The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An open label, phase IV randomised controlled trial of two schedules of a four-component meningococcal B vaccine in UK preterm infants

An open label, phase IV randomised controlled trial of two schedules of a four-component meningococcal B vaccine in UK preterm infants
An open label, phase IV randomised controlled trial of two schedules of a four-component meningococcal B vaccine in UK preterm infants
Objective: to compare immunological responses of preterm infants to a four-component meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero) following a 2+1 vs a 3+1 schedule, and to describe reactogenicity of routine vaccines.

Design: an open-label, phase IV randomised study conducted across six UK sites.

Setting: neonatal units, postnatal wards, community recruitment following discharge.

Participants: 129 preterm infants born at a gestation of <35 weeks (64 in group 1 (2+1), 65 in group 2 (3+1)) were included in the analysis. Analysis was completed for postprimary samples from 125 participants (59 in group 1, 66 in group 2) and for postbooster samples from 118 participants (59 in both groups).

Interventions: infants randomised to 4CMenB according to a 2+1 or a 3+1 schedule, alongside routine vaccines.

Main outcome measures: serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assays performed at 5, 12 and 13 months of age: geometric mean titres (GMTs) and proportions of infants achieving titres ≥4 compared between groups.

Results: there were no significant differences in SBA GMTs between infants receiving a 2+1 compared with a 3+1 schedule following primary or booster vaccination, but a significantly higher proportion of infants had an SBA titre ≥4 against strain NZ98/254 (porin A) at 1 month after primary vaccination using a 3+1 compared with a 2+1 schedule (3+1: 87% (95% CI 76 to 94%), 2+1: 70% (95% CI 56 to 81%), p=0.03).

At 12 weeks of age those in the 3+1 group, who received a dose of 4CMenB, had significantly more episodes of fever >38.0°C than those in the 2+1 group who did not (group 2+1: 2% (n=1); 3+1: 14% (n=9); p=0.02).

Conclusions: both schedules were immunogenic in preterm infants, although a lower response against strain NZ98/254 was seen in the 2+1 schedule; ongoing disease surveillance is important in understanding the clinical significance of this difference.

Trial registration number NCT03125616.
0003-9888
Calvert, Anna
81e418f7-2180-46d4-af9e-61e79e703d65
Andrews, Nick
7d63cec1-f343-4e37-83b3-8f80e4022ed4
Barlow, Sheula
e496a1c5-09a3-4acb-aa6c-3f8dbb27e1b1
Jones, Christine E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426
et al.
Calvert, Anna
81e418f7-2180-46d4-af9e-61e79e703d65
Andrews, Nick
7d63cec1-f343-4e37-83b3-8f80e4022ed4
Barlow, Sheula
e496a1c5-09a3-4acb-aa6c-3f8dbb27e1b1
Jones, Christine E.
48229079-8b58-4dcb-8374-d9481fe7b426

Calvert, Anna, Andrews, Nick and Barlow, Sheula , et al. (2024) An open label, phase IV randomised controlled trial of two schedules of a four-component meningococcal B vaccine in UK preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. (doi:10.1136/archdischild-2024-327040).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to compare immunological responses of preterm infants to a four-component meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero) following a 2+1 vs a 3+1 schedule, and to describe reactogenicity of routine vaccines.

Design: an open-label, phase IV randomised study conducted across six UK sites.

Setting: neonatal units, postnatal wards, community recruitment following discharge.

Participants: 129 preterm infants born at a gestation of <35 weeks (64 in group 1 (2+1), 65 in group 2 (3+1)) were included in the analysis. Analysis was completed for postprimary samples from 125 participants (59 in group 1, 66 in group 2) and for postbooster samples from 118 participants (59 in both groups).

Interventions: infants randomised to 4CMenB according to a 2+1 or a 3+1 schedule, alongside routine vaccines.

Main outcome measures: serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assays performed at 5, 12 and 13 months of age: geometric mean titres (GMTs) and proportions of infants achieving titres ≥4 compared between groups.

Results: there were no significant differences in SBA GMTs between infants receiving a 2+1 compared with a 3+1 schedule following primary or booster vaccination, but a significantly higher proportion of infants had an SBA titre ≥4 against strain NZ98/254 (porin A) at 1 month after primary vaccination using a 3+1 compared with a 2+1 schedule (3+1: 87% (95% CI 76 to 94%), 2+1: 70% (95% CI 56 to 81%), p=0.03).

At 12 weeks of age those in the 3+1 group, who received a dose of 4CMenB, had significantly more episodes of fever >38.0°C than those in the 2+1 group who did not (group 2+1: 2% (n=1); 3+1: 14% (n=9); p=0.02).

Conclusions: both schedules were immunogenic in preterm infants, although a lower response against strain NZ98/254 was seen in the 2+1 schedule; ongoing disease surveillance is important in understanding the clinical significance of this difference.

Trial registration number NCT03125616.

Text
archdischild-2024-327040.full - Version of Record
Download (1MB)
Text
BEAR-Men-B-post-review_May_2024_clean_images removed - Version of Record
Download (50kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 June 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 July 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492382
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492382
ISSN: 0003-9888
PURE UUID: ab4564c1-456d-44da-bb22-68c734ed6ce5
ORCID for Christine E. Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-2368

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jul 2024 16:49
Last modified: 26 Jul 2024 01:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anna Calvert
Author: Nick Andrews
Author: Sheula Barlow
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×