Ethics, rigour and agility of research and evaluation methods in a changing social and clinical context: reflections from a psychosocial research centre on the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

The Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer conducts world-leading research and service evaluations to support well-being and quality of life amongst those affected by cancer. This paper reflects on how we adapted our research management and study methods during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the implications for ongoing research practice. We use four case studies to consider the benefits and challenges of adapting to remote approaches to research and evaluation delivery: maintaining high ethical standards and data security in evaluation projects with remote approvals; recruiting for and running online discussion groups to inform intervention development; designing and delivering an in-person intervention via video conferencing; and adapting a longitudinal qualitative study to focus on newly emerging issues. We reflect on how we can maintain quality and rigour when conducting remote research and evaluation, and how this can affect our experience as researchers. We also consider possible implications of the uncertainty created by the COVID-19 pandemic for the funding and design of future research and evaluations.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Kate Morton: orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-0314

ORCID for Lynn Calman: orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-6017

ORCID for Chloe Grimmett: orcid.org/0000-0002-7540-7206

ORCID for Claire Foster: orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-8378

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics