The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Machine learning as an adjunct to expert observation in classification of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study

Machine learning as an adjunct to expert observation in classification of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study
Machine learning as an adjunct to expert observation in classification of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study
Background: Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent type of arthritis. Many approaches exist for characterising radiographic knee OA, including machine learning (ML).
Aims: To examine Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) scores from ML and expert observation, minimum joint space and osteophyte in relation to pain and function.
Methods:Participants from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, comprising individuals born in Hertfordshire from 1931-1939, were analysed. Radiographs were assessed by clinicians and ML (convolutional neural networks) for K&L scoring. Medial minimum joint space and osteophyte area were ascertained using the knee OA computer-aided diagnosis (KOACAD) program. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was administered. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was implemented for minimum joint space, osteophyte, and observer- and ML-derived K&L scores in relation to pain (WOMAC pain score > 0) and impaired function (WOMAC function score > 0).
Results:359 participants (aged 71-80) were analysed. Among both sexes, discriminative capacity regarding pain and function was fairly high for observer-derived K&L scores (area under curve (AUC): 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57,0.72) to 0.70 (0.63,0.77)); results were similar among women for ML-derived K&L scores. Discriminative capacity was moderate among men for minimum joint space in relation to pain (0.60 (0.51,0.67)) and function (0.62 (0.54,0.69)). AUC<0.60 for other sex-specific associations.
Discussion: Observer-derived K&L scores had higher discriminative capacity regarding pain and function compared to minimum joint space and osteophyte. Among women, discriminative capacity was similar for observer- and ML-derived K&L scores.
Conclusion: ML as an adjunct to expert observation for K&L scoring may be beneficial due to the efficiency and objectivity of ML.
, Artificial intelligence, Epidemiology, Kellgren and Lawrence, Musculoskeletal, Sasan, mahmoodi
1594-0667
1449-1457
Westbury, Leo
74411e83-e3ee-48ca-a6d0-4d4888f7bdd5
Fuggle, Nicholas
9ab0c81a-ac67-41c4-8860-23e0fdb1a900
Pereira, Diogo
f9b434e8-1c7f-4d61-a005-654f719e2022
Oka, Hiroyuki
a7e2d904-78eb-445c-a5a6-0f2461f94dd2
Yoshimura, Noriko
00436389-57b3-444c-b69d-0dc934d8e0d5
Oe, Noriyuki
2836cf20-aee5-411f-ab5a-89d8e45fa526
Mahmoodi, Sasan
91ca8da4-95dc-4c1e-ac0e-f2c08d6ac7cf
Niranjan, Mahesan
5cbaeea8-7288-4b55-a89c-c43d212ddd4f
Dennison, Elaine
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Cooper, Cyrus
cbbb15cb-f2b5-446a-92cd-b8d48c7f30a0
et al.
Westbury, Leo
74411e83-e3ee-48ca-a6d0-4d4888f7bdd5
Fuggle, Nicholas
9ab0c81a-ac67-41c4-8860-23e0fdb1a900
Pereira, Diogo
f9b434e8-1c7f-4d61-a005-654f719e2022
Oka, Hiroyuki
a7e2d904-78eb-445c-a5a6-0f2461f94dd2
Yoshimura, Noriko
00436389-57b3-444c-b69d-0dc934d8e0d5
Oe, Noriyuki
2836cf20-aee5-411f-ab5a-89d8e45fa526
Mahmoodi, Sasan
91ca8da4-95dc-4c1e-ac0e-f2c08d6ac7cf
Niranjan, Mahesan
5cbaeea8-7288-4b55-a89c-c43d212ddd4f
Dennison, Elaine
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Cooper, Cyrus
cbbb15cb-f2b5-446a-92cd-b8d48c7f30a0

Westbury, Leo, Fuggle, Nicholas, Pereira, Diogo, Mahmoodi, Sasan, Niranjan, Mahesan and Dennison, Elaine , et al. (2023) Machine learning as an adjunct to expert observation in classification of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 35 (7), 1449-1457. (doi:10.1007/s40520-023-02428-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is the most prevalent type of arthritis. Many approaches exist for characterising radiographic knee OA, including machine learning (ML).
Aims: To examine Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) scores from ML and expert observation, minimum joint space and osteophyte in relation to pain and function.
Methods:Participants from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, comprising individuals born in Hertfordshire from 1931-1939, were analysed. Radiographs were assessed by clinicians and ML (convolutional neural networks) for K&L scoring. Medial minimum joint space and osteophyte area were ascertained using the knee OA computer-aided diagnosis (KOACAD) program. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was administered. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was implemented for minimum joint space, osteophyte, and observer- and ML-derived K&L scores in relation to pain (WOMAC pain score > 0) and impaired function (WOMAC function score > 0).
Results:359 participants (aged 71-80) were analysed. Among both sexes, discriminative capacity regarding pain and function was fairly high for observer-derived K&L scores (area under curve (AUC): 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57,0.72) to 0.70 (0.63,0.77)); results were similar among women for ML-derived K&L scores. Discriminative capacity was moderate among men for minimum joint space in relation to pain (0.60 (0.51,0.67)) and function (0.62 (0.54,0.69)). AUC<0.60 for other sex-specific associations.
Discussion: Observer-derived K&L scores had higher discriminative capacity regarding pain and function compared to minimum joint space and osteophyte. Among women, discriminative capacity was similar for observer- and ML-derived K&L scores.
Conclusion: ML as an adjunct to expert observation for K&L scoring may be beneficial due to the efficiency and objectivity of ML.

Text
Accepted manuscript (KOACAD and ML for knee OA in HCS) - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (162kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 April 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 May 2023
Published date: July 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: The Hertfordshire Cohort Study was supported by the Medical Research Council University Unit Partnership grant number MRC_MC_UP_A620_1014. CC, EMD and LDW are supported by the UK Medical Research Council [MC_PC_21003; MC_PC_21001]. The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons attribution license (CC BY) to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
Keywords: , Artificial intelligence, Epidemiology, Kellgren and Lawrence, Musculoskeletal, Sasan, mahmoodi

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 476972
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/476972
ISSN: 1594-0667
PURE UUID: ae5232fd-3d90-42f8-b1f1-898d0a491f00
ORCID for Nicholas Fuggle: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-2255
ORCID for Mahesan Niranjan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-140X
ORCID for Elaine Dennison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-4961

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 May 2023 17:10
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:54

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Leo Westbury
Author: Nicholas Fuggle ORCID iD
Author: Diogo Pereira
Author: Hiroyuki Oka
Author: Noriko Yoshimura
Author: Noriyuki Oe
Author: Sasan Mahmoodi
Author: Mahesan Niranjan ORCID iD
Author: Elaine Dennison ORCID iD
Author: Cyrus Cooper
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×