The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

eHealth literacy and the use of NHS111 online urgent care service in England: a cross-sectional survey

eHealth literacy and the use of NHS111 online urgent care service in England: a cross-sectional survey
eHealth literacy and the use of NHS111 online urgent care service in England: a cross-sectional survey
Background: many healthcare systems have employed digital technologies to support care delivery, a trend amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. 'Digital first' may exacerbate health inequalities due to variation in eHealth literacy. The relationship between eHealth literacy in relation to online urgent care service use is unknown.

Objective: We measured the association of eHealth literacy with use of the NHS 111 online urgent care service.

Methods: A cross-sectional sequential convenience sample survey of 2754 adults (October 2020 - July 2021), from primary, urgent/emergency care, third sector organisations and the NHS 111 online website. The survey included the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), questions about use and preferences for using 111 online, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: across almost all dimensions of the eHLQ, NHS 111 online users had higher mean digital literacy scores than non-users (P<0.001). Four eHLQ dimensions were significant predictors of use, most highly significant for eHLQ1 (Using technology to process health information) and eHLQ3 (Ability to actively engage with digital services) - odds ratios (95% CI) of 1.86 (1.46 to 2.38) and 1.51 (1.22 to 1.88) respectively. Respondents reporting a long-term health condition (LTHC) had lower eHLQ scores. People under 25 (OR (95% CI) 3.24 (1.87 to 5.62)), and those with formal qualifications (0.74 (0.55 to 0.99) were more likely to use 111 online. Users and non-users were likely to use NHS 111 online for a range of symptoms, including chest pain symptoms (70.4%) or for illness in children (70.0%). Users of NHS 111 online were more likely to have also used other health services, particularly the 111 telephone service (X2=138.57; P <0.001).

Conclusions: these differences in eHealth literacy scores amplify perennial concerns about digital exclusion and access to care for those impacted by intersecting forms of disadvantage, including long term illness. Although many appear willing to use NHS 111 online for a range of health scenarios, indicating broad acceptability, not all are able or likely to do this. Despite a policy ambition for 111 online to substitute for other services, it appears to be used alongside other urgent care services, and thus may not reduce demand.
1438-8871
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Prichard, Jane
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
MacLellan, Jennifer
147421a9-975e-49bb-bfde-8e7e4714744b
Pope, Catherine
dd92b307-b738-4914-8d81-2e0a8ccd146b
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Prichard, Jane
64ba5e39-0b0f-4529-877f-aa6ecc7e7e2e
MacLellan, Jennifer
147421a9-975e-49bb-bfde-8e7e4714744b
Pope, Catherine
dd92b307-b738-4914-8d81-2e0a8ccd146b

Turnbull, Joanne, Prichard, Jane, MacLellan, Jennifer and Pope, Catherine (2024) eHealth literacy and the use of NHS111 online urgent care service in England: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: many healthcare systems have employed digital technologies to support care delivery, a trend amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. 'Digital first' may exacerbate health inequalities due to variation in eHealth literacy. The relationship between eHealth literacy in relation to online urgent care service use is unknown.

Objective: We measured the association of eHealth literacy with use of the NHS 111 online urgent care service.

Methods: A cross-sectional sequential convenience sample survey of 2754 adults (October 2020 - July 2021), from primary, urgent/emergency care, third sector organisations and the NHS 111 online website. The survey included the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), questions about use and preferences for using 111 online, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: across almost all dimensions of the eHLQ, NHS 111 online users had higher mean digital literacy scores than non-users (P<0.001). Four eHLQ dimensions were significant predictors of use, most highly significant for eHLQ1 (Using technology to process health information) and eHLQ3 (Ability to actively engage with digital services) - odds ratios (95% CI) of 1.86 (1.46 to 2.38) and 1.51 (1.22 to 1.88) respectively. Respondents reporting a long-term health condition (LTHC) had lower eHLQ scores. People under 25 (OR (95% CI) 3.24 (1.87 to 5.62)), and those with formal qualifications (0.74 (0.55 to 0.99) were more likely to use 111 online. Users and non-users were likely to use NHS 111 online for a range of symptoms, including chest pain symptoms (70.4%) or for illness in children (70.0%). Users of NHS 111 online were more likely to have also used other health services, particularly the 111 telephone service (X2=138.57; P <0.001).

Conclusions: these differences in eHealth literacy scores amplify perennial concerns about digital exclusion and access to care for those impacted by intersecting forms of disadvantage, including long term illness. Although many appear willing to use NHS 111 online for a range of health scenarios, indicating broad acceptability, not all are able or likely to do this. Despite a policy ambition for 111 online to substitute for other services, it appears to be used alongside other urgent care services, and thus may not reduce demand.

Text
ehlq and NHS 111 online - JMIR final revised manuscript - pre-print copy Apr 2024 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 June 2024.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 April 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489846
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489846
ISSN: 1438-8871
PURE UUID: 149e2ab8-5858-4e82-a1d2-f91928e54418
ORCID for Joanne Turnbull: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-4438
ORCID for Jane Prichard: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-2244

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 May 2024 16:35
Last modified: 04 May 2024 01:35

Export record

Contributors

Author: Joanne Turnbull ORCID iD
Author: Jane Prichard ORCID iD
Author: Jennifer MacLellan
Author: Catherine Pope

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×