The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure

Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure
Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure

Background: Mortality, morbidity, and organ failure are important and common serious harms after surgery. However, there are many candidate measures to describe these outcome domains. Definitions of these measures are highly variable, and validity is often unclear. As part of the International Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative, this study aimed to derive a set of standardised and valid measures of mortality, morbidity, and organ failure for use in perioperative clinical trials. Methods: Three domains of endpoints (mortality, morbidity, and organ failure) were explored through systematic literature review and a three-stage Delphi consensus process using methods consistently applied across the StEP initiative. Reliability, feasibility, and patient-centredness were assessed in round 3 of the consensus process. Results: A high level of consensus was achieved for two mortality time points, 30-day and 1-yr mortality, and these two measures are recommended. No organ failure endpoints achieved threshold criteria for consensus recommendation. The Clavien–Dindo classification of complications achieved threshold criteria for consensus in round 2 of the Delphi process but did not achieve the threshold criteria in round 3 where it scored equivalently to the Post Operative Morbidity Survey. Clavien–Dindo therefore received conditional endorsement as the most widely used measure. No composite measures of organ failure achieved an acceptable level of consensus. Conclusions: Both 30-day and 1-yr mortality measures are recommended. No measure is recommended for organ failure. One measure (Clavien–Dindo) is conditionally endorsed for postoperative morbidity, but our findings suggest that no single endpoint offers a reliable and valid measure to describe perioperative morbidity that is not dependent on the quality of deli-vered care. Further refinement of current measures, or development of novel measures, of postoperative morbidity might improve consensus in this area.

anaesthesia, consensus, morbidity, mortality, organ failure, perioperative outcomes, postoperative morbidity, surgery
0007-0912
404-411
Jackson, Sandy
9bbcdd0e-a9c8-46d3-945c-53e9262c4f4c
Boney, Oliver
83b255f2-d5bc-4224-bde7-ed8aa11191b1
Pearse, Rupert
50f634bc-77c8-4f69-8650-e2b0a29ceaed
Kurz, Andrea
48b45843-6dc9-4884-b406-ee595cf5d506
Cooper, D. James
670d7ed1-277c-4815-b6b5-05bf669d9aae
van Klei, Wilton A.
a72439a8-bd20-4057-b181-db316c788acd
Cabrini, Luca
31f70f67-8c61-436e-b5bc-31911b2833b7
Miller, Timothy E.
2a1e1b50-a4dd-4608-a67c-7a4669d88617
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
117f1e9b-1a63-4be2-b41c-e95dda807271
Myles, Paul
3c704c43-b054-4e46-9dd0-c383c295b686
Grocott, Michael P.W.
1e87b741-513e-4a22-be13-0f7bb344e8c2
Johnson, Mark
24f82215-2301-4151-a4a1-9b440faecc3e
et al.
The StEP-COMPACGroup
Jackson, Sandy
9bbcdd0e-a9c8-46d3-945c-53e9262c4f4c
Boney, Oliver
83b255f2-d5bc-4224-bde7-ed8aa11191b1
Pearse, Rupert
50f634bc-77c8-4f69-8650-e2b0a29ceaed
Kurz, Andrea
48b45843-6dc9-4884-b406-ee595cf5d506
Cooper, D. James
670d7ed1-277c-4815-b6b5-05bf669d9aae
van Klei, Wilton A.
a72439a8-bd20-4057-b181-db316c788acd
Cabrini, Luca
31f70f67-8c61-436e-b5bc-31911b2833b7
Miller, Timothy E.
2a1e1b50-a4dd-4608-a67c-7a4669d88617
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
117f1e9b-1a63-4be2-b41c-e95dda807271
Myles, Paul
3c704c43-b054-4e46-9dd0-c383c295b686
Grocott, Michael P.W.
1e87b741-513e-4a22-be13-0f7bb344e8c2
Johnson, Mark
24f82215-2301-4151-a4a1-9b440faecc3e

Jackson, Sandy, Boney, Oliver, Pearse, Rupert, Kurz, Andrea, Cooper, D. James and van Klei, Wilton A. , et al. and The StEP-COMPACGroup (2023) Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 130 (4), 404-411. (doi:10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.012).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Mortality, morbidity, and organ failure are important and common serious harms after surgery. However, there are many candidate measures to describe these outcome domains. Definitions of these measures are highly variable, and validity is often unclear. As part of the International Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative, this study aimed to derive a set of standardised and valid measures of mortality, morbidity, and organ failure for use in perioperative clinical trials. Methods: Three domains of endpoints (mortality, morbidity, and organ failure) were explored through systematic literature review and a three-stage Delphi consensus process using methods consistently applied across the StEP initiative. Reliability, feasibility, and patient-centredness were assessed in round 3 of the consensus process. Results: A high level of consensus was achieved for two mortality time points, 30-day and 1-yr mortality, and these two measures are recommended. No organ failure endpoints achieved threshold criteria for consensus recommendation. The Clavien–Dindo classification of complications achieved threshold criteria for consensus in round 2 of the Delphi process but did not achieve the threshold criteria in round 3 where it scored equivalently to the Post Operative Morbidity Survey. Clavien–Dindo therefore received conditional endorsement as the most widely used measure. No composite measures of organ failure achieved an acceptable level of consensus. Conclusions: Both 30-day and 1-yr mortality measures are recommended. No measure is recommended for organ failure. One measure (Clavien–Dindo) is conditionally endorsed for postoperative morbidity, but our findings suggest that no single endpoint offers a reliable and valid measure to describe perioperative morbidity that is not dependent on the quality of deli-vered care. Further refinement of current measures, or development of novel measures, of postoperative morbidity might improve consensus in this area.

Text
step_mortality_manuscript_revisions - Accepted Manuscript
Download (361kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 December 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 January 2023
Published date: 1 April 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: AIRJ was supported by the University of Southampton National Institute of Health Research Academic Clinical Fellowship . SRM is supported by the University College London Hospitals National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre . This manuscript represents the views of the authors and not of the NIHR or Department of Health and Social Care. MG is in part funded by NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre and as an NIHR Senior Investigator. Funding Information: RP holds research grants, honoraria, or both from Edwards Lifesciences , Intersurgical and GlaxoSmithkline . MPWG is an elected council member of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, board member of the British Journal of Anaesthesia, board chair of the National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, and deputy chair of the UK National Centre for Perioperative Care. MG has received unrestricted research funding from Edwards Lifesciences Ltd, Pharmacosmos Ltd and Sphere Medical Ltd. He has served on the medical advisory board of Sphere Medical Ltd and Edwards Lifesciences Ltd. RMP and PSM are editors of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 British Journal of Anaesthesia
Keywords: anaesthesia, consensus, morbidity, mortality, organ failure, perioperative outcomes, postoperative morbidity, surgery

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475333
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475333
ISSN: 0007-0912
PURE UUID: 5b305c10-8293-45a5-a8ad-a1f9845dd046
ORCID for Sandy Jackson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3153-9231
ORCID for Michael P.W. Grocott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-7581

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Mar 2023 17:44
Last modified: 16 Apr 2024 04:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sandy Jackson ORCID iD
Author: Oliver Boney
Author: Rupert Pearse
Author: Andrea Kurz
Author: D. James Cooper
Author: Wilton A. van Klei
Author: Luca Cabrini
Author: Timothy E. Miller
Author: S. Ramani Moonesinghe
Author: Paul Myles
Author: Mark Johnson
Corporate Author: et al.
Corporate Author: The StEP-COMPACGroup

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×