Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience
Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience
Background: patients with genetic cancer susceptibility are presented with complex management options involving difficult decisions, for example about genetic testing, treatment, screening and risk-reducing surgery/medications. This review sought to explore the experience of patients using decision support resources in this context, and the impact on decision-making outcomes.
Methods: systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies involving adults with or without cancer who used a decision support resource pre- or post-genetic test for any cancer susceptibility. To gather a broad view of existing resources and gaps for development, digital or paper-based patient resources were included and not limited to decision aids. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise patient impact and experience.
Results: thirty-six publications describing 27 resources were included. Heterogeneity of resources and outcome measurements highlighted the multiple modes of resource delivery and personal tailoring acceptable to and valued by patients. Impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes was mixed, but mainly positive. Findings suggested clear potential for quality patient-facing resources to be acceptable and useful.
Conclusions: decision support resources about genetic cancer susceptibility are likely useful to support decision-making, but should be co-designed with patients according to evidence-based frameworks. More research is needed to study impact and outcomes, particularly in terms of longer term follow-up to identify whether patients follow through on decisions and whether any increased distress is transient. Innovative, streamlined resources are needed to scale up delivery of genetic cancer susceptibility testing for patients with cancer in mainstream oncology clinics. Tailored patient-facing decision aids should also be made available to patients identified as carriers of a pathogenic gene variant that increases future cancer risks, to complement traditional genetic counselling.
Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020220460, identifier: CRD42020220460.
1092816
Kohut, Kelly
62c06d25-2359-4a2a-a155-a54a8937fd8b
Morton, Kate
9981c3b0-8602-48ea-b9de-58592f5483a1
Turner, Lesley
171a4d9d-bebd-421c-aee8-c6a70e2840b7
Shepherd, Jonathan
dfbca97a-9307-4eee-bdf7-e27bcb02bc67
Fenerty, Vicky
645aa773-d78e-40fa-88b3-532682f7c115
Woods, Lois
8149aa11-7664-4052-a18b-98f7bde83180
Grimmett, Chloe
7f27e85b-2850-481d-a7dd-2835e1a925cd
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73
31 May 2023
Kohut, Kelly
62c06d25-2359-4a2a-a155-a54a8937fd8b
Morton, Kate
9981c3b0-8602-48ea-b9de-58592f5483a1
Turner, Lesley
171a4d9d-bebd-421c-aee8-c6a70e2840b7
Shepherd, Jonathan
dfbca97a-9307-4eee-bdf7-e27bcb02bc67
Fenerty, Vicky
645aa773-d78e-40fa-88b3-532682f7c115
Woods, Lois
8149aa11-7664-4052-a18b-98f7bde83180
Grimmett, Chloe
7f27e85b-2850-481d-a7dd-2835e1a925cd
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Foster, Claire
00786ac1-bd47-4aeb-a0e2-40e058695b73
Kohut, Kelly, Morton, Kate, Turner, Lesley, Shepherd, Jonathan, Fenerty, Vicky, Woods, Lois, Grimmett, Chloe, Eccles, Diana M. and Foster, Claire
(2023)
Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience.
Frontiers in Health Services, 3, .
(doi:10.3389/frhs.2023.1092816).
Abstract
Background: patients with genetic cancer susceptibility are presented with complex management options involving difficult decisions, for example about genetic testing, treatment, screening and risk-reducing surgery/medications. This review sought to explore the experience of patients using decision support resources in this context, and the impact on decision-making outcomes.
Methods: systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies involving adults with or without cancer who used a decision support resource pre- or post-genetic test for any cancer susceptibility. To gather a broad view of existing resources and gaps for development, digital or paper-based patient resources were included and not limited to decision aids. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise patient impact and experience.
Results: thirty-six publications describing 27 resources were included. Heterogeneity of resources and outcome measurements highlighted the multiple modes of resource delivery and personal tailoring acceptable to and valued by patients. Impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes was mixed, but mainly positive. Findings suggested clear potential for quality patient-facing resources to be acceptable and useful.
Conclusions: decision support resources about genetic cancer susceptibility are likely useful to support decision-making, but should be co-designed with patients according to evidence-based frameworks. More research is needed to study impact and outcomes, particularly in terms of longer term follow-up to identify whether patients follow through on decisions and whether any increased distress is transient. Innovative, streamlined resources are needed to scale up delivery of genetic cancer susceptibility testing for patients with cancer in mainstream oncology clinics. Tailored patient-facing decision aids should also be made available to patients identified as carriers of a pathogenic gene variant that increases future cancer risks, to complement traditional genetic counselling.
Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020220460, identifier: CRD42020220460.
Archive
OneDrive_1_16-06-2023
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
frhs-03-1092816
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 April 2023
Published date: 31 May 2023
Additional Information:
© 2023 Kohut, Morton, Turner, Shepherd, Fenerty, Woods, Grimmett, Eccles and Foster.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 478405
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478405
ISSN: 2813-0146
PURE UUID: 7d94ea94-3b2a-4657-9b3c-aa394ded689f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Jun 2023 16:33
Last modified: 11 Sep 2024 02:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Kelly Kohut
Author:
Kate Morton
Author:
Lesley Turner
Author:
Vicky Fenerty
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics