The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An application of artificial intelligence to a linear inverse problem in dipolar spectroscopy

An application of artificial intelligence to a linear inverse problem in dipolar spectroscopy
An application of artificial intelligence to a linear inverse problem in dipolar spectroscopy
Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) Spectroscopy plays a pivotal role in analysing molecular distances at the nanoscale, a crucial factor in understanding the structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules. However, the challenge lies in extracting distance distributions from DEER data due to the inherently ill-conditioned nature of the inverse problem. Traditional solutions, such as regularisation, introduce bias through operator selection based on prior assumptions like smoothness.

Recent applications of neural networks in this field provide a promising, data-driven alternative. Nevertheless, concerns regarding the perceived ’black box’ nature of these networks raise questions about their trustworthiness. Trust, though often nebulous, can be clarified by comparing it to the trust we place in human experts. Human experts are considered trustworthy when:



1. They possess recognised expertise, demonstrated through a history of high-quality publications.

2. They accurately assess and communicate their confidence level in their judgements, avoiding unwarranted overconfidence.

3. They readily admit when a problem or question falls outside their area of expertise, avoiding speculation in unfamiliar domains.

4. They effectively articulate their reasoning and thought process, ensuring transparency in their decision-making.

Translating these criteria to neural networks yields explicit expectations:

1. Demonstrated high predictive accuracy, validated through rigorous testing and consistent performance.

2. The ability to quantify uncertainty in predictions.

3. The capability to detect when a query falls outside its training distribution.

4. An explainable decision-making process.

This thesis delves into enhancing predictive accuracy in DEER spectroscopy by addressing the “vanishing gradient problem” in neural networks. It explores uncertainty quantification through ensemble techniques and out-of-distribution detection via model fitting. Lastly, it introduces “descrambling”, an innovative post-hoc explainability method based on equivalence transforms, aimed at elucidating the internal processes of the neural network.
University of Southampton
Keeley, Jake
d6a30ebd-36e7-4064-90c0-0192d9c9e5f3
Keeley, Jake
d6a30ebd-36e7-4064-90c0-0192d9c9e5f3
Kuprov, Ilya
bb07f28a-5038-4524-8146-e3fc8344c065

Keeley, Jake (2024) An application of artificial intelligence to a linear inverse problem in dipolar spectroscopy. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 126pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) Spectroscopy plays a pivotal role in analysing molecular distances at the nanoscale, a crucial factor in understanding the structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules. However, the challenge lies in extracting distance distributions from DEER data due to the inherently ill-conditioned nature of the inverse problem. Traditional solutions, such as regularisation, introduce bias through operator selection based on prior assumptions like smoothness.

Recent applications of neural networks in this field provide a promising, data-driven alternative. Nevertheless, concerns regarding the perceived ’black box’ nature of these networks raise questions about their trustworthiness. Trust, though often nebulous, can be clarified by comparing it to the trust we place in human experts. Human experts are considered trustworthy when:



1. They possess recognised expertise, demonstrated through a history of high-quality publications.

2. They accurately assess and communicate their confidence level in their judgements, avoiding unwarranted overconfidence.

3. They readily admit when a problem or question falls outside their area of expertise, avoiding speculation in unfamiliar domains.

4. They effectively articulate their reasoning and thought process, ensuring transparency in their decision-making.

Translating these criteria to neural networks yields explicit expectations:

1. Demonstrated high predictive accuracy, validated through rigorous testing and consistent performance.

2. The ability to quantify uncertainty in predictions.

3. The capability to detect when a query falls outside its training distribution.

4. An explainable decision-making process.

This thesis delves into enhancing predictive accuracy in DEER spectroscopy by addressing the “vanishing gradient problem” in neural networks. It explores uncertainty quantification through ensemble techniques and out-of-distribution detection via model fitting. Lastly, it introduces “descrambling”, an innovative post-hoc explainability method based on equivalence transforms, aimed at elucidating the internal processes of the neural network.

Text
newThesis_PDFA3b - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (3MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Jake-Keeley
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: June 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490747
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490747
PURE UUID: 4b3653be-d059-4c8f-b3a7-d9f9fc3d7245
ORCID for Ilya Kuprov: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-2682

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jun 2024 20:32
Last modified: 17 Aug 2024 01:44

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jake Keeley
Thesis advisor: Ilya Kuprov ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×