Reclaiming political party research
Reclaiming political party research
In a 2021 Special Issue in European Political Science, Anika Gauja and Karina Kosiara-Pedersen review the sub-field of party politics research. In doing so, they argue party politics scholarship reflects the broader development of the political science discipline, illustrating the evolving relationship between politics researchers and the organisations they study. In this reply, we argue that the party politics sub-field reflects the wider discipline in another crucial respect—it continues to marginalise gender politics scholarship. We demonstrate that a gendered lens fundamentally transforms key questions in the field around what party politics scholars study, and how and why they conduct their research, with relevant consequences for whose work is included. In failing to engage with this scholarship, “mainstream” party politics scholars are (re)producing unequal power relations and hierarchies within the discipline, while also depriving themselves of the capacity to address fully key questions of representation, democracy, continuity and change.
274–291
Kenny, Meryl
6d981747-0488-4463-aa5a-1135ff3d71bb
Bjarnegard, Elin
1c78583a-243d-4159-805c-70bd13fa15e4
Lovenduski, Joni
7e876926-8d30-43a5-a5e0-43aa23bd47ec
Childs, Sarah
f72425a7-c7ff-45a2-9dd8-bcb725ed6d32
Evans, Elizabeth
f1b57f4f-f30d-4cec-bec0-eeddb228afd9
Verge, Tania
5f2f7067-a056-4c1c-b2e3-e2c88f1c2f35
11 February 2023
Kenny, Meryl
6d981747-0488-4463-aa5a-1135ff3d71bb
Bjarnegard, Elin
1c78583a-243d-4159-805c-70bd13fa15e4
Lovenduski, Joni
7e876926-8d30-43a5-a5e0-43aa23bd47ec
Childs, Sarah
f72425a7-c7ff-45a2-9dd8-bcb725ed6d32
Evans, Elizabeth
f1b57f4f-f30d-4cec-bec0-eeddb228afd9
Verge, Tania
5f2f7067-a056-4c1c-b2e3-e2c88f1c2f35
Kenny, Meryl, Bjarnegard, Elin, Lovenduski, Joni, Childs, Sarah, Evans, Elizabeth and Verge, Tania
(2023)
Reclaiming political party research.
European Political Science, 21, .
(doi:10.1057/s41304-022-00362-0).
Abstract
In a 2021 Special Issue in European Political Science, Anika Gauja and Karina Kosiara-Pedersen review the sub-field of party politics research. In doing so, they argue party politics scholarship reflects the broader development of the political science discipline, illustrating the evolving relationship between politics researchers and the organisations they study. In this reply, we argue that the party politics sub-field reflects the wider discipline in another crucial respect—it continues to marginalise gender politics scholarship. We demonstrate that a gendered lens fundamentally transforms key questions in the field around what party politics scholars study, and how and why they conduct their research, with relevant consequences for whose work is included. In failing to engage with this scholarship, “mainstream” party politics scholars are (re)producing unequal power relations and hierarchies within the discipline, while also depriving themselves of the capacity to address fully key questions of representation, democracy, continuity and change.
Text
Reclaiming Party Research
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 January 2022
Published date: 11 February 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 487660
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/487660
ISSN: 1680-4333
PURE UUID: 3c049b54-0759-4a72-b928-cc4e8607488c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Feb 2024 18:14
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 04:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Meryl Kenny
Author:
Elin Bjarnegard
Author:
Joni Lovenduski
Author:
Sarah Childs
Author:
Elizabeth Evans
Author:
Tania Verge
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics