The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women

Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women
Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women

Background: The perimenopausal and postmenopausal periods are associated with many symptoms, including sexual complaints. Objectives: To assess the effect of hormone therapy (HT) on sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Search methods: We searched for articles in the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ISI Web of Knowledge and OpenGrey. The last search was performed in December 2012. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials comparing HT to either placebo or no intervention (control). We considered as HT estrogens alone, estrogens in combination with progestogens; synthetic steroids (for example tibolone); or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (for example raloxifene, bazedoxifene). Studies of other drugs possibly used in the relief of menopausal symptoms were excluded. We included studies that evaluated sexual function using any validated assessment tool. The primary outcome was a composite score for sexual function and the scores for individual domains (arousal and sexual interest, orgasm, and pain) were secondary outcomes. Studies were selected by two authors independently. Data collection and analysis: Data were independently extracted by two authors and checked by a third. Risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two authors. We contacted study investigators as required. Data were analysed using standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR). We stratified the analysis by participant characteristics with regard to menopausal symptoms. The overall quality of the evidence for the primary outcome was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. Main results: The search retrieved 2351 records from which 27 studies (16,393 women) were included. The 'symptomatic or early post-menopausal' subgroup included nine studies: perimenopausal women (one study), up to 36 months postmenopause (one study), up to five years postmenopause (one study), experiencing vasomotor or other menopausal symptoms (five studies), or experiencing hot flushes and sexual dysfunction (one study). The 'unselected postmenopausal women' subgroup included 18 studies, which included women regardless of menopausal symptoms and permitted the inclusion of women with more than five years since the final menstrual period. No studies were restricted to women with sexual dysfunction. Only five studies evaluated sexual function as a primary outcome. Eighteen studies were deemed at high risk of bias, and the other nine studies were at unclear risk of bias. Twenty studies received commercial funding. Findings for sexual function (measured by composite score): For estrogens alone versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the SMD and 95% CI were compatible with a small to moderate benefit in sexual function for the HT group (SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.54, P < 0.00001, 3 studies, 699 women, I2 = 55%, high-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.34, P = 0.08, 2 studies, 478 women, I2 = 44%, low-quality evidence). The subgroups were not pooled because of considerable heterogeneity. For estrogens combined with progestogens versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with a small to moderate benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.64, P = 0.0003, 1 study, 335 women, moderate-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.20, P = 0.10, 3 studies, 1314 women, I2 = 0%, moderate-quality evidence). The subgroups were not pooled because of considerable heterogeneity. For tibolone versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.13, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.26, P = 0.05, 1 study, 883 women, low-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a moderate benefit (SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.71, P = 0.03, 2 studies, 142 women, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence). In the combined analysis, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.29, P = 0.008, 3 studies, 1025 women, I2 = 20%). For SERMs versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a moderate benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.50, P = 0.09, 1 study, 215 women, low-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with small harm to a small benefit (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.29, P = 0.72, 1 study, 283 women, low-quality evidence). In the combined analysis, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.31, P = 0.16, 2 studies, 498 women, I2 = 2%). A comparison of SERMs combined with estrogens versus control was only evaluated in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women. The 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.43, P = 0.05, 1 study, 542 women, moderate-quality evidence). Authors' conclusions: HT treatment with estrogens alone or in combination with progestogens was associated with a small to moderate improvement in sexual function, particularly in pain, when used in women with menopausal symptoms or in early postmenopause (within five years of amenorrhoea), but not in unselected postmenopausal women. Evidence regarding other HTs (synthetic steroids and SERMs) is of low quality and we are uncertain of their effect on sexual function. The current evidence does not suggest an important effect of tibolone or of SERMs alone or combined with estrogens on sexual function. More studies evaluating the effect of synthetic steroids, SERMS and the association of SERM + estrogens would improve the quality of the evidence for the effect of these treatments on sexual function in peri and postmenopausal women. Future studies should also evaluate the effect of HT solely among women with sexual complaints.

1072-3714
Meziou, Nadia
780def6a-b50d-438d-9be0-b22597dcbed4
Scholfield, Clare
be4d126a-3da1-444d-b562-c1fe05b6fdfd
Taylor, Caroline A.
37d3270e-3bab-4bf0-902f-b913111c8a45
Armstrong, Heather
3dc9c223-1a61-47ad-ab0b-50d06cddf4f2
Meziou, Nadia
780def6a-b50d-438d-9be0-b22597dcbed4
Scholfield, Clare
be4d126a-3da1-444d-b562-c1fe05b6fdfd
Taylor, Caroline A.
37d3270e-3bab-4bf0-902f-b913111c8a45
Armstrong, Heather
3dc9c223-1a61-47ad-ab0b-50d06cddf4f2

Meziou, Nadia, Scholfield, Clare, Taylor, Caroline A. and Armstrong, Heather (2023) Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Menopause, 2013 (6), [CD009672]. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009672.pub2).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: The perimenopausal and postmenopausal periods are associated with many symptoms, including sexual complaints. Objectives: To assess the effect of hormone therapy (HT) on sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Search methods: We searched for articles in the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ISI Web of Knowledge and OpenGrey. The last search was performed in December 2012. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials comparing HT to either placebo or no intervention (control). We considered as HT estrogens alone, estrogens in combination with progestogens; synthetic steroids (for example tibolone); or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (for example raloxifene, bazedoxifene). Studies of other drugs possibly used in the relief of menopausal symptoms were excluded. We included studies that evaluated sexual function using any validated assessment tool. The primary outcome was a composite score for sexual function and the scores for individual domains (arousal and sexual interest, orgasm, and pain) were secondary outcomes. Studies were selected by two authors independently. Data collection and analysis: Data were independently extracted by two authors and checked by a third. Risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two authors. We contacted study investigators as required. Data were analysed using standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR). We stratified the analysis by participant characteristics with regard to menopausal symptoms. The overall quality of the evidence for the primary outcome was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. Main results: The search retrieved 2351 records from which 27 studies (16,393 women) were included. The 'symptomatic or early post-menopausal' subgroup included nine studies: perimenopausal women (one study), up to 36 months postmenopause (one study), up to five years postmenopause (one study), experiencing vasomotor or other menopausal symptoms (five studies), or experiencing hot flushes and sexual dysfunction (one study). The 'unselected postmenopausal women' subgroup included 18 studies, which included women regardless of menopausal symptoms and permitted the inclusion of women with more than five years since the final menstrual period. No studies were restricted to women with sexual dysfunction. Only five studies evaluated sexual function as a primary outcome. Eighteen studies were deemed at high risk of bias, and the other nine studies were at unclear risk of bias. Twenty studies received commercial funding. Findings for sexual function (measured by composite score): For estrogens alone versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the SMD and 95% CI were compatible with a small to moderate benefit in sexual function for the HT group (SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.54, P < 0.00001, 3 studies, 699 women, I2 = 55%, high-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.34, P = 0.08, 2 studies, 478 women, I2 = 44%, low-quality evidence). The subgroups were not pooled because of considerable heterogeneity. For estrogens combined with progestogens versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with a small to moderate benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.64, P = 0.0003, 1 study, 335 women, moderate-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.20, P = 0.10, 3 studies, 1314 women, I2 = 0%, moderate-quality evidence). The subgroups were not pooled because of considerable heterogeneity. For tibolone versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.13, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.26, P = 0.05, 1 study, 883 women, low-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a moderate benefit (SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.71, P = 0.03, 2 studies, 142 women, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence). In the combined analysis, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.29, P = 0.008, 3 studies, 1025 women, I2 = 20%). For SERMs versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a moderate benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.50, P = 0.09, 1 study, 215 women, low-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with small harm to a small benefit (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.29, P = 0.72, 1 study, 283 women, low-quality evidence). In the combined analysis, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.31, P = 0.16, 2 studies, 498 women, I2 = 2%). A comparison of SERMs combined with estrogens versus control was only evaluated in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women. The 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.43, P = 0.05, 1 study, 542 women, moderate-quality evidence). Authors' conclusions: HT treatment with estrogens alone or in combination with progestogens was associated with a small to moderate improvement in sexual function, particularly in pain, when used in women with menopausal symptoms or in early postmenopause (within five years of amenorrhoea), but not in unselected postmenopausal women. Evidence regarding other HTs (synthetic steroids and SERMs) is of low quality and we are uncertain of their effect on sexual function. The current evidence does not suggest an important effect of tibolone or of SERMs alone or combined with estrogens on sexual function. More studies evaluating the effect of synthetic steroids, SERMS and the association of SERM + estrogens would improve the quality of the evidence for the effect of these treatments on sexual function in peri and postmenopausal women. Future studies should also evaluate the effect of HT solely among women with sexual complaints.

Text
HT for sexual function (Feb 13, 2023) final accepted manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (633kB)
Text
Hormone_therapy_for_sexual_function_in.182 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 February 2023
Published date: 10 May 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: Arizona Sexual Experiences (ASEX) scale: domains Menopause-specific Quality of Life (MENQOL): composite Final scores Follow-up: 12 weeks Mean age in each group: 56.4 (±4.7); 56.3 (±4.4); 56.4 (±4.5); 56.1 (±4.2) BMI: Intervention 1 (25.4±3.8); 2 (25.2±3.8); 3 (25.3±3.9); and placebo (25.7±4.1) Intervention groups 1 and 2 were merged for analysis Wyeth Research, Collegeville, PA, sponsored the study and supported the medical writing assistance of Kathleen Ohleth PhD, and Chastity Bradley PhD G Bachmann has served as a Research Consultant-PI for Wyeth, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Duramed, Novartis, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Boston Scientific, Novo Nordisk, Procter & Gamble, Merck, Xanodyne, Hormos, and Femme Pharma. J Bobula and S Mirkin are current employees of Wyeth. Dr Risa Kagan received research grants from Proctor & Gamble, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Depomed, and Wyeth. Dr Kagan is a consultant for Proctor & Gamble, Lilly, Medtronic, and Wyeth and is a speaker for GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Novogyne, Novartis, and Lilly. Dr Williams received research grants from Wyeth, Xanodyne, and Organon and is also a speaker for Wyeth. Drs Mirkin and Pickar and Kaijie Pan are full-time employees of Wyeth Research, Collegeville, PA Funding Information: Follow up: 24 months Age: intervention = 66.8 (±5.1); control = 66.7 (±4.8) years This research was supported in part by a grant from Berlex Laboratories Inc and manufacturer of the estradiol patch used; and by Grant KLZRR024130 from the National Center for Research Resource, a component of the NIH Funding Information: Report the results of the questionnaire in figures, no numeric data presented This study was funded by Wyeth, Collegeville, PA. PREMARIN and PREMARIN Vaginal Cream are manufactured and marketed by Wyeth. Alberta Vieweg and Michael Gast are current or former employees of Wyeth Follow-up: 3 months Funding Information: Follow-up: 1 year for the included evaluation (3.6 years total) Trial register: ISRCTN35338757 Potentially eligible women were randomised into four trial groups resulting in two sub-studies 1) blind hormone therapy group versus blind placebo group (Estonian blind trial) 2) non-blind hormone therapy group versus non-treatment group (Estonian non-blind trial) 1001 women were recruited into the non-blind subtrial and 777 in the blind subtrial The Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy trial was originally planned to be a part of the Women’s International Study of Long Duration Oestrogen After Menopause (WISDOM) The study was financially supported by grants from the Academy of Finland (grants 69838, 201490, 115088), STAKES (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), Finland, and the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research Drugs were donated by Wyeth Ayerst Company via the Women’s International Study of Long Duration Oestrogen After Menopause (WISDOM) in the United Kingdom Funding Information: Mean age: intervention (51.9±3.6 years); control (52.4±3.3 years) Weight: intervention (70±16.1 kg); control (67.8±16.4 kg) Follow up: 4 months This study was funded by Wyeth, Collegeville, PA. Prempro is manufactured and marketed by Wyeth. Dr. Maki has received grants (in excess of $10,000) and honoraria from Wyeth. Dr. Yaffe has received grants (in excess of $10,000) and honoraria from Wyeth. Dr. Gast, A.J. Vieweg, and S.W. Burriss are current or former employees of Wyeth. Dr. Gast has ownership interest in the company. Dr. Yaffe received compensation through the University of California for her role as a consultant throughout the trial Funding Information: Follow-up: 1 year for the included evaluation (3.6 years total) Trial register: ISRCTN35338757 Potentially eligible women were randomised into four trial groups resulting in two sub-studies 1) blind hormone therapy group vs. blind placebo group (Estonian blind trial) 2) non-blind hormone therapy group vs. non-treatment group (Estonian non-blind trial) 1001 women were recruited into the non-blind sub-trial and 777 in the blind subtrial The Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy trial was originally planned to be a part of the Women’s International Study of Long Duration Oestrogen After Menopause (WISDOM) The study was financially supported by grants from the Academy of Finland (grants 69838, 201490, 115088), STAKES (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), Finland, and the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research Drugs were donated by Wyeth Ayerst Company via the Women’s International Study of Long Duration Oestrogen After Menopause (WISDOM) in the United Kingdom Publisher Copyright: © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 475973
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/475973
ISSN: 1072-3714
PURE UUID: 1fdbc805-39d1-467e-9775-2f804883c9c8
ORCID for Heather Armstrong: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-8644

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Apr 2023 16:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nadia Meziou
Author: Clare Scholfield
Author: Caroline A. Taylor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×