Estimating heterogeneity variance under sparsity
Estimating heterogeneity variance under sparsity
Meta-analysis has become the gold standard in medical research analysis. The random effects model is generally the preferred method to conduct a meta-analysis, as it incorporates between-study heterogeneity - the variability between study estimates as a result of differences in study characteristics. Several methods to estimate the heterogeneity variance parameter in this model have been proposed, including the popular DerSimonian-Laird estimator, which has been shown to produce negatively biased estimates, performing well only in scenarios not seen in real-life data. Many medical meta-analyses are concerned with rare-event data, where event probabilities are so low that often a small number or zero events are observed in the studies. Examples of this include adverse drug reactions in a clinical trial or very rare diseases in epidemiological studies, where as few as 1 in 1000 people may be affected by the outcome of interest. In such cases, most pre-proposed heterogeneity variance estimators perform poorly, and standard analysis techniques can result in the incorrect estimation of overall treatment effect. In this thesis, we propose novel methods that we believe are appropriate for the estimation of heterogeneity variance in the case of rare-event data. These are based on generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs), and use the Poisson mixed regression model and the conditional logistic mixed regression model. We conducted a simulation study to compare our novel approaches with a selection of existing heterogeneity variance estimators for use in random-effect binary outcome meta-analyses. From the results of our simulation study, which agree with results given in previous studies, we found that our novel GLMM-based estimating methods outperform existing methods in terms of the estimation of heterogeneity variance and summary log-risk ratio. This is the case when study sample sizes in the meta-analysis are balanced or unbalanced, and thus we recommend them for use with rare-event data.
University of Southampton
Martin, Susan
57c869c0-9a02-473b-ad80-f20d5e6dd363
31 March 2020
Martin, Susan
57c869c0-9a02-473b-ad80-f20d5e6dd363
Böhning, Dankmar
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Martin, Susan
(2020)
Estimating heterogeneity variance under sparsity.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 487pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Meta-analysis has become the gold standard in medical research analysis. The random effects model is generally the preferred method to conduct a meta-analysis, as it incorporates between-study heterogeneity - the variability between study estimates as a result of differences in study characteristics. Several methods to estimate the heterogeneity variance parameter in this model have been proposed, including the popular DerSimonian-Laird estimator, which has been shown to produce negatively biased estimates, performing well only in scenarios not seen in real-life data. Many medical meta-analyses are concerned with rare-event data, where event probabilities are so low that often a small number or zero events are observed in the studies. Examples of this include adverse drug reactions in a clinical trial or very rare diseases in epidemiological studies, where as few as 1 in 1000 people may be affected by the outcome of interest. In such cases, most pre-proposed heterogeneity variance estimators perform poorly, and standard analysis techniques can result in the incorrect estimation of overall treatment effect. In this thesis, we propose novel methods that we believe are appropriate for the estimation of heterogeneity variance in the case of rare-event data. These are based on generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs), and use the Poisson mixed regression model and the conditional logistic mixed regression model. We conducted a simulation study to compare our novel approaches with a selection of existing heterogeneity variance estimators for use in random-effect binary outcome meta-analyses. From the results of our simulation study, which agree with results given in previous studies, we found that our novel GLMM-based estimating methods outperform existing methods in terms of the estimation of heterogeneity variance and summary log-risk ratio. This is the case when study sample sizes in the meta-analysis are balanced or unbalanced, and thus we recommend them for use with rare-event data.
Text
e_Thesis_SusanMartin 080923
- Version of Record
Text
Permission_to_deposit_thesis_form_SusanMartin(1)
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 31 March 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 483000
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483000
PURE UUID: 3cb5412b-b78b-4756-9a94-f7308a49cc71
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Oct 2023 16:45
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:19
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Susan Martin
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics