The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19

Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19
Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19

Objectives Respiratory protective equipment is critical to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection, which includes filtering facepiece respirators (FFP3). There are reports of fitting issues within healthcare workers, although the factors affecting fitting outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting respirator fitting outcomes. Design This is a retrospective evaluation study. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national database of fit testing outcomes in England between July and August 2020. Settings The study involves National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. Participants A total of 9592 observations regarding fit test outcomes from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. Intervention Fit testing of FFP3 on a cohort of healthcare workers in England, working in the NHS. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measure was the fit testing result, that is, pass or fail with a specific respirator. Key demographics, including age, gender, ethnicity and face measurements of 5604 healthcare workers, were used to compare fitting outcomes. Results A total of 9592 observations from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to determine the factors which affected fit testing outcome. Results showed that males experienced a significantly (p<0.05) higher fit test success than females (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.81). Those with non-white ethnicities demonstrated significantly lower odds of successful respirator fitting; black (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83), Asian (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.74) and mixed (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79. Conclusion During the early phase of COVID-19, females and non-white ethnicities were less likely to have a successful respirator fitting. Further research is needed to design new respirators which provide equal opportunity for comfortable, effective fitting of these devices.

COVID-19, clinical audit, occupational & industrial medicine
2044-6055
e065068
Caggiari, Silvia
58f49054-6ca6-429b-b499-49b93357e5ba
Bader, D.L.
e7086f10-f647-47b5-b2a5-42fef92cc049
Packman, Zoe
8cb58dd6-3e5c-48f2-90b4-08d7f4f97899
Robinson, Jane
5b25af74-9a22-4ba9-a3e8-936652bacf55
Tranka, Sue
b8f14eb6-b0b2-4dc5-832a-fd3c87782998
Böhning, Dankmar
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Caggiari, Silvia
58f49054-6ca6-429b-b499-49b93357e5ba
Bader, D.L.
e7086f10-f647-47b5-b2a5-42fef92cc049
Packman, Zoe
8cb58dd6-3e5c-48f2-90b4-08d7f4f97899
Robinson, Jane
5b25af74-9a22-4ba9-a3e8-936652bacf55
Tranka, Sue
b8f14eb6-b0b2-4dc5-832a-fd3c87782998
Böhning, Dankmar
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756

Caggiari, Silvia, Bader, D.L., Packman, Zoe, Robinson, Jane, Tranka, Sue, Böhning, Dankmar and Worsley, Peter (2023) Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19. BMJ Open, 13 (5), e065068, [e065068]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives Respiratory protective equipment is critical to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection, which includes filtering facepiece respirators (FFP3). There are reports of fitting issues within healthcare workers, although the factors affecting fitting outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting respirator fitting outcomes. Design This is a retrospective evaluation study. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national database of fit testing outcomes in England between July and August 2020. Settings The study involves National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. Participants A total of 9592 observations regarding fit test outcomes from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. Intervention Fit testing of FFP3 on a cohort of healthcare workers in England, working in the NHS. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome measure was the fit testing result, that is, pass or fail with a specific respirator. Key demographics, including age, gender, ethnicity and face measurements of 5604 healthcare workers, were used to compare fitting outcomes. Results A total of 9592 observations from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to determine the factors which affected fit testing outcome. Results showed that males experienced a significantly (p<0.05) higher fit test success than females (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.81). Those with non-white ethnicities demonstrated significantly lower odds of successful respirator fitting; black (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83), Asian (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.74) and mixed (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79. Conclusion During the early phase of COVID-19, females and non-white ethnicities were less likely to have a successful respirator fitting. Further research is needed to design new respirators which provide equal opportunity for comfortable, effective fitting of these devices.

Text
348 Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of Respiratory Protective Equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (136kB)
Text
e065068.full - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (425kB)
Text
Version of Record with Supplementary material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (136kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 May 2023
Published date: 25 May 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: This study was commissioned by NHS England and Improvement. The secondary analysis of data was supported by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) as part of a funded project 'A Bio-Engineering approach for the SAFE design and fitting of Respiratory Protective Equipment (BE-SAFE RPE)' (Ref EP/V045563/1). Publisher Copyright: © 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
Keywords: COVID-19, clinical audit, occupational & industrial medicine

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477627
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477627
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: ca296807-bf67-467d-84c9-f8799f4c721f
ORCID for Silvia Caggiari: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-2141
ORCID for Dankmar Böhning: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-7106
ORCID for Peter Worsley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jun 2023 16:55
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Silvia Caggiari ORCID iD
Author: D.L. Bader
Author: Zoe Packman
Author: Jane Robinson
Author: Sue Tranka
Author: Peter Worsley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×