Perceived partner phubbing predicts lower relationship quality but partners’ enacted phubbing does not
Perceived partner phubbing predicts lower relationship quality but partners’ enacted phubbing does not
Perceptions of partner phubbing can be detrimental for romantic relationship functioning. However, research does not typically focus on couple members’ reports of their own phubbing behavior and how this relates to relationship functioning. Our aim was to examine both perceptions of partner phubbing and reports of one’s own enacted phubbing behavior in a dyadic diary dataset to better specify their effects on relationship functioning at the daily level and two months later. The role of attachment was also examined. Daily perceived phubbing was associated with lower relationship quality; however, these effects did not hold two months later. Importantly, actors’ and partners’ enacted phubbing was unrelated to relationship quality both daily and two months later. Attachment anxiety and avoidance moderated the above results, although the directions of these effects were not always consistent across models or with previous findings or theorizing. Future research is needed to untangle if and how attachment orientations are reliably linked to phubbing. Together our results suggest that perceptions about partner’s phubbing are more important than partners’ actual phubbing behavior. Future research should appraise the potential of targeting phubbing perceptions to improve relationship functioning.
attachment, dyadic data, longitudinal, phubbing, relationships, technoference, Dyadic data, Relationships, Longitudinal, Phubbing, Technoference, Attachment
Carnelley, Katherine B.
02a55020-a0bc-480e-a0ff-c8fe56ee9c36
Vowels, Laura M.
b34cebde-0e97-4f39-8c48-874f6555a52b
Stanton, Sarah C.E.
0f493ef3-6dc7-411f-850a-31d668dc90e1
Millings, Abigail
0d9ae41e-0c84-4b8c-ba39-6ed21384623f
Hart, Claire M.
e3db9c72-f493-439c-a358-b3b482d55103
October 2023
Carnelley, Katherine B.
02a55020-a0bc-480e-a0ff-c8fe56ee9c36
Vowels, Laura M.
b34cebde-0e97-4f39-8c48-874f6555a52b
Stanton, Sarah C.E.
0f493ef3-6dc7-411f-850a-31d668dc90e1
Millings, Abigail
0d9ae41e-0c84-4b8c-ba39-6ed21384623f
Hart, Claire M.
e3db9c72-f493-439c-a358-b3b482d55103
Carnelley, Katherine B., Vowels, Laura M., Stanton, Sarah C.E., Millings, Abigail and Hart, Claire M.
(2023)
Perceived partner phubbing predicts lower relationship quality but partners’ enacted phubbing does not.
Computers in Human Behavior, 147, [107860].
(doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107860).
Abstract
Perceptions of partner phubbing can be detrimental for romantic relationship functioning. However, research does not typically focus on couple members’ reports of their own phubbing behavior and how this relates to relationship functioning. Our aim was to examine both perceptions of partner phubbing and reports of one’s own enacted phubbing behavior in a dyadic diary dataset to better specify their effects on relationship functioning at the daily level and two months later. The role of attachment was also examined. Daily perceived phubbing was associated with lower relationship quality; however, these effects did not hold two months later. Importantly, actors’ and partners’ enacted phubbing was unrelated to relationship quality both daily and two months later. Attachment anxiety and avoidance moderated the above results, although the directions of these effects were not always consistent across models or with previous findings or theorizing. Future research is needed to untangle if and how attachment orientations are reliably linked to phubbing. Together our results suggest that perceptions about partner’s phubbing are more important than partners’ actual phubbing behavior. Future research should appraise the potential of targeting phubbing perceptions to improve relationship functioning.
Text
CHB_Manuscript without Author Details Revision2 062123
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
1-s2.0-S074756322300211X-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 23 June 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 June 2023
Published date: October 2023
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This research was supported by New Investigator Grant ES/S005749/1 awarded to Sarah C. E. Stanton by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) of the United Kingdom. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
Keywords:
attachment, dyadic data, longitudinal, phubbing, relationships, technoference, Dyadic data, Relationships, Longitudinal, Phubbing, Technoference, Attachment
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 478627
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/478627
ISSN: 0747-5632
PURE UUID: 50c0098b-27d1-4a7f-bf47-613ebdd978eb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jul 2023 16:31
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Laura M. Vowels
Author:
Sarah C.E. Stanton
Author:
Abigail Millings
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics