The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Treatment outcomes with licensed and unlicensed stimulant doses for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment outcomes with licensed and unlicensed stimulant doses for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Treatment outcomes with licensed and unlicensed stimulant doses for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE Stimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamines) are often prescribed at unlicensed doses for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Whether dose escalation beyond US Food and Drug Administration recommendations is associated with positive risk benefits is unclear. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact, based on averages, of stimulant doses on treatment outcomes in adults with ADHD and to determine, based on averages, whether unlicensed doses are associated with positive risk benefits compared with licensed doses. DATA SOURCES Twelve databases, including published (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Sciences) and unpublished (ClinicalTrials.gov) literature, up to February 22, 2023, without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION Two researchers independently screened records to identify double-blinded randomized clinical trials of stimulants against placebo in adults (18 years and older) with ADHD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Aggregate data were extracted and synthesized in random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Change in ADHD symptoms and discontinuations due to adverse events. RESULTS A total of 47 randomized clinical trials (7714 participants; mean age, 35 (SD, 11) years; 4204 male [56%]) were included. For methylphenidate, dose-response curves indicated additional reductions of symptoms with increments in doses, but the gains were progressively smaller and accompanied by continued additional risk of adverse events dropouts. Network meta-analyses showed that unlicensed doses were associated with greater reductions of symptoms compared with licensed doses (standardized mean difference [SMD], −0.23; 95% CI, −0.44 to −0.02; very low certainty of evidence), but the additional gain was small and accompanied by increased risk of adverse event dropouts (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.19-3.43; moderate certainty of evidence). For amphetamines, the dose-response curve approached a plateau and increments in doses did not indicate additional reductions of symptoms, but there were continued increments in the risk of adverse event dropouts. Network meta-analysis did not identify differences between unlicensed and licensed doses for reductions of symptoms (SMD, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.24 to 0.08; very low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Based on group averages, unlicensed doses of stimulants may not have positive risk benefits compared with licensed doses for adults with ADHD. In general, practitioners should consider unlicensed doses cautiously. Practitioners may trial unlicensed doses if needed and tolerated but should be aware that there may not be large gains in the response to the medication with those further increments in dose. However, the findings are averages and will not generalize to every patient.

2168-6238
Farhat, Luis C.
c4eb65e6-7fd3-43ed-891e-3584e83ce20b
Flores, José M.
a2227a0b-ab8c-4326-ab02-49ca5666fa02
Avila-Quintero, Victor J.
b0297f01-33cb-460c-8b32-1fe03672c48c
Polanczyk, Guilherme V.
794ddae7-f894-48fc-a90a-af190ab728a8
Cipriani, Andrea
39423c02-ca41-4c8e-8ad3-a8332abb88e3
Furukawa, Toshi A.
8b4b31b0-c531-49af-a286-0f821fc09720
Bloch, Michael H.
b0629a2d-eef2-4dc4-894f-c1d1779db227
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Farhat, Luis C.
c4eb65e6-7fd3-43ed-891e-3584e83ce20b
Flores, José M.
a2227a0b-ab8c-4326-ab02-49ca5666fa02
Avila-Quintero, Victor J.
b0297f01-33cb-460c-8b32-1fe03672c48c
Polanczyk, Guilherme V.
794ddae7-f894-48fc-a90a-af190ab728a8
Cipriani, Andrea
39423c02-ca41-4c8e-8ad3-a8332abb88e3
Furukawa, Toshi A.
8b4b31b0-c531-49af-a286-0f821fc09720
Bloch, Michael H.
b0629a2d-eef2-4dc4-894f-c1d1779db227
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb

Farhat, Luis C., Flores, José M., Avila-Quintero, Victor J., Polanczyk, Guilherme V., Cipriani, Andrea, Furukawa, Toshi A., Bloch, Michael H. and Cortese, Samuele (2023) Treatment outcomes with licensed and unlicensed stimulant doses for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3985).

Record type: Article

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Stimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamines) are often prescribed at unlicensed doses for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Whether dose escalation beyond US Food and Drug Administration recommendations is associated with positive risk benefits is unclear. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact, based on averages, of stimulant doses on treatment outcomes in adults with ADHD and to determine, based on averages, whether unlicensed doses are associated with positive risk benefits compared with licensed doses. DATA SOURCES Twelve databases, including published (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Sciences) and unpublished (ClinicalTrials.gov) literature, up to February 22, 2023, without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION Two researchers independently screened records to identify double-blinded randomized clinical trials of stimulants against placebo in adults (18 years and older) with ADHD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Aggregate data were extracted and synthesized in random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Change in ADHD symptoms and discontinuations due to adverse events. RESULTS A total of 47 randomized clinical trials (7714 participants; mean age, 35 (SD, 11) years; 4204 male [56%]) were included. For methylphenidate, dose-response curves indicated additional reductions of symptoms with increments in doses, but the gains were progressively smaller and accompanied by continued additional risk of adverse events dropouts. Network meta-analyses showed that unlicensed doses were associated with greater reductions of symptoms compared with licensed doses (standardized mean difference [SMD], −0.23; 95% CI, −0.44 to −0.02; very low certainty of evidence), but the additional gain was small and accompanied by increased risk of adverse event dropouts (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.19-3.43; moderate certainty of evidence). For amphetamines, the dose-response curve approached a plateau and increments in doses did not indicate additional reductions of symptoms, but there were continued increments in the risk of adverse event dropouts. Network meta-analysis did not identify differences between unlicensed and licensed doses for reductions of symptoms (SMD, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.24 to 0.08; very low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Based on group averages, unlicensed doses of stimulants may not have positive risk benefits compared with licensed doses for adults with ADHD. In general, practitioners should consider unlicensed doses cautiously. Practitioners may trial unlicensed doses if needed and tolerated but should be aware that there may not be large gains in the response to the medication with those further increments in dose. However, the findings are averages and will not generalize to every patient.

Text
31609_1_art_file_437283_rx6btc R2 LFac - Accepted Manuscript
Download (85kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 25 October 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: Funding/Support: Dr Cipriani is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Cognitive Health Clinical Research Facility, by an NIHR Research Professorship (RP-2017-08-ST2-006), by the NIHR Oxford and Thames Valley Applied Research Collaboration, by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203316), and by Wellcome (GALENOS project). Dr Cortese is currently supported by funding from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR203684, NIHR203035, NIHR130077, NIHR128472, RP-PG-0618-20003), Solent National Health Service Trust (Research Capability Funding, 2022), University of Southampton (Knowledge and Exchange Enterprise Fund 2023, Enterprise Development Fund 2022), and European Research Agency (Horizon: Project 101095568). Funding Information: Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Polanczyk reported personal fees from Ache, Apsten, Abbott, Medice, and Takeda outside the submitted work. Dr Cipriani reported grants from Angelini Pharma and personal fees from Lundbeck Pharma and Angelini Pharma outside the submitted work. Dr Furukawa reported personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, DT Axis, Kyoto University Original, Sony, and grants from Shionogi and personal fees from Shionogi outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Furukawa had a patents pending (2018-177688 and 2022-082495) and intellectual properties licensed to Mitsubishi-Tanabe. Dr Bloch reported grant or research support from Therapix Biosciences, Emalex, Biosciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, the National Institutes of Health, Lesbian Health Fund, the Yale Foundation for Lesbian and Gay Studies, and Patterson Foundation; he has served on the advisory board/data monitoring and safety board of Therapix Biosciences. Dr Bloch has also received royalties from Wolters Kluwer for Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook, Fifth Edition and moonlighting pay from the Veteran’s Administration. Dr Cortese reported personal fees from Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Canadian ADHD Alliance Resource, British Association of Pharmacology, and Healthcare Convention outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported. Publisher Copyright: © 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485464
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485464
ISSN: 2168-6238
PURE UUID: 01254535-833d-4f04-ab74-b510a87c3018
ORCID for Samuele Cortese: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-8075

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Dec 2023 17:59
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Luis C. Farhat
Author: José M. Flores
Author: Victor J. Avila-Quintero
Author: Guilherme V. Polanczyk
Author: Andrea Cipriani
Author: Toshi A. Furukawa
Author: Michael H. Bloch
Author: Samuele Cortese ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×