The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A critical evaluation of the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures assessing health-related quality of life in children with cancer: a systematic review

A critical evaluation of the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures assessing health-related quality of life in children with cancer: a systematic review
A critical evaluation of the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures assessing health-related quality of life in children with cancer: a systematic review

Background: with increasing survival rates in pediatric oncology, the need to monitor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is becoming even more important. However, available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been criticized. This review aims to systematically evaluate the content validity of PROMs for HRQOL in children with cancer. 

Methods:in December 2021, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed. PROMs were included if they were used to assess HRQOL in children with cancer and had a lower age-limit between 8 and 12 years and an upper age-limit below 21 years. The COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs was applied to grade evidence for relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility based on quality ratings of development studies (i.e., studies related to concept elicitation and cognitive interviews for newly developed questionnaires) and content validity studies (i.e., qualitative studies in new samples to evaluate the content validity of existing questionnaires). 

Results: twelve PROMs were included. Due to insufficient patient involvement and/or poor reporting, the quality of most development studies was rated ‘doubtful’ or ‘inadequate’. Few content validity studies were available, and these were mostly ‘inadequate’. Following the COSMIN methodology, evidence for content validity was ‘low’ or ‘very low’ for almost all PROMs. Only the PROMIS Pediatric Profile had ‘moderate’ evidence. In general, the results indicated that the PROMs covered relevant issues, while results for comprehensiveness and comprehensibility were partly inconsistent or insufficient. 

Discussion: following the COSMIN methodology, there is scarce evidence for the content validity of available PROMs for HRQOL in children with cancer. Most instruments were developed before the publication of milestone guidelines and therefore were not able to fulfill all requirements. Efforts are needed to catch up with methodological progress made during the last decade. Further research should adhere to recent guidelines to develop new instruments and to strengthen the evidence for existing PROMs.

Rothmund, Maria
874c229d-a404-4eff-9281-d9ad7eb2c902
Meryk, Andreas
cf3292aa-e797-4a8c-bf50-245bbaf565d1
Rumpold, Gerhard
9b6a8395-a689-4ad8-8f3b-bc4c55952af7
Crazzolara, Roman
2ae764da-3ca6-41ca-959d-6a71411289d7
Sodergren, Samantha
d66fc3fa-2c98-403d-8ae5-410ef95de46e
Darlington, Anne-sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Riedl, David
dd01d4ed-3140-4f77-9923-883a04a4c136
Rothmund, Maria
874c229d-a404-4eff-9281-d9ad7eb2c902
Meryk, Andreas
cf3292aa-e797-4a8c-bf50-245bbaf565d1
Rumpold, Gerhard
9b6a8395-a689-4ad8-8f3b-bc4c55952af7
Crazzolara, Roman
2ae764da-3ca6-41ca-959d-6a71411289d7
Sodergren, Samantha
d66fc3fa-2c98-403d-8ae5-410ef95de46e
Darlington, Anne-sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Riedl, David
dd01d4ed-3140-4f77-9923-883a04a4c136

Rothmund, Maria, Meryk, Andreas, Rumpold, Gerhard, Crazzolara, Roman, Sodergren, Samantha, Darlington, Anne-sophie and Riedl, David (2023) A critical evaluation of the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures assessing health-related quality of life in children with cancer: a systematic review. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7 (1), [2]. (doi:10.1186/s41687-023-00540-8).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: with increasing survival rates in pediatric oncology, the need to monitor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is becoming even more important. However, available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been criticized. This review aims to systematically evaluate the content validity of PROMs for HRQOL in children with cancer. 

Methods:in December 2021, a systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed. PROMs were included if they were used to assess HRQOL in children with cancer and had a lower age-limit between 8 and 12 years and an upper age-limit below 21 years. The COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs was applied to grade evidence for relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility based on quality ratings of development studies (i.e., studies related to concept elicitation and cognitive interviews for newly developed questionnaires) and content validity studies (i.e., qualitative studies in new samples to evaluate the content validity of existing questionnaires). 

Results: twelve PROMs were included. Due to insufficient patient involvement and/or poor reporting, the quality of most development studies was rated ‘doubtful’ or ‘inadequate’. Few content validity studies were available, and these were mostly ‘inadequate’. Following the COSMIN methodology, evidence for content validity was ‘low’ or ‘very low’ for almost all PROMs. Only the PROMIS Pediatric Profile had ‘moderate’ evidence. In general, the results indicated that the PROMs covered relevant issues, while results for comprehensiveness and comprehensibility were partly inconsistent or insufficient. 

Discussion: following the COSMIN methodology, there is scarce evidence for the content validity of available PROMs for HRQOL in children with cancer. Most instruments were developed before the publication of milestone guidelines and therefore were not able to fulfill all requirements. Efforts are needed to catch up with methodological progress made during the last decade. Further research should adhere to recent guidelines to develop new instruments and to strengthen the evidence for existing PROMs.

Text
A Critical Evaluation of the Content Validity - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (692kB)
Text
s41687-023-00540-8 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 January 2023
Published date: 19 January 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: This study was supported by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group (EORTC QLG). The grant (no. 002–2020) was awarded to David Riedl and Samantha Sodergren. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 474983
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/474983
PURE UUID: fc4f4005-bf80-4a6e-aec4-f61fb18961d9
ORCID for Samantha Sodergren: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-146X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Mar 2023 17:42
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Maria Rothmund
Author: Andreas Meryk
Author: Gerhard Rumpold
Author: Roman Crazzolara
Author: David Riedl

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×