The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Developing artificial biofilms for investigating the effects of physico-mechanical properties on marine biofilm-associated drag

Developing artificial biofilms for investigating the effects of physico-mechanical properties on marine biofilm-associated drag
Developing artificial biofilms for investigating the effects of physico-mechanical properties on marine biofilm-associated drag
Marine biofilms cause a significant increase in drag on ships. From the current literature it is understood that physical and mechanical (physico-mechanical) properties of biofilms influence drag, yet it remains understudied. In part, this is explicable by biofilm heterogeneity and adaptability which complicate efforts to link biofilm properties to frictional drag. As a result, rigid and homogeneous structures are typically used as the benchmark for studying biofilm-associated drag, but as they neglect natural biofilm behaviour, such as viscoelasticity, they could be causing underestimations in drag predictions. To improve drag predictions there is a need to better understand biofilm fluid-structure interactions and the role these play in drag production. In the current work, it was shown that mesoscopic structural properties: thickness, coverage, and roughness, of marine biofilms interact with viscoelasticity and therefore implicate drag. This relationship was reported using a meso-scale flow cell with an integrated pressure drop system in conjunction with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) which enabled deformation behaviour to be captured in-situ in real-time whilst simultaneously measuring drag (expressed as a friction coefficient). To build on rigid conventional models, a material sandpaper system with a tailored mechanical profile and surface roughness was proposed. The results showed that, over a Reynolds number range of 1.2 × 104 to 5.2 × 104, an elastomeric sandpaper system caused up to a 52 % higher drag and produced a different drag curve when compared to rigid alternatives of equivalent roughness; differences were attributed to differences in the mechanical response to increasing shear. Similar drag curves were also found for marine biofilms grown at Hartlepool Marina (UK) under hydrodynamic conditions and using OCT it was revealed that viscoelastic behaviour (such as deformation and streamer behaviour) was, in part, responsible for the deviation from rigid drag trends. From the experimental model, and from marine biofilm testing, it was concluded that viscoelasticity plays a critical role in drag production, displays a relationship with structural properties and should not be neglected when estimating biofilm-associated drag by using rigid rough models. Marine biofilms grow on different surfaces, for example on different coatings, or under varying hydrodynamic conditions which likely alter biofilm physico-mechanics and implicate drag.
Despite this, marine biofilm viscoelasticity has not been previously quantified in the literature. Here, marine biofilms were cultivated across different surfaces in-field and were rheologically characterised using a parallel-plate rheometer. An OCT was utilised to capture biofilm structure and to further investigate links between biofilm structure and mechanics under different conditions. This Thesis confirmed that marine biofilms are viscoelastic, with a shear modulus ranging from 11 Pa to 7500 Pa depending on growth conditions. For example, biofilms grown under a low flow velocity were softer, thinner, experienced greater structural disruption and produced a 5.7 % higher drag (over a Reynolds number range of 1.2 × 104 to 5.2 × 104) than biofilms grown under a higher flow. In this work it has been emphasised how marine biofilms exhibit dynamic physico-mechanical behaviour when exposed to shear and how elastomeric materials could be better suited for mimicking biofilm-associated drag. The results presented offer insight into the complex and dynamic interactions between biofilm properties and how different surface or growth conditions can alter these relationships. In the long term, this data could be used to improve estimations of biofilm-associated drag and support the development of future marine coatings for targeting drag-producing properties, such as viscoelasticity.
University of Southampton
Snowdon, Alexandra
12d3e8c5-fd0d-43c3-8914-8685f0f68d27
Snowdon, Alexandra
12d3e8c5-fd0d-43c3-8914-8685f0f68d27
Wharton, Julian
965a38fd-d2bc-4a19-a08c-2d4e036aa96b
Stoodley, Paul
0135ea85-d229-4265-b154-3a70e209a0ec
Longyear, Jennifer E.
106d207b-f9b7-4942-8e2a-5146bca27ad4
Dennington, Simon
6a329a55-8c10-4515-8920-d8f40f302221

Snowdon, Alexandra (2023) Developing artificial biofilms for investigating the effects of physico-mechanical properties on marine biofilm-associated drag. nCATS Group, Doctoral Thesis, 208pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Marine biofilms cause a significant increase in drag on ships. From the current literature it is understood that physical and mechanical (physico-mechanical) properties of biofilms influence drag, yet it remains understudied. In part, this is explicable by biofilm heterogeneity and adaptability which complicate efforts to link biofilm properties to frictional drag. As a result, rigid and homogeneous structures are typically used as the benchmark for studying biofilm-associated drag, but as they neglect natural biofilm behaviour, such as viscoelasticity, they could be causing underestimations in drag predictions. To improve drag predictions there is a need to better understand biofilm fluid-structure interactions and the role these play in drag production. In the current work, it was shown that mesoscopic structural properties: thickness, coverage, and roughness, of marine biofilms interact with viscoelasticity and therefore implicate drag. This relationship was reported using a meso-scale flow cell with an integrated pressure drop system in conjunction with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) which enabled deformation behaviour to be captured in-situ in real-time whilst simultaneously measuring drag (expressed as a friction coefficient). To build on rigid conventional models, a material sandpaper system with a tailored mechanical profile and surface roughness was proposed. The results showed that, over a Reynolds number range of 1.2 × 104 to 5.2 × 104, an elastomeric sandpaper system caused up to a 52 % higher drag and produced a different drag curve when compared to rigid alternatives of equivalent roughness; differences were attributed to differences in the mechanical response to increasing shear. Similar drag curves were also found for marine biofilms grown at Hartlepool Marina (UK) under hydrodynamic conditions and using OCT it was revealed that viscoelastic behaviour (such as deformation and streamer behaviour) was, in part, responsible for the deviation from rigid drag trends. From the experimental model, and from marine biofilm testing, it was concluded that viscoelasticity plays a critical role in drag production, displays a relationship with structural properties and should not be neglected when estimating biofilm-associated drag by using rigid rough models. Marine biofilms grow on different surfaces, for example on different coatings, or under varying hydrodynamic conditions which likely alter biofilm physico-mechanics and implicate drag.
Despite this, marine biofilm viscoelasticity has not been previously quantified in the literature. Here, marine biofilms were cultivated across different surfaces in-field and were rheologically characterised using a parallel-plate rheometer. An OCT was utilised to capture biofilm structure and to further investigate links between biofilm structure and mechanics under different conditions. This Thesis confirmed that marine biofilms are viscoelastic, with a shear modulus ranging from 11 Pa to 7500 Pa depending on growth conditions. For example, biofilms grown under a low flow velocity were softer, thinner, experienced greater structural disruption and produced a 5.7 % higher drag (over a Reynolds number range of 1.2 × 104 to 5.2 × 104) than biofilms grown under a higher flow. In this work it has been emphasised how marine biofilms exhibit dynamic physico-mechanical behaviour when exposed to shear and how elastomeric materials could be better suited for mimicking biofilm-associated drag. The results presented offer insight into the complex and dynamic interactions between biofilm properties and how different surface or growth conditions can alter these relationships. In the long term, this data could be used to improve estimations of biofilm-associated drag and support the development of future marine coatings for targeting drag-producing properties, such as viscoelasticity.

Text
AlexandraSnowdon_Thesis_MarineBiofilmAssociatedDrag_June2023_PDF-A - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (10MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mrs-Alexandra-Snowdon (1)
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: June 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477919
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477919
PURE UUID: f7a398de-e8f5-42f9-85fb-26089c583c00
ORCID for Alexandra Snowdon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-937X
ORCID for Julian Wharton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3439-017X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jun 2023 16:38
Last modified: 23 Mar 2024 02:36

Export record

Contributors

Author: Alexandra Snowdon ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Julian Wharton ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Paul Stoodley
Thesis advisor: Jennifer E. Longyear
Thesis advisor: Simon Dennington

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×