The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Does negativity matter under the principle-based approach? Evidence from narrative reporting in the UK

Does negativity matter under the principle-based approach? Evidence from narrative reporting in the UK
Does negativity matter under the principle-based approach? Evidence from narrative reporting in the UK

Purpose: this paper aims to investigate the association between negative tone in annual report narratives and future performance in the UK context. Under the principle-based approach in the UK, managers tend to bias the tone of narrative reports upward, as the reporting regime is more flexible than the rule-based approach in the USA. Consequently, any negative disclosure not mandated by regulators conveys credible information about a firm’s prospects.

Design/methodology/approach: this paper uses a sample of UK FTSE all-share non-financial companies from 2010 to 2019. The authors use the textual-analysis approach based on Loughran and McDonald (2011)’s wordlist (LM) to measure the negative tone in UK annual reports.

Findings: the results show a significant negative association between negative tone and future performance. Moreover, our further analyses suggest that only the negativity in the executive section of the annual disclosures correlates significantly with future performance. In summary, this study suggests that negativity does matter under the principle-based approach and can be used as an indicator of future performance

Originality/value: in contrast to the literature arguing that only positivity has the power to affect a firm’s outcomes under the principle-based approach, the authors provide new empirical evidence suggesting that negativity also matters within the UK context and can be used as an indicator for future performance. Also, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to identify which section of the annual report is more informative about a firm’s future performance.

Firm performance, Narrative disclosure, Negativity, Textual-analysis, United Kingdom
1834-7649
Bassyouny, Hesham
b7dc8b27-a0a3-4b3c-be6b-17abc38e3087
Machokoto, Michael
c7cbeeb7-34ba-48c9-aa3c-560eb24e97ec
Bassyouny, Hesham
b7dc8b27-a0a3-4b3c-be6b-17abc38e3087
Machokoto, Michael
c7cbeeb7-34ba-48c9-aa3c-560eb24e97ec

Bassyouny, Hesham and Machokoto, Michael (2023) Does negativity matter under the principle-based approach? Evidence from narrative reporting in the UK. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. (doi:10.1108/IJAIM-01-2023-0001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: this paper aims to investigate the association between negative tone in annual report narratives and future performance in the UK context. Under the principle-based approach in the UK, managers tend to bias the tone of narrative reports upward, as the reporting regime is more flexible than the rule-based approach in the USA. Consequently, any negative disclosure not mandated by regulators conveys credible information about a firm’s prospects.

Design/methodology/approach: this paper uses a sample of UK FTSE all-share non-financial companies from 2010 to 2019. The authors use the textual-analysis approach based on Loughran and McDonald (2011)’s wordlist (LM) to measure the negative tone in UK annual reports.

Findings: the results show a significant negative association between negative tone and future performance. Moreover, our further analyses suggest that only the negativity in the executive section of the annual disclosures correlates significantly with future performance. In summary, this study suggests that negativity does matter under the principle-based approach and can be used as an indicator of future performance

Originality/value: in contrast to the literature arguing that only positivity has the power to affect a firm’s outcomes under the principle-based approach, the authors provide new empirical evidence suggesting that negativity also matters within the UK context and can be used as an indicator for future performance. Also, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to identify which section of the annual report is more informative about a firm’s future performance.

Text
Accepted Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (112kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 November 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 November 2023
Keywords: Firm performance, Narrative disclosure, Negativity, Textual-analysis, United Kingdom

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 485740
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485740
ISSN: 1834-7649
PURE UUID: b410eda7-ab53-4d79-b013-02203edd03b0
ORCID for Hesham Bassyouny: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-3544

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Dec 2023 20:28
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Hesham Bassyouny ORCID iD
Author: Michael Machokoto

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×