The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin parameters at different body locations

An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin parameters at different body locations
An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin parameters at different body locations

Background: Skin is the largest organ in the body, representing an important interface to monitor health and disease. However, there is significant variation in skin properties for different ages, genders and body regions due to the differences in the structure and morphology of the skin tissues. This study aimed to evaluate the use of non-invasive tools to discriminate a range of mechanical and functional skin parameters from different skin sites. 

Materials and methods: A cohort of 15 healthy volunteers was recruited following appropriate informed consent. Four well-established CE-marked non-invasive techniques were used to measure four anatomical regions: palm, forearm, sole and lower lumbar L3, using a repeated measures design. Skin parameters included trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), pH (acidity), erythema, stratum corneum hydration and stiffness and elasticity using Myoton Pro (skin and muscle probe). Differences between body locations for each parameter and the intra-rater reliability between days were evaluated by the same operator. 

Results: The results indicate that parameters differed significantly between skin sites. For the Myoton skin probe, the sole recorded the highest stiffness value of 1006 N/m (SD ± 179), while the lower lumbar recorded the least value of 484 N/m (SD ± 160). The muscle indenter Myoton probe revealed the palm's highest value of 754 N/m (± 108), and the lower lumbar recorded the least value of 208 N/m (SD ± 44). TEWL values were lowest on the forearm, averaging 11 g/m2/h, and highest on the palm, averaging 41 g/m2/h. Similar skin hydration levels were recorded in three of the four sites, with the main difference being observed in the sole averaging 13 arbitrary units. Erythema values were characterised by a high degree of inter-subject variation, and no significant differences between sites or sides were observed. The Myoton Pro Skin showed excellent reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.70) for all sites with exception of one site right lower back; the Myoton pro muscle probes showed good to poor reliability (0.90–017), the corneometer showed excellent reliability (>0.75) among all the sites tested, and the TEWL showed Good to poor reliability (0.74–0.4) among sites. 

Conclusion: The study revealed that using non-invasive methods, the biophysical properties of skin can be mapped, and significant differences in the mechanical and functional properties of skin were observed. These parameters were reliably recorded between days, providing a basis for their use in assessing and monitoring changes in the skin during health and disease.

biophysical parameters, functional properties, hydration, mechanical loading, mechanical properties, sensitivity analysis
0909-752X
John, Anto J. U. K.
518d3739-712a-4681-9d0c-3e4fccf00454
Galdo, Francesco Del
02143fa2-ebc0-4b64-bb6b-6ad8c3de73ac
Gush, Rodney
cfdfe7f0-88c8-4f76-ae3a-e37a73eb04c5
Worsley, Peter R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
John, Anto J. U. K.
518d3739-712a-4681-9d0c-3e4fccf00454
Galdo, Francesco Del
02143fa2-ebc0-4b64-bb6b-6ad8c3de73ac
Gush, Rodney
cfdfe7f0-88c8-4f76-ae3a-e37a73eb04c5
Worsley, Peter R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756

John, Anto J. U. K., Galdo, Francesco Del, Gush, Rodney and Worsley, Peter R. (2023) An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin parameters at different body locations. Skin Research and Technology, 29 (2), [e13292]. (doi:10.1111/srt.13292).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Skin is the largest organ in the body, representing an important interface to monitor health and disease. However, there is significant variation in skin properties for different ages, genders and body regions due to the differences in the structure and morphology of the skin tissues. This study aimed to evaluate the use of non-invasive tools to discriminate a range of mechanical and functional skin parameters from different skin sites. 

Materials and methods: A cohort of 15 healthy volunteers was recruited following appropriate informed consent. Four well-established CE-marked non-invasive techniques were used to measure four anatomical regions: palm, forearm, sole and lower lumbar L3, using a repeated measures design. Skin parameters included trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), pH (acidity), erythema, stratum corneum hydration and stiffness and elasticity using Myoton Pro (skin and muscle probe). Differences between body locations for each parameter and the intra-rater reliability between days were evaluated by the same operator. 

Results: The results indicate that parameters differed significantly between skin sites. For the Myoton skin probe, the sole recorded the highest stiffness value of 1006 N/m (SD ± 179), while the lower lumbar recorded the least value of 484 N/m (SD ± 160). The muscle indenter Myoton probe revealed the palm's highest value of 754 N/m (± 108), and the lower lumbar recorded the least value of 208 N/m (SD ± 44). TEWL values were lowest on the forearm, averaging 11 g/m2/h, and highest on the palm, averaging 41 g/m2/h. Similar skin hydration levels were recorded in three of the four sites, with the main difference being observed in the sole averaging 13 arbitrary units. Erythema values were characterised by a high degree of inter-subject variation, and no significant differences between sites or sides were observed. The Myoton Pro Skin showed excellent reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.70) for all sites with exception of one site right lower back; the Myoton pro muscle probes showed good to poor reliability (0.90–017), the corneometer showed excellent reliability (>0.75) among all the sites tested, and the TEWL showed Good to poor reliability (0.74–0.4) among sites. 

Conclusion: The study revealed that using non-invasive methods, the biophysical properties of skin can be mapped, and significant differences in the mechanical and functional properties of skin were observed. These parameters were reliably recorded between days, providing a basis for their use in assessing and monitoring changes in the skin during health and disease.

Text
Skin measurement paper_pw-AJ pwajrgFDG-Aj - Accepted Manuscript
Download (408kB)
Text
Skin Research and Technology - 2023 - John - An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin parameters at different body - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (954kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 February 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 February 2023
Published date: 17 February 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the funding received from the SRUK- SP1. The underpinning RDM data for this paper can be found at https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D2316. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: biophysical parameters, functional properties, hydration, mechanical loading, mechanical properties, sensitivity analysis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475456
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475456
ISSN: 0909-752X
PURE UUID: 39cfa973-c37a-4e6b-9348-02b682c61413
ORCID for Peter R. Worsley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Mar 2023 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Francesco Del Galdo
Author: Rodney Gush

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×