Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19
Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19
Objectives Respiratory protective equipment is critical to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection, which includes filtering facepiece respirators (FFP3). There are reports of fitting issues within healthcare workers, although the factors affecting fitting outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting respirator fitting outcomes. Design This is a retrospective evaluation study. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national database of fit testing outcomes in England between July and August 2020. Settings The study involves National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. Participants A total of 9592 observations regarding fit test outcomes from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. Intervention Fit testing of FFP3 on a cohort of healthcare workers in England, working in the NHS. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measure was the fit testing result, that is, pass or fail with a specific respirator. Key demographics, including age, gender, ethnicity and face measurements of 5604 healthcare workers, were used to compare fitting outcomes. Results A total of 9592 observations from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to determine the factors which affected fit testing outcome. Results showed that males experienced a significantly (p<0.05) higher fit test success than females (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.81). Those with non-white ethnicities demonstrated significantly lower odds of successful respirator fitting; black (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83), Asian (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.74) and mixed (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79. Conclusion During the early phase of COVID-19, females and non-white ethnicities were less likely to have a successful respirator fitting. Further research is needed to design new respirators which provide equal opportunity for comfortable, effective fitting of these devices.
COVID-19, clinical audit, occupational & industrial medicine
e065068
Caggiari, Silvia
58f49054-6ca6-429b-b499-49b93357e5ba
Bader, D.L.
e7086f10-f647-47b5-b2a5-42fef92cc049
Packman, Zoe
8cb58dd6-3e5c-48f2-90b4-08d7f4f97899
Robinson, Jane
5b25af74-9a22-4ba9-a3e8-936652bacf55
Tranka, Sue
b8f14eb6-b0b2-4dc5-832a-fd3c87782998
Böhning, Dankmar
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
25 May 2023
Caggiari, Silvia
58f49054-6ca6-429b-b499-49b93357e5ba
Bader, D.L.
e7086f10-f647-47b5-b2a5-42fef92cc049
Packman, Zoe
8cb58dd6-3e5c-48f2-90b4-08d7f4f97899
Robinson, Jane
5b25af74-9a22-4ba9-a3e8-936652bacf55
Tranka, Sue
b8f14eb6-b0b2-4dc5-832a-fd3c87782998
Böhning, Dankmar
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Caggiari, Silvia, Bader, D.L., Packman, Zoe, Robinson, Jane, Tranka, Sue, Böhning, Dankmar and Worsley, Peter
(2023)
Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19.
BMJ Open, 13 (5), , [e065068].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068).
Abstract
Objectives Respiratory protective equipment is critical to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection, which includes filtering facepiece respirators (FFP3). There are reports of fitting issues within healthcare workers, although the factors affecting fitting outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting respirator fitting outcomes. Design This is a retrospective evaluation study. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national database of fit testing outcomes in England between July and August 2020. Settings The study involves National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. Participants A total of 9592 observations regarding fit test outcomes from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. Intervention Fit testing of FFP3 on a cohort of healthcare workers in England, working in the NHS. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measure was the fit testing result, that is, pass or fail with a specific respirator. Key demographics, including age, gender, ethnicity and face measurements of 5604 healthcare workers, were used to compare fitting outcomes. Results A total of 9592 observations from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to determine the factors which affected fit testing outcome. Results showed that males experienced a significantly (p<0.05) higher fit test success than females (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.81). Those with non-white ethnicities demonstrated significantly lower odds of successful respirator fitting; black (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83), Asian (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.74) and mixed (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79. Conclusion During the early phase of COVID-19, females and non-white ethnicities were less likely to have a successful respirator fitting. Further research is needed to design new respirators which provide equal opportunity for comfortable, effective fitting of these devices.
Text
348 Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of Respiratory Protective Equipment during the early phase of COVID-19
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
e065068.full
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Version of Record with Supplementary material
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 May 2023
Published date: 25 May 2023
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This study was commissioned by NHS England and Improvement. The secondary analysis of data was supported by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) as part of a funded project 'A Bio-Engineering approach for the SAFE design and fitting of Respiratory Protective Equipment (BE-SAFE RPE)' (Ref EP/V045563/1).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
COVID-19, clinical audit, occupational & industrial medicine
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 477627
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477627
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: ca296807-bf67-467d-84c9-f8799f4c721f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jun 2023 16:55
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D.L. Bader
Author:
Zoe Packman
Author:
Jane Robinson
Author:
Sue Tranka
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics