IRS-aided wireless powered MEC systems: TDMA or NOMA for computation offloading?
IRS-aided wireless powered MEC systems: TDMA or NOMA for computation offloading?
An intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)-aided wirelesspowered
mobile edge computing (WP-MEC) system is conceived, where each device’s
computational task can be divided into two parts for local computing and
offloading to mobile edge computing (MEC) servers, respectively. Both time
division multiple access (TDMA) and non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA)
schemes are considered for uplink (UL) offloading. To fully unleash the
potential benefits of the IRS, employing multiple IRS beamforming (BF)
patterns/vectors in the considered operating frame
to create timeselectivity channels, i.e., dynamic IRS BF (DIBF), is in
principle possible at the cost of additional signaling overhead. To strike a
balance between the system performance and associated signalling overhead, we
propose three cases of DIBF configurations based on the maximum number of IRS
reconfiguration times. The degree-of-freedom provided by the IRS may introduce
different impacts on the TDMA and NOMA-based UL offloading schemes. Thus, it is
still fundamentally unknown which multiple access scheme is
superior for MEC UL offloading by considering the
impact of the IRS. To answer this question, we provide a comprehensively
theoretical performance comparison for the TDMA and NOMA-based offloading
schemes under the three cases of DIBF configurations by characterizing their
achievable computation rate. Analytical results demonstrate that offloading
adopting TDMA can achieve the same computation rate as that of NOMA, when all
the devices share the same IRS BF vector during the UL offloading. By contrast,
computation offloading exploiting TDMA outperforms NOMA, when the IRS BF vector
can be flexibly adapted for UL offloading. Then, we propose computationally
efficient algorithms by invoking alternating optimization for solving their
associated computation rate maximization problems. Our numerical results
demonstrate the significant performance gains
achieved by the proposed designs over various benchmark schemes and also unveil
that the optimal time allocated to downlink wireless power transfer can be
effectively reduced with the aid of IRSs, which is beneficial for both the
system’s spectral efficiency and its energy efficiency.
1201-1218
Chen, Guangji
700740ef-1180-4b1f-a590-523da4cb8af1
Wu, Qingqing
2ab2d88f-a892-4609-95f9-90c2054b9478
Chen, Wen
cd79c830-db68-43c5-9b32-3f47be6bc956
Ng, Derrick Wing Kwan
8e2a32d3-cb0d-4c38-b05c-03ef16a5c707
Hanzo, Lajos
66e7266f-3066-4fc0-8391-e000acce71a1
Chen, Guangji
700740ef-1180-4b1f-a590-523da4cb8af1
Wu, Qingqing
2ab2d88f-a892-4609-95f9-90c2054b9478
Chen, Wen
cd79c830-db68-43c5-9b32-3f47be6bc956
Ng, Derrick Wing Kwan
8e2a32d3-cb0d-4c38-b05c-03ef16a5c707
Hanzo, Lajos
66e7266f-3066-4fc0-8391-e000acce71a1
Chen, Guangji, Wu, Qingqing, Chen, Wen, Ng, Derrick Wing Kwan and Hanzo, Lajos
(2022)
IRS-aided wireless powered MEC systems: TDMA or NOMA for computation offloading?
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 22 (2), .
(doi:10.1109/TWC.2022.3203158).
(In Press)
Abstract
An intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)-aided wirelesspowered
mobile edge computing (WP-MEC) system is conceived, where each device’s
computational task can be divided into two parts for local computing and
offloading to mobile edge computing (MEC) servers, respectively. Both time
division multiple access (TDMA) and non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA)
schemes are considered for uplink (UL) offloading. To fully unleash the
potential benefits of the IRS, employing multiple IRS beamforming (BF)
patterns/vectors in the considered operating frame
to create timeselectivity channels, i.e., dynamic IRS BF (DIBF), is in
principle possible at the cost of additional signaling overhead. To strike a
balance between the system performance and associated signalling overhead, we
propose three cases of DIBF configurations based on the maximum number of IRS
reconfiguration times. The degree-of-freedom provided by the IRS may introduce
different impacts on the TDMA and NOMA-based UL offloading schemes. Thus, it is
still fundamentally unknown which multiple access scheme is
superior for MEC UL offloading by considering the
impact of the IRS. To answer this question, we provide a comprehensively
theoretical performance comparison for the TDMA and NOMA-based offloading
schemes under the three cases of DIBF configurations by characterizing their
achievable computation rate. Analytical results demonstrate that offloading
adopting TDMA can achieve the same computation rate as that of NOMA, when all
the devices share the same IRS BF vector during the UL offloading. By contrast,
computation offloading exploiting TDMA outperforms NOMA, when the IRS BF vector
can be flexibly adapted for UL offloading. Then, we propose computationally
efficient algorithms by invoking alternating optimization for solving their
associated computation rate maximization problems. Our numerical results
demonstrate the significant performance gains
achieved by the proposed designs over various benchmark schemes and also unveil
that the optimal time allocated to downlink wireless power transfer can be
effectively reduced with the aid of IRSs, which is beneficial for both the
system’s spectral efficiency and its energy efficiency.
Text
final
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
IRS-Aided_Wireless_Powered_MEC_Systems_TDMA_or_NOMA_for_Computation_Offloading
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 August 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 477414
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477414
ISSN: 1536-1276
PURE UUID: db99088f-3c10-4b62-b3f6-c41ada25091c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jun 2023 16:52
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Guangji Chen
Author:
Qingqing Wu
Author:
Wen Chen
Author:
Derrick Wing Kwan Ng
Author:
Lajos Hanzo
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics