The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Assessing injury risk in male and female Royal Navy recruits: does the Functional Movement Screen provide understanding to inform effective injury mitigation?

Assessing injury risk in male and female Royal Navy recruits: does the Functional Movement Screen provide understanding to inform effective injury mitigation?
Assessing injury risk in male and female Royal Navy recruits: does the Functional Movement Screen provide understanding to inform effective injury mitigation?
Introduction: musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) are common during military and other occupational physical training programmes, and employers have a duty of care to mitigate this injury risk. MSKIs account for a high number of working days lost during initial military training, contribute to training attrition and impact training costs. Poorer movement quality may be associated with increased MSKI risk.

Methods: the present study evaluated the relationship between the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) Score, as a measure of movement quality, and injury risk in Royal Navy (RN) recruits. A cohort of 957 recruits was assessed using the FMS prior to the 10-week phase I training programme. Injury occurrence, time, type and severity were recorded prospectively during the training period.

Results: total FMS Score was associated with injury risk (p≤0.001), where recruits scoring ≥13 were 2.6 times more likely to sustain an injury during training. However, FMS Score accounted for only 10% of the variance in injury risk (R2=0.1). Sex was the only additional variable to significantly affect the regression model. Mean FMS Scores for men (14.6±2.3) and women (14.4±2.4) were similar, but injury occurrence in women was 1.7 times greater than in men. Examining the influence of individual FMS movement tests on injury prediction did not improve the model, where those movements that significantly contributed to injury prediction only accounted for a small amount of the variance (R2=0.01).

Conclusion: there was a weak relationship between FMS and injury risk in RN recruits. Evidence is provided that FMS score alone would not be appropriate to use as an injury prediction tool in military recruits.
2633-3767
Gibbs, J.
72699367-4156-4dd1-b83d-38710f14a8d8
Power, C.N.T.
b9677c39-e0dd-4e7c-b82c-043d1f6daa9e
Böhning, D.
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Warner, M.
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Downie, S.
d5e11243-09e1-42c3-92a8-a2614afa0f76
Allsopp, A.
6f2d24ba-ca1f-43c4-9edc-896d19b414d1
Stokes, M.
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f
Fallowfield, J.L.
ba8f5afe-819a-4f8d-a7c5-3799c927c656
Gibbs, J.
72699367-4156-4dd1-b83d-38710f14a8d8
Power, C.N.T.
b9677c39-e0dd-4e7c-b82c-043d1f6daa9e
Böhning, D.
1df635d4-e3dc-44d0-b61d-5fd11f6434e1
Warner, M.
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Downie, S.
d5e11243-09e1-42c3-92a8-a2614afa0f76
Allsopp, A.
6f2d24ba-ca1f-43c4-9edc-896d19b414d1
Stokes, M.
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f
Fallowfield, J.L.
ba8f5afe-819a-4f8d-a7c5-3799c927c656

Gibbs, J., Power, C.N.T., Böhning, D., Warner, M., Downie, S., Allsopp, A., Stokes, M. and Fallowfield, J.L. (2023) Assessing injury risk in male and female Royal Navy recruits: does the Functional Movement Screen provide understanding to inform effective injury mitigation? BMJ Military Health, [e002416]. (doi:10.1136/military-2023-002416).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) are common during military and other occupational physical training programmes, and employers have a duty of care to mitigate this injury risk. MSKIs account for a high number of working days lost during initial military training, contribute to training attrition and impact training costs. Poorer movement quality may be associated with increased MSKI risk.

Methods: the present study evaluated the relationship between the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) Score, as a measure of movement quality, and injury risk in Royal Navy (RN) recruits. A cohort of 957 recruits was assessed using the FMS prior to the 10-week phase I training programme. Injury occurrence, time, type and severity were recorded prospectively during the training period.

Results: total FMS Score was associated with injury risk (p≤0.001), where recruits scoring ≥13 were 2.6 times more likely to sustain an injury during training. However, FMS Score accounted for only 10% of the variance in injury risk (R2=0.1). Sex was the only additional variable to significantly affect the regression model. Mean FMS Scores for men (14.6±2.3) and women (14.4±2.4) were similar, but injury occurrence in women was 1.7 times greater than in men. Examining the influence of individual FMS movement tests on injury prediction did not improve the model, where those movements that significantly contributed to injury prediction only accounted for a small amount of the variance (R2=0.01).

Conclusion: there was a weak relationship between FMS and injury risk in RN recruits. Evidence is provided that FMS score alone would not be appropriate to use as an injury prediction tool in military recruits.

Text
2023.10.31 - Assessing Injury Risk of RN Recruits - Editor copy - Main Document - Accepted Manuscript
Download (106kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 November 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 November 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 486532
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/486532
ISSN: 2633-3767
PURE UUID: b62daeea-dde1-4b1e-96ff-3a8c3fa7e154
ORCID for D. Böhning: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-7106
ORCID for M. Warner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-0561
ORCID for M. Stokes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-0890

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jan 2024 17:34
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Gibbs
Author: C.N.T. Power
Author: D. Böhning ORCID iD
Author: M. Warner ORCID iD
Author: S. Downie
Author: A. Allsopp
Author: M. Stokes ORCID iD
Author: J.L. Fallowfield

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×