Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the UK
Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the UK
Introduction: almost all patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in intensive care units (ICUs) require analgesia and sedation. The most widely used sedative drug is propofol, but there is uncertainty whether alpha2-agonists are superior. The alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B) trial aims to determine whether clonidine or dexmedetomidine (or both) are clinically and cost-effective in MV ICU patients compared with usual care.
Methods and analysis: adult ICU patients within 48 hours of starting MV, expected to require at least 24 hours further MV, are randomised in an open-label three arm trial to receive propofol (usual care) or clonidine or dexmedetomidine as primary sedative, plus analgesia according to local practice. Exclusions include patients with primary brain injury; postcardiac arrest; other neurological conditions; or bradycardia. Unless clinically contraindicated, sedation is titrated using weight-based dosing guidance to achieve a Richmond-Agitation-Sedation score of -2 or greater as early as considered safe by clinicians. The primary outcome is time to successful extubation. Secondary ICU outcomes include delirium and coma incidence/duration, sedation quality, predefined adverse events, mortality and ICU length of stay. Post-ICU outcomes include mortality, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress, cognitive function and health-related quality of life at 6-month follow-up. A process evaluation and health economic evaluation are embedded in the trial. The analytic framework uses a hierarchical approach to maximise efficiency and control type I error. Stage 1 tests whether each alpha2-agonist is superior to propofol. If either/both interventions are superior, stages 2 and 3 testing explores which alpha2-agonist is more effective. To detect a mean difference of 2 days in MV duration, we aim to recruit 1437 patients (479 per group) in 40-50 UK ICUs.
Ethics and dissemination: the Scotland A REC approved the trial (18/SS/0085). We use a surrogate decision-maker or deferred consent model consistent with UK law. Dissemination will be via publications, presentations and updated guidelines.
Walsh, Timothy Simon
755f19b7-901c-4078-8146-b3fd14ad79d0
Aitken, Leanne M.
6007b9b8-bf47-4c08-b4b0-cf5d6642374e
McKenzie, Cathrine A.
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c
10 December 2023
Walsh, Timothy Simon
755f19b7-901c-4078-8146-b3fd14ad79d0
Aitken, Leanne M.
6007b9b8-bf47-4c08-b4b0-cf5d6642374e
McKenzie, Cathrine A.
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c
Walsh, Timothy Simon, Aitken, Leanne M. and McKenzie, Cathrine A.
,
et al.
(2023)
Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the UK.
BMJ Open, 13 (12), [e078645].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078645).
Abstract
Introduction: almost all patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in intensive care units (ICUs) require analgesia and sedation. The most widely used sedative drug is propofol, but there is uncertainty whether alpha2-agonists are superior. The alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B) trial aims to determine whether clonidine or dexmedetomidine (or both) are clinically and cost-effective in MV ICU patients compared with usual care.
Methods and analysis: adult ICU patients within 48 hours of starting MV, expected to require at least 24 hours further MV, are randomised in an open-label three arm trial to receive propofol (usual care) or clonidine or dexmedetomidine as primary sedative, plus analgesia according to local practice. Exclusions include patients with primary brain injury; postcardiac arrest; other neurological conditions; or bradycardia. Unless clinically contraindicated, sedation is titrated using weight-based dosing guidance to achieve a Richmond-Agitation-Sedation score of -2 or greater as early as considered safe by clinicians. The primary outcome is time to successful extubation. Secondary ICU outcomes include delirium and coma incidence/duration, sedation quality, predefined adverse events, mortality and ICU length of stay. Post-ICU outcomes include mortality, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress, cognitive function and health-related quality of life at 6-month follow-up. A process evaluation and health economic evaluation are embedded in the trial. The analytic framework uses a hierarchical approach to maximise efficiency and control type I error. Stage 1 tests whether each alpha2-agonist is superior to propofol. If either/both interventions are superior, stages 2 and 3 testing explores which alpha2-agonist is more effective. To detect a mean difference of 2 days in MV duration, we aim to recruit 1437 patients (479 per group) in 40-50 UK ICUs.
Ethics and dissemination: the Scotland A REC approved the trial (18/SS/0085). We use a surrogate decision-maker or deferred consent model consistent with UK law. Dissemination will be via publications, presentations and updated guidelines.
Text
A2B-protocol-publication-R1-main-document---marked-copy -accepted version 20th Nov 2023
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
e078645.full
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 10 December 2023
Additional Information:
Funding Information: this work is supported by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (HTA 16/93/01). The NIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN) supports the trial.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 485893
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/485893
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 888f1a35-5c85-4988-b3f9-9957999a3509
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jan 2024 21:01
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Timothy Simon Walsh
Author:
Leanne M. Aitken
Author:
Cathrine A. McKenzie
Corporate Author: et al.
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics