Screening for psychosis risk in primary mental health care services – implementation, prevalence and recovery trajectories
Screening for psychosis risk in primary mental health care services – implementation, prevalence and recovery trajectories
Objectives: early interventions improve outcomes for people at high risk of psychosis and are likely to be cost saving. This group tends to seek help for emotional problems – depression and anxiety – via primary care services, where early detection methods are poor. We sought to determine prevalence rates of high risk for psychosis in UK primary care mental health services and clinical outcomes following routinely delivered psychological therapies.
Methods: we used a brief screen designed for settings with low base rates and significant time constraints to determine prevalence of high risk for psychosis in UK ‘Talking Therapies’ services. We examined socio-demographic characteristics, presenting problems and recovery trajectories for this group, compared with people not at risk of psychosis.
Results: a 2-item screen selected for specificity yielded a prevalence rate of 3% in primary care mental health services. People at elevated risk of psychosis were younger and more likely to report at least one long-term physical condition. This group presented with higher levels of depression, anxiety and trauma symptoms at assessment and were less likely to have recovered at the end of treatment, compared to people not at risk.
Conclusions: very brief screening tools can be implemented in busy health care settings. The 3% of referrals to UK primary care psychological therapies services at elevated risk of psychosis typically present with more severe symptoms and greater levels of comorbidity and may require augmented interventions to recover fully.
At-Risk Mental State (ARMS), clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), early detection, improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT), outcomes, primary care, psychotic experience, talking therapies
589-602
Newman-Taylor, Katherine
e090b9da-6ede-45d5-8a56-2e86c2dafef7
Maguire, Tess
f720bf11-2227-470f-b9bf-b323a59e176c
Smart, Tanya
bb2e8da4-4124-4158-adbc-0bdc400f320e
Bayford, Emma
35938be2-e309-4091-a3c5-9eda2f9f0afd
Gosden, Emily
471ec92b-ce94-432d-85bb-89fb1f7f6826
Addyman, Grace
5e2bbf35-f0cc-4ae3-a7a2-62ea6b17927b
Bullard, Pete
2f863e16-2eb0-44b6-9981-bf5b059ca156
Simmons-Dauvin, Miriam
d84f28ef-6e66-4371-8ac4-c4d115f0142f
Margoum, Morad
7f95d0b1-be65-4868-bd9e-f758272b32fc
Smart, Ben
466664db-1580-44d3-bb56-c7064e1fdb6c
Graves, Elizabeth
d37e03c2-4e0c-4223-9865-9cf112e91d4b
1 July 2024
Newman-Taylor, Katherine
e090b9da-6ede-45d5-8a56-2e86c2dafef7
Maguire, Tess
f720bf11-2227-470f-b9bf-b323a59e176c
Smart, Tanya
bb2e8da4-4124-4158-adbc-0bdc400f320e
Bayford, Emma
35938be2-e309-4091-a3c5-9eda2f9f0afd
Gosden, Emily
471ec92b-ce94-432d-85bb-89fb1f7f6826
Addyman, Grace
5e2bbf35-f0cc-4ae3-a7a2-62ea6b17927b
Bullard, Pete
2f863e16-2eb0-44b6-9981-bf5b059ca156
Simmons-Dauvin, Miriam
d84f28ef-6e66-4371-8ac4-c4d115f0142f
Margoum, Morad
7f95d0b1-be65-4868-bd9e-f758272b32fc
Smart, Ben
466664db-1580-44d3-bb56-c7064e1fdb6c
Graves, Elizabeth
d37e03c2-4e0c-4223-9865-9cf112e91d4b
Newman-Taylor, Katherine, Maguire, Tess, Smart, Tanya, Bayford, Emma, Gosden, Emily, Addyman, Grace, Bullard, Pete, Simmons-Dauvin, Miriam, Margoum, Morad, Smart, Ben and Graves, Elizabeth
(2024)
Screening for psychosis risk in primary mental health care services – implementation, prevalence and recovery trajectories.
British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63 (4), .
(doi:10.1111/bjc.12490).
Abstract
Objectives: early interventions improve outcomes for people at high risk of psychosis and are likely to be cost saving. This group tends to seek help for emotional problems – depression and anxiety – via primary care services, where early detection methods are poor. We sought to determine prevalence rates of high risk for psychosis in UK primary care mental health services and clinical outcomes following routinely delivered psychological therapies.
Methods: we used a brief screen designed for settings with low base rates and significant time constraints to determine prevalence of high risk for psychosis in UK ‘Talking Therapies’ services. We examined socio-demographic characteristics, presenting problems and recovery trajectories for this group, compared with people not at risk of psychosis.
Results: a 2-item screen selected for specificity yielded a prevalence rate of 3% in primary care mental health services. People at elevated risk of psychosis were younger and more likely to report at least one long-term physical condition. This group presented with higher levels of depression, anxiety and trauma symptoms at assessment and were less likely to have recovered at the end of treatment, compared to people not at risk.
Conclusions: very brief screening tools can be implemented in busy health care settings. The 3% of referrals to UK primary care psychological therapies services at elevated risk of psychosis typically present with more severe symptoms and greater levels of comorbidity and may require augmented interventions to recover fully.
Text
CHR-P in primary care - accepted ms
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
British J Clinic Psychol - 2024 - Newman‐Taylor - Screening for psychosis risk in primary mental health care services
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 June 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 July 2024
Published date: 1 July 2024
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Keywords:
At-Risk Mental State (ARMS), clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), early detection, improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT), outcomes, primary care, psychotic experience, talking therapies
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 492014
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492014
ISSN: 0144-6657
PURE UUID: 4073a690-09fe-4dc5-8a0c-9b4fef5ce3e0
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jul 2024 16:43
Last modified: 24 Oct 2024 01:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tanya Smart
Author:
Emma Bayford
Author:
Emily Gosden
Author:
Grace Addyman
Author:
Pete Bullard
Author:
Miriam Simmons-Dauvin
Author:
Morad Margoum
Author:
Ben Smart
Author:
Elizabeth Graves
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics