The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patient perceptions of empathy in primary care telephone consultations: A mixed methods study

Patient perceptions of empathy in primary care telephone consultations: A mixed methods study
Patient perceptions of empathy in primary care telephone consultations: A mixed methods study
Objective: clinical empathy can enhance patient outcomes. This study examined patients’ perceptions of empathy in primary care consultations delivered by telephone.

Methods: a mixed methods study was nested in a larger feasibility study conducted May-October 2020. Adults reporting a UK primary care consultation in the previous 2 weeks completed an online survey. A sample of survey respondents participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Interviews were analysed thematically.

Results: survey respondents (n=359) rated practitioners as between ‘good’ and ‘very good’ at established patient-reported indicators of clinical empathy. Telephone consultations were rated slightly lower than face-to-face or other consultations. 30 survey respondents were interviewed. Three qualitative themes identified how telephone consultations can shape clinical empathy: setting for an empathic encounter; feeling connected; being acknowledged.

Conclusion: primary care patients typically perceive good levels of clinical empathy in telephone consultations; specific features of telephone consultations may facilitate and/or hinder clinical empathy.

Practice implications: to ensure patients feel listened to, acknowledged and understood, practitioners may need to increase their empathic verbalisations in telephone consultations. By using verbal responses to demonstrate active listening and by clearly describing and/or implementing next steps in management, practitioners may be able to enhance clinical empathy in telephone consultations.
clinical empathy, communication;, general practice;, mixed methods;, primary healthcare, qualitative, Mixed methods, Primary healthcare, Clinical empathy, General practice, Qualitative, Communication
0738-3991
Vennik, Jane
6ee78166-5a7a-433b-87fc-018771f20b19
Hughes, Stephanie Frances
05f3a01e-73a1-4b1d-9996-a0028c42ec2e
Lyness, Emily
6d59d191-a210-4c77-b9eb-cb6b1d669042
McDermott, Clare Rachel
059da963-e1ec-48d7-8c63-137f92b78a12
Smith, Kirsten A.
9da65772-0efa-4267-87ff-563f9757b34e
Steele, Mary
dd7833c4-c04c-495c-aa9a-b23e01a89762
Bostock, Jennifer
3a741e2f-f94c-4112-bfdc-42216867a40b
Howick, Jeremy
0d21085b-6b93-4a4e-8d87-1cc3a83f8768
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Leydon, Geraldine
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Mallen, Christian
b6745975-69e1-42b6-b617-37f393237024
Morrison, Leanne
920a4eda-0f9d-4bd9-842d-6873b1afafef
Stuart, Beth
626862fc-892b-4f6d-9cbb-7a8d7172b209
Everitt, Hazel
80b9452f-9632-45a8-b017-ceeeee6971ef
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
et al.
Vennik, Jane
6ee78166-5a7a-433b-87fc-018771f20b19
Hughes, Stephanie Frances
05f3a01e-73a1-4b1d-9996-a0028c42ec2e
Lyness, Emily
6d59d191-a210-4c77-b9eb-cb6b1d669042
McDermott, Clare Rachel
059da963-e1ec-48d7-8c63-137f92b78a12
Smith, Kirsten A.
9da65772-0efa-4267-87ff-563f9757b34e
Steele, Mary
dd7833c4-c04c-495c-aa9a-b23e01a89762
Bostock, Jennifer
3a741e2f-f94c-4112-bfdc-42216867a40b
Howick, Jeremy
0d21085b-6b93-4a4e-8d87-1cc3a83f8768
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Leydon, Geraldine
c5cdaff5-0fa1-4d38-b575-b97c2892ec40
Mallen, Christian
b6745975-69e1-42b6-b617-37f393237024
Morrison, Leanne
920a4eda-0f9d-4bd9-842d-6873b1afafef
Stuart, Beth
626862fc-892b-4f6d-9cbb-7a8d7172b209
Everitt, Hazel
80b9452f-9632-45a8-b017-ceeeee6971ef
Bishop, Felicity L.
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928

Vennik, Jane, Hughes, Stephanie Frances and Lyness, Emily , et al. (2023) Patient perceptions of empathy in primary care telephone consultations: A mixed methods study. Patient Education and Counseling, 113, [107748]. (doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107748).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: clinical empathy can enhance patient outcomes. This study examined patients’ perceptions of empathy in primary care consultations delivered by telephone.

Methods: a mixed methods study was nested in a larger feasibility study conducted May-October 2020. Adults reporting a UK primary care consultation in the previous 2 weeks completed an online survey. A sample of survey respondents participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Interviews were analysed thematically.

Results: survey respondents (n=359) rated practitioners as between ‘good’ and ‘very good’ at established patient-reported indicators of clinical empathy. Telephone consultations were rated slightly lower than face-to-face or other consultations. 30 survey respondents were interviewed. Three qualitative themes identified how telephone consultations can shape clinical empathy: setting for an empathic encounter; feeling connected; being acknowledged.

Conclusion: primary care patients typically perceive good levels of clinical empathy in telephone consultations; specific features of telephone consultations may facilitate and/or hinder clinical empathy.

Practice implications: to ensure patients feel listened to, acknowledged and understood, practitioners may need to increase their empathic verbalisations in telephone consultations. By using verbal responses to demonstrate active listening and by clearly describing and/or implementing next steps in management, practitioners may be able to enhance clinical empathy in telephone consultations.

Text
Empathy tel consult_PEC_11.11.22_nocodes - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (87kB)
Text
1-s2.0-S0738399123001283-main (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 April 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 April 2023
Published date: 2 May 2023
Keywords: clinical empathy, communication;, general practice;, mixed methods;, primary healthcare, qualitative, Mixed methods, Primary healthcare, Clinical empathy, General practice, Qualitative, Communication

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476625
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476625
ISSN: 0738-3991
PURE UUID: 72c0bb32-120d-47d6-b05d-86f5744ccd3c
ORCID for Jane Vennik: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-9805
ORCID for Mary Steele: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-3855
ORCID for Geraldine Leydon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5986-3300
ORCID for Leanne Morrison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-551X
ORCID for Beth Stuart: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-7437
ORCID for Hazel Everitt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-8403
ORCID for Felicity L. Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 May 2023 16:40
Last modified: 23 Apr 2024 01:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jane Vennik ORCID iD
Author: Stephanie Frances Hughes
Author: Emily Lyness
Author: Clare Rachel McDermott
Author: Mary Steele ORCID iD
Author: Jennifer Bostock
Author: Jeremy Howick
Author: Paul Little
Author: Christian Mallen
Author: Leanne Morrison ORCID iD
Author: Beth Stuart ORCID iD
Author: Hazel Everitt ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×