The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Monitoring the efficacy of nature-based solutions for diffuse pollution mitigation in a lowland catchment

Monitoring the efficacy of nature-based solutions for diffuse pollution mitigation in a lowland catchment
Monitoring the efficacy of nature-based solutions for diffuse pollution mitigation in a lowland catchment
Natural Flood Management (NFM) is an increasingly used Nature-based Solution (NBS) for flood risk reduction in the UK. It has been suggested that such NBS may also be able to deliver multiple benefits concerning wider ecosystem services such as improvement of stream water quality. This thesis aims to address the gap in the NFM and NBS evidence-base concerning their potential to deliver multiple benefits through the mitigation of diffuse pollution in a lowland agricultural catchment. Hydrological and water quality monitoring was carried out over multiple years in two small headwater sub-catchments of the Evenlode catchment, a largely rural upper tributary of the river Thames. A number of interventions including online ponds, offline storage areas, and instream leaky barriers were implemented within these sub-catchments as part of the Littlestock Brook NFM pilot scheme, one of the first of its kind in the Thames Basin. Online pond interventions were able to reduce concentrations of dissolved nutrients (nitrate by 5 % and soluble reactive phosphorus by 29 %) and suspended sediment by 32 % during baseflows. During storm events, online ponds were able to attenuate sediment delivery downstream, however they also showed potential to act as sources of sediment in higher-magnitude events. Rapid sediment accumulation rates diminished storage capacity in the upstream-most pond and highlighted the need for frequent sediment removal to maintain functionality. Offline ponds with a primary purpose of temporarily storing water during events were found to provide storage of sediment and nutrients, trapping 47.9 t of sediment over 2-3 years. When combined with accumulations in the online ponds, this was the equivalent of 14.7 % of the suspended sediment yield from the catchment over the same period. Accumulation rates were influenced by hydrological connectivity, with enhanced sediment, phosphorus, and organic carbon capture in offline ponds that filled via overbank flows induced by leaky barriers. Instream monitoring showed that attributing changes in suspended sediment loading to the implementation of NBS was challenging at a sub-catchment scale due to hydroclimatic variability and land cover change. Therefore, future research should aim to adopt long-term, multi-scale monitoring approaches to better assess the efficacy of such interventions for diffuse pollution mitigation. NFM and NBS provide a valuable suite of options for catchment management, however their efficacy is dependent on their design, connectivity, and maintenance. It is recommended that future NBS research focus on upscaling combined effects of interventions to determine the extent to which implementation is needed to improve downstream water quality.
University of Southampton
Robotham, John Nicholas Peter
ad3fdc4e-850f-42a2-894c-be00c05d613d
Robotham, John Nicholas Peter
ad3fdc4e-850f-42a2-894c-be00c05d613d
Shaw, Peter
935dfebf-9fb6-483c-86da-a21dba8c1989
Klaar, Megan J
2fbb3df5-b256-45da-ac04-965d58b03bd3

Robotham, John Nicholas Peter (2023) Monitoring the efficacy of nature-based solutions for diffuse pollution mitigation in a lowland catchment. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 313pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Natural Flood Management (NFM) is an increasingly used Nature-based Solution (NBS) for flood risk reduction in the UK. It has been suggested that such NBS may also be able to deliver multiple benefits concerning wider ecosystem services such as improvement of stream water quality. This thesis aims to address the gap in the NFM and NBS evidence-base concerning their potential to deliver multiple benefits through the mitigation of diffuse pollution in a lowland agricultural catchment. Hydrological and water quality monitoring was carried out over multiple years in two small headwater sub-catchments of the Evenlode catchment, a largely rural upper tributary of the river Thames. A number of interventions including online ponds, offline storage areas, and instream leaky barriers were implemented within these sub-catchments as part of the Littlestock Brook NFM pilot scheme, one of the first of its kind in the Thames Basin. Online pond interventions were able to reduce concentrations of dissolved nutrients (nitrate by 5 % and soluble reactive phosphorus by 29 %) and suspended sediment by 32 % during baseflows. During storm events, online ponds were able to attenuate sediment delivery downstream, however they also showed potential to act as sources of sediment in higher-magnitude events. Rapid sediment accumulation rates diminished storage capacity in the upstream-most pond and highlighted the need for frequent sediment removal to maintain functionality. Offline ponds with a primary purpose of temporarily storing water during events were found to provide storage of sediment and nutrients, trapping 47.9 t of sediment over 2-3 years. When combined with accumulations in the online ponds, this was the equivalent of 14.7 % of the suspended sediment yield from the catchment over the same period. Accumulation rates were influenced by hydrological connectivity, with enhanced sediment, phosphorus, and organic carbon capture in offline ponds that filled via overbank flows induced by leaky barriers. Instream monitoring showed that attributing changes in suspended sediment loading to the implementation of NBS was challenging at a sub-catchment scale due to hydroclimatic variability and land cover change. Therefore, future research should aim to adopt long-term, multi-scale monitoring approaches to better assess the efficacy of such interventions for diffuse pollution mitigation. NFM and NBS provide a valuable suite of options for catchment management, however their efficacy is dependent on their design, connectivity, and maintenance. It is recommended that future NBS research focus on upscaling combined effects of interventions to determine the extent to which implementation is needed to improve downstream water quality.

Text
John Robotham PhD Thesis (PDFA) - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (12MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-John-Robotham
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Submitted date: September 2023
Published date: October 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483076
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483076
PURE UUID: d24f8d66-967b-4dc2-a048-a98e9c0438c2
ORCID for John Nicholas Peter Robotham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1223-8345
ORCID for Peter Shaw: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-5010

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Oct 2023 16:32
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:49

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Peter Shaw ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Megan J Klaar

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×