The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Gastric residual volume monitoring practices in UK intensive care units: a web-based survey

Gastric residual volume monitoring practices in UK intensive care units: a web-based survey
Gastric residual volume monitoring practices in UK intensive care units: a web-based survey

Background and aim: Monitoring of gastric residual volume (GRV) to assess for enteral feeding intolerance is common practice in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting; however, evidence to support the practice is lacking. The aim of this study was: (i) to gain a perspective of current practice in adult ICUs in the UK around enteral feeding and monitoring of GRV, (ii) to characterise the threshold value used for a high GRV in clinical practice, (iii) to describe the impact of GRV monitoring on enteral feeding provision and (iv) to inform future research into the clinical value of GRV measurement in the adult ICU population. Methods: A web-based survey was sent to all UK adult ICUs. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to (i) nutritional assessment and enteral feeding practices, (ii) enteral feeding intolerance and GRV monitoring and (iii) management of raised GRV. Results: Responses were received from 101 units. Ninety-eight percent of units reported routinely measuring GRV, with 86% of ICUs using GRV to define enteral feeding intolerance. Threshold values for a high GRV varied from 200 to 1000 ml with frequency of measurement also differing greatly from 2 to 12 hourly. Initiation of pro-kinetic medication was the most common treatment for a high GRV. Fifty-two percent of respondents stated that volume of GRV would influence their decision to stop enteral feeds a lot or very much. Only 28% of units stated that they had guidelines for the technique for monitoring GRV. Conclusions: Measurement of GRV is the most common method of determining enteral feeding intolerance in adult ICUs in the UK. The practice continues despite evidence of poor validity and reproducibility of this measurement. Further research should be undertaken into the benefit of ongoing GRV measurements in the adult ICU population and alternative markers of enteral feeding intolerance.

Enteral feeding, critically ill, gastric residual volumes, tolerance
1751-1437
Jenkins, Bethan
ed7a7ed9-8725-424e-86df-efc1f81d5aba
Calder, Philip
1797e54f-378e-4dcb-80a4-3e30018f07a6
Marino, Luise
c479400f-9424-4879-9ca6-d81e6351de26
Jenkins, Bethan
ed7a7ed9-8725-424e-86df-efc1f81d5aba
Calder, Philip
1797e54f-378e-4dcb-80a4-3e30018f07a6
Marino, Luise
c479400f-9424-4879-9ca6-d81e6351de26

Jenkins, Bethan, Calder, Philip and Marino, Luise (2023) Gastric residual volume monitoring practices in UK intensive care units: a web-based survey. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. (doi:10.1177/17511437231210483).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and aim: Monitoring of gastric residual volume (GRV) to assess for enteral feeding intolerance is common practice in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting; however, evidence to support the practice is lacking. The aim of this study was: (i) to gain a perspective of current practice in adult ICUs in the UK around enteral feeding and monitoring of GRV, (ii) to characterise the threshold value used for a high GRV in clinical practice, (iii) to describe the impact of GRV monitoring on enteral feeding provision and (iv) to inform future research into the clinical value of GRV measurement in the adult ICU population. Methods: A web-based survey was sent to all UK adult ICUs. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to (i) nutritional assessment and enteral feeding practices, (ii) enteral feeding intolerance and GRV monitoring and (iii) management of raised GRV. Results: Responses were received from 101 units. Ninety-eight percent of units reported routinely measuring GRV, with 86% of ICUs using GRV to define enteral feeding intolerance. Threshold values for a high GRV varied from 200 to 1000 ml with frequency of measurement also differing greatly from 2 to 12 hourly. Initiation of pro-kinetic medication was the most common treatment for a high GRV. Fifty-two percent of respondents stated that volume of GRV would influence their decision to stop enteral feeds a lot or very much. Only 28% of units stated that they had guidelines for the technique for monitoring GRV. Conclusions: Measurement of GRV is the most common method of determining enteral feeding intolerance in adult ICUs in the UK. The practice continues despite evidence of poor validity and reproducibility of this measurement. Further research should be undertaken into the benefit of ongoing GRV measurements in the adult ICU population and alternative markers of enteral feeding intolerance.

Text
GRV Monitoring Practices in UK ICU_review 3_no track change - Accepted Manuscript
Download (205kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 September 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 November 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Bethan Jenkins, Pre-Doctoral Clinical Academic Fellow (NIHR301168) is funded by Health Education England (HEE)/National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) for this research project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. Luise Marino is supported by the Research Leaders Programme, Southampton Academy of Research, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust. Publisher Copyright: © The Intensive Care Society 2023.
Keywords: Enteral feeding, critically ill, gastric residual volumes, tolerance

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483007
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483007
ISSN: 1751-1437
PURE UUID: f3e2e3f9-5ca8-4dd4-be9f-17240fc5037b
ORCID for Philip Calder: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6038-710X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Oct 2023 16:35
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bethan Jenkins
Author: Philip Calder ORCID iD
Author: Luise Marino

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×