eHealth Literacy and the Use of NHS 111 Online Urgent Care Service in England: Cross-Sectional Survey
eHealth Literacy and the Use of NHS 111 Online Urgent Care Service in England: Cross-Sectional Survey
Background: Many health care systems have used digital technologies to support care delivery, a trend amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. “Digital first” may exacerbate health inequalities due to variations in eHealth literacy. The relationship between eHealth literacy and web-based urgent care service use is unknown. Objective: This study aims to measure the association between eHealth literacy and the use of NHS (National Health Service) 111 online urgent care service. Methods: A cross-sectional sequential convenience sample survey was conducted with 2754 adults (October 2020-July 2021) from primary, urgent, or emergency care; third sector organizations; and the NHS 111 online website. The survey included the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), questions about use, preferences for using NHS 111 online, and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Across almost all dimensions of the eHLQ, NHS 111 online users had higher mean digital literacy scores than nonusers (P<.001). Four eHLQ dimensions were significant predictors of use, and the most highly significant dimensions were eHLQ1 (using technology to process health information) and eHLQ3 (ability to actively engage with digital services), with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.86 (95% CI 1.46-2.38) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.22-1.88), respectively. Respondents reporting a long-term health condition had lower eHLQ scores. People younger than 25 years (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.87-5.62) and those with formal qualifications (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) were more likely to use NHS 111 online. Users and nonusers were likely to use NHS 111 online for a range of symptoms, including chest pain symptoms (n=1743, 70.4%) or for illness in children (n=1117, 79%). The users of NHS 111 online were more likely to have also used other health services, particularly the 111 telephone service (χ
1
2=138.57; P<.001). Conclusions: These differences in eHealth literacy scores amplify perennial concerns about digital exclusion and access to care for those impacted by intersecting forms of disadvantage, including long-term illness. Although many appear willing to use NHS 111 online for a range of health scenarios, indicating broad acceptability, not all are able or likely to do this. Despite a policy ambition for NHS 111 online to substitute for other services, it appears to be used alongside other urgent care services and thus may not reduce demand.
COVID-19, access, access to health care, cross-sectional, digital health, digital literacy, eHealth, eHealth literacy, emergency, health care system, health literacy, urgent, urgent care
e50376
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Prichard, Jane
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
MacLellan, Jennifer
147421a9-975e-49bb-bfde-8e7e4714744b
Pope, Catherine
dd92b307-b738-4914-8d81-2e0a8ccd146b
4 June 2024
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Prichard, Jane
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
MacLellan, Jennifer
147421a9-975e-49bb-bfde-8e7e4714744b
Pope, Catherine
dd92b307-b738-4914-8d81-2e0a8ccd146b
Turnbull, Joanne, Prichard, Jane, MacLellan, Jennifer and Pope, Catherine
(2024)
eHealth Literacy and the Use of NHS 111 Online Urgent Care Service in England: Cross-Sectional Survey.
Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, , [e50376].
(doi:10.2196/50376).
Abstract
Background: Many health care systems have used digital technologies to support care delivery, a trend amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. “Digital first” may exacerbate health inequalities due to variations in eHealth literacy. The relationship between eHealth literacy and web-based urgent care service use is unknown. Objective: This study aims to measure the association between eHealth literacy and the use of NHS (National Health Service) 111 online urgent care service. Methods: A cross-sectional sequential convenience sample survey was conducted with 2754 adults (October 2020-July 2021) from primary, urgent, or emergency care; third sector organizations; and the NHS 111 online website. The survey included the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), questions about use, preferences for using NHS 111 online, and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Across almost all dimensions of the eHLQ, NHS 111 online users had higher mean digital literacy scores than nonusers (P<.001). Four eHLQ dimensions were significant predictors of use, and the most highly significant dimensions were eHLQ1 (using technology to process health information) and eHLQ3 (ability to actively engage with digital services), with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.86 (95% CI 1.46-2.38) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.22-1.88), respectively. Respondents reporting a long-term health condition had lower eHLQ scores. People younger than 25 years (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.87-5.62) and those with formal qualifications (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) were more likely to use NHS 111 online. Users and nonusers were likely to use NHS 111 online for a range of symptoms, including chest pain symptoms (n=1743, 70.4%) or for illness in children (n=1117, 79%). The users of NHS 111 online were more likely to have also used other health services, particularly the 111 telephone service (χ
1
2=138.57; P<.001). Conclusions: These differences in eHealth literacy scores amplify perennial concerns about digital exclusion and access to care for those impacted by intersecting forms of disadvantage, including long-term illness. Although many appear willing to use NHS 111 online for a range of health scenarios, indicating broad acceptability, not all are able or likely to do this. Despite a policy ambition for NHS 111 online to substitute for other services, it appears to be used alongside other urgent care services and thus may not reduce demand.
Text
eHealth literacy and the use of the NHS 111 online urgent care service in England: Cross-Sectional Survey
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
jmir-2024-1-e50376
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 April 2024
Published date: 4 June 2024
Additional Information:
©Joanne Turnbull, Jane Prichard, Jennifer MacLellan, Catherine Pope. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 04.06.2024.
Keywords:
COVID-19, access, access to health care, cross-sectional, digital health, digital literacy, eHealth, eHealth literacy, emergency, health care system, health literacy, urgent, urgent care
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 489846
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489846
ISSN: 1438-8871
PURE UUID: 149e2ab8-5858-4e82-a1d2-f91928e54418
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 May 2024 16:35
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 01:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jennifer MacLellan
Author:
Catherine Pope
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics