Public and professional involvement in a systematic review investigating the impact of occupational therapy on the self-management of rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Introduction: public and health professional involvement (PHPI) is essential in healthcare research yet uncommonly integrated into systematic reviews. We incorporated and evaluated PHPI in a mixed methods review of occupational therapy for self-management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: public partners were living with or caring for someone with RA. Our steering group comprised two public, two professionals (one occupational therapist, one rheumatologist), and one reviewer who planned the review’s PHPI (August 2021). Involvement was evaluated from public and health professional (PHP) perspectives using a survey and workshops (August-October 2022) exploring reasons for involvement, challenges, and learning opportunities.

Results: alongside the steering group, 16 public and six professionals were involved throughout the review. Five public refined the search strategy, with three assisting in subsequent review activities. PHPs helped interpret findings during three public (n=12) and one professional workshop (n=4). Three occupational therapists and one public co-authored (ED) publications. In evaluation, PHPs felt valued and that their involvement was well-integrated. The researchers underestimated the time required for communicating and conducting PHPI in the review.

Conclusions: PHPI is worthwhile, feasible and can be integrated within a systematic review. PHP partners considered participation valuable; researchers must prioritise time to prepare and communicate PHPI activities.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for James Peter Gavin: orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-0502

ORCID for Vicky Fenerty: orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-5614

ORCID for Jo Adams: orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-7060

Catalogue record

Export record