899c0eabc
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
1 July 2023
Jabbour, Richard J.
9268c6b6-c7b3-48c6-b617-b50899c0eabc
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Jabbour, Richard J. and Curzen, Nick
(2023)
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on myocardial revascularisation.
Heart, 109 (14), .
(doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321397).
Abstract
Cardiologists in the UK predominantly use the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology guidelines to help guide decision-making. This article will appraise the current recommendations from NICE regarding myocardial revascularisation and compare them with other major international guidelines. While there are many similarities, subtle differences exist. These differences arise in part due to the evidence base at time of publication, as well as from the different healthcare systems that they are designed for, and from the cost-effectiveness models that dominate the methodology used by NICE. The clinical implications of the differences between the international guidelines will be analysed.
Text
Main document resubmission - clean
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 December 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 January 2023
Published date: 1 July 2023
Keywords:
Angina Pectoris, Myocardial Infarction, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 474837
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474837
ISSN: 1355-6037
PURE UUID: cc0d120d-5f5a-49ce-96b4-fd3f431502f3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Mar 2023 17:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Richard J. Jabbour
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
