The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Global evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP continental hydrological system. Part I: comparison to GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates and in situ river discharges

Global evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP continental hydrological system. Part I: comparison to GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates and in situ river discharges
Global evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP continental hydrological system. Part I: comparison to GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates and in situ river discharges

In earth system models, the partitioning of precipitation among the variations of continental water storage, evapotranspiration, and freshwater runoff to the ocean has a major influence on the terrestrial water and energy budgets and thereby on simulated climate on a wide range of scales. The evaluation of continental hydrology is therefore a crucial task that requires offline simulations driven by realistic atmospheric forcing to avoid the systematic biases commonly found in global atmospheric models. Generally, this evaluation is done mainly by comparison with in situ river discharge data, which does not guarantee that the spatiotemporal distribution of water storage and evapotranspiration is correctly simulated. In this context, the Interactions between Soil, Biosphere, and Atmosphere-Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (ISBA-TRIP) continental hydrological system of the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques is evaluated by using the additional constraint of terrestrial water storage (TWS) variations derived from three independent gravity field retrievals (datasets) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). On the one hand, the results show that, in general, ISBA-TRIP captures the seasonal and the interannual variability in both TWS and discharges. GRACE provides an additional constraint on the simulated hydrology and consolidates the former evaluation only based on river discharge observations. On the other hand, results indicate that river storage variations represent a significant contribution to GRACE measurements. While this remark highlights the need to improve the TRIP river routing model for a more useful comparison with GRACE [Decharme et al. (Part II of the present study)], it also suggests that low-resolution gravimetry products do not necessarily represent a strong additional constraint for model evaluation, especially in downstream areas of large river basins where long-term discharge data are available.

1525-755X
583-600
Alkama, R.
4e818b1e-7ade-4233-b1f9-d0901a5f25b4
Decharme, B.
3bf27992-c623-4728-8877-ebb540f2b18e
Douville, H.
8228b0d8-bf09-433b-9492-35095283ddb0
Becker, M.
3f13beba-12bc-4fed-a87f-99c619cb770c
Cazenave, A.
e557878c-4c34-43b5-8964-171e8564741c
Sheffield, J.
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Voldoire, A.
fe3d57d1-2742-4de3-93ec-78fb2b514567
Tyteca, S.
f3772e36-8563-49cc-8888-bb886cce89d6
Le Moigne, P.
a3e4a6ab-253f-4af1-a414-66e57bf2a7dd
Alkama, R.
4e818b1e-7ade-4233-b1f9-d0901a5f25b4
Decharme, B.
3bf27992-c623-4728-8877-ebb540f2b18e
Douville, H.
8228b0d8-bf09-433b-9492-35095283ddb0
Becker, M.
3f13beba-12bc-4fed-a87f-99c619cb770c
Cazenave, A.
e557878c-4c34-43b5-8964-171e8564741c
Sheffield, J.
dd66575b-a4dc-4190-ad95-df2d6aaaaa6b
Voldoire, A.
fe3d57d1-2742-4de3-93ec-78fb2b514567
Tyteca, S.
f3772e36-8563-49cc-8888-bb886cce89d6
Le Moigne, P.
a3e4a6ab-253f-4af1-a414-66e57bf2a7dd

Alkama, R., Decharme, B., Douville, H., Becker, M., Cazenave, A., Sheffield, J., Voldoire, A., Tyteca, S. and Le Moigne, P. (2010) Global evaluation of the ISBA-TRIP continental hydrological system. Part I: comparison to GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates and in situ river discharges. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 11 (3), 583-600. (doi:10.1175/2010JHM1211.1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In earth system models, the partitioning of precipitation among the variations of continental water storage, evapotranspiration, and freshwater runoff to the ocean has a major influence on the terrestrial water and energy budgets and thereby on simulated climate on a wide range of scales. The evaluation of continental hydrology is therefore a crucial task that requires offline simulations driven by realistic atmospheric forcing to avoid the systematic biases commonly found in global atmospheric models. Generally, this evaluation is done mainly by comparison with in situ river discharge data, which does not guarantee that the spatiotemporal distribution of water storage and evapotranspiration is correctly simulated. In this context, the Interactions between Soil, Biosphere, and Atmosphere-Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (ISBA-TRIP) continental hydrological system of the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques is evaluated by using the additional constraint of terrestrial water storage (TWS) variations derived from three independent gravity field retrievals (datasets) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). On the one hand, the results show that, in general, ISBA-TRIP captures the seasonal and the interannual variability in both TWS and discharges. GRACE provides an additional constraint on the simulated hydrology and consolidates the former evaluation only based on river discharge observations. On the other hand, results indicate that river storage variations represent a significant contribution to GRACE measurements. While this remark highlights the need to improve the TRIP river routing model for a more useful comparison with GRACE [Decharme et al. (Part II of the present study)], it also suggests that low-resolution gravimetry products do not necessarily represent a strong additional constraint for model evaluation, especially in downstream areas of large river basins where long-term discharge data are available.

Text
hydr-2010jhm1211_1 - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (6MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 January 2010
Published date: 1 June 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 480835
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/480835
ISSN: 1525-755X
PURE UUID: e4aa042b-c58a-4176-808a-6d8fe857b935
ORCID for J. Sheffield: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-0630

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Aug 2023 16:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R. Alkama
Author: B. Decharme
Author: H. Douville
Author: M. Becker
Author: A. Cazenave
Author: J. Sheffield ORCID iD
Author: A. Voldoire
Author: S. Tyteca
Author: P. Le Moigne

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×