The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis

What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis
What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis

Background: A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy). Conducting medication reviews in primary care is key to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Recent recommendations for effective deprescribing include shared-decision making and a multidisciplinary approach. Our aim was to understand when, why, and how interventions for medication review and deprescribing in primary care involving multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) work (or do not work) for older people. Methods: A realist synthesis following the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards guidelines was completed. A scoping literature review informed the generation of an initial programme theory. Systematic searches of different databases were conducted, and documents screened for eligibility, with data extracted based on a Context, Mechanisms, Outcome (CMO) configuration to develop further our programme theory. Documents were appraised based on assessments of relevance and rigour. A Stakeholder consultation with 26 primary care health care professionals (HCPs), 10 patients and three informal carers was conducted to test and refine the programme theory. Data synthesis was underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory to identify key mechanisms to enhance the implementation of MDT medication review and deprescribing in primary care. Findings: A total of 2821 abstracts and 175 full-text documents were assessed for eligibility, with 28 included. Analysis of documents alongside stakeholder consultation outlined 33 CMO configurations categorised under four themes: 1) HCPs roles, responsibilities and relationships; 2) HCPs training and education; 3) the format and process of the medication review 4) involvement and education of patients and informal carers. A number of key mechanisms were identified including clearly defined roles and good communication between MDT members, integration of pharmacists in the team, simulation-based training or team building training, targeting high-risk patients, using deprescribing tools and drawing on expertise of other HCPs (e.g., nurses and frailty practitioners), involving patents and carers in the process, starting with ‘quick wins’, offering deprescribing as ‘drug holidays’, and ensuring appropriate and tailored follow-up plans that allow continuity of care and management. Conclusion: We identified key mechanisms that could inform the design of future interventions and services that successfully embed deprescribing in primary care.

Deprescribing, Medicines optimisation, Multidisciplinary team, Older people, Polypharmacy, Primary care, Realist review
1471-2318
Radcliffe, Eloise
4bbec31f-dadd-4b7d-95c4-7d96a5ec8659
Servin, Renee
a530e1dd-ccd6-4708-a3ab-8707c0d00236
Cox, Natalie
dfdfbc5f-41b8-4329-a4b5-87b6e93aa09e
Lim, Stephen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Tan, Qian Yue
6a31c582-c5f8-4d80-b466-b27da2700069
Howard, Clare
0c176f99-dbed-4af8-8134-9f6d8b855137
Sheikh, Claire J.
eab31d73-d098-4dce-9d0c-3254f3db277c
Rutter, Paul
162ac51a-8770-4b6f-a95f-d8dd5effe706
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Lown, Mark
4742d5f8-bcf3-4e0b-811c-920e7d010c9b
Brad, Lawrence
ea3efe02-d916-4493-b93c-57819db4fc28
Fraser, Simon D.S.
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Roberts, Helen C.
5ea688b1-ef7a-4173-9da0-26290e18f253
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Radcliffe, Eloise
4bbec31f-dadd-4b7d-95c4-7d96a5ec8659
Servin, Renee
a530e1dd-ccd6-4708-a3ab-8707c0d00236
Cox, Natalie
dfdfbc5f-41b8-4329-a4b5-87b6e93aa09e
Lim, Stephen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Tan, Qian Yue
6a31c582-c5f8-4d80-b466-b27da2700069
Howard, Clare
0c176f99-dbed-4af8-8134-9f6d8b855137
Sheikh, Claire J.
eab31d73-d098-4dce-9d0c-3254f3db277c
Rutter, Paul
162ac51a-8770-4b6f-a95f-d8dd5effe706
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Lown, Mark
4742d5f8-bcf3-4e0b-811c-920e7d010c9b
Brad, Lawrence
ea3efe02-d916-4493-b93c-57819db4fc28
Fraser, Simon D.S.
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Roberts, Helen C.
5ea688b1-ef7a-4173-9da0-26290e18f253
Recio Saucedo, Alejandra
d05c4e43-3399-466d-99e0-01403a04b467
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294

Radcliffe, Eloise, Servin, Renee, Cox, Natalie, Lim, Stephen, Tan, Qian Yue, Howard, Clare, Sheikh, Claire J., Rutter, Paul, Latter, Sue, Lown, Mark, Brad, Lawrence, Fraser, Simon D.S., Bradbury, Katherine, Roberts, Helen C., Recio Saucedo, Alejandra and Ibrahim, Kinda (2023) What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis. BMC Geriatrics, 23 (591), [591]. (doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04256-8).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy). Conducting medication reviews in primary care is key to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Recent recommendations for effective deprescribing include shared-decision making and a multidisciplinary approach. Our aim was to understand when, why, and how interventions for medication review and deprescribing in primary care involving multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) work (or do not work) for older people. Methods: A realist synthesis following the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards guidelines was completed. A scoping literature review informed the generation of an initial programme theory. Systematic searches of different databases were conducted, and documents screened for eligibility, with data extracted based on a Context, Mechanisms, Outcome (CMO) configuration to develop further our programme theory. Documents were appraised based on assessments of relevance and rigour. A Stakeholder consultation with 26 primary care health care professionals (HCPs), 10 patients and three informal carers was conducted to test and refine the programme theory. Data synthesis was underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory to identify key mechanisms to enhance the implementation of MDT medication review and deprescribing in primary care. Findings: A total of 2821 abstracts and 175 full-text documents were assessed for eligibility, with 28 included. Analysis of documents alongside stakeholder consultation outlined 33 CMO configurations categorised under four themes: 1) HCPs roles, responsibilities and relationships; 2) HCPs training and education; 3) the format and process of the medication review 4) involvement and education of patients and informal carers. A number of key mechanisms were identified including clearly defined roles and good communication between MDT members, integration of pharmacists in the team, simulation-based training or team building training, targeting high-risk patients, using deprescribing tools and drawing on expertise of other HCPs (e.g., nurses and frailty practitioners), involving patents and carers in the process, starting with ‘quick wins’, offering deprescribing as ‘drug holidays’, and ensuring appropriate and tailored follow-up plans that allow continuity of care and management. Conclusion: We identified key mechanisms that could inform the design of future interventions and services that successfully embed deprescribing in primary care.

Text
V2 MODIFY Realist review 30.6.23 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
MODIFY Realist review accepted version 10.8.23 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (392kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 August 2023
Published date: 25 September 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: Stephen Lim is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Advanced Fellowship. Funding Information: Qian Yue Tan is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. © 2023. The Author(s).
Keywords: Deprescribing, Medicines optimisation, Multidisciplinary team, Older people, Polypharmacy, Primary care, Realist review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 481858
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/481858
ISSN: 1471-2318
PURE UUID: 8233cd67-aa1c-487d-947d-fbe331fb0d6e
ORCID for Natalie Cox: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-1206
ORCID for Stephen Lim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-2362
ORCID for Sue Latter: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-0512
ORCID for Mark Lown: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8309-568X
ORCID for Simon D.S. Fraser: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-4406
ORCID for Katherine Bradbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571
ORCID for Helen C. Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5291-1880
ORCID for Alejandra Recio Saucedo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-4573
ORCID for Kinda Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Sep 2023 17:06
Last modified: 24 Apr 2024 02:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Renee Servin
Author: Natalie Cox ORCID iD
Author: Stephen Lim ORCID iD
Author: Qian Yue Tan
Author: Clare Howard
Author: Claire J. Sheikh
Author: Paul Rutter
Author: Sue Latter ORCID iD
Author: Mark Lown ORCID iD
Author: Lawrence Brad
Author: Kinda Ibrahim ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×