The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The role of collective behaviour in fish response to visual cues

The role of collective behaviour in fish response to visual cues
The role of collective behaviour in fish response to visual cues
This study investigated the influence of group size (individual, groups of five, and 20) on the response of common minnow to visual cues created by vertical black and white stripes over time. The stripes were displayed on a monitor either at one end of an experimental tank, while the other was uniform white, or both ends simultaneously. Reponses were compared with a control (stripes absent). Visual cues were pseudo-randomly presented every 15-minutes over six-hours. Three predictions were made: first, due to more efficient flow of information, larger groups would respond more rapidly (Rate of response) to the visual cues. Second, assuming visual cues provide a proxy for structure and larger groups experience greater benefits of group membership due to reduced predatory risk, there will be stronger association (Strength of association and Final association) with stripes for individuals and smaller groups compared with larger groups. Consequently, the association with visual cues exhibited by larger groups would diminish over time compared to smaller, more risk averse groups. As expected, larger groups exhibited a faster Rate of response to visual cues, and individual fish a greater Strength of association compared with the largest group size. Final association, however, was more common for larger groups compared to both smaller groups and individuals. Contrary to the final prediction, responses to visual cues did not decrease over time for any group size, suggesting innate behaviour or an experimental duration insufficient to observe habituation.
Group decision making, minnow, refuge, shoal, visual ecology, environmental stimuli
0376-6357
Miles, James
993242b0-5784-4d76-825a-b757dffd9ac1
Vowles, Andrew S.
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Kemp, Paul S.
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7
Miles, James
993242b0-5784-4d76-825a-b757dffd9ac1
Vowles, Andrew S.
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Kemp, Paul S.
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7

Miles, James, Vowles, Andrew S. and Kemp, Paul S. (2024) The role of collective behaviour in fish response to visual cues. Behavioural Processes, 220, [105079]. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105079).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of group size (individual, groups of five, and 20) on the response of common minnow to visual cues created by vertical black and white stripes over time. The stripes were displayed on a monitor either at one end of an experimental tank, while the other was uniform white, or both ends simultaneously. Reponses were compared with a control (stripes absent). Visual cues were pseudo-randomly presented every 15-minutes over six-hours. Three predictions were made: first, due to more efficient flow of information, larger groups would respond more rapidly (Rate of response) to the visual cues. Second, assuming visual cues provide a proxy for structure and larger groups experience greater benefits of group membership due to reduced predatory risk, there will be stronger association (Strength of association and Final association) with stripes for individuals and smaller groups compared with larger groups. Consequently, the association with visual cues exhibited by larger groups would diminish over time compared to smaller, more risk averse groups. As expected, larger groups exhibited a faster Rate of response to visual cues, and individual fish a greater Strength of association compared with the largest group size. Final association, however, was more common for larger groups compared to both smaller groups and individuals. Contrary to the final prediction, responses to visual cues did not decrease over time for any group size, suggesting innate behaviour or an experimental duration insufficient to observe habituation.

Text
Miles et al. Behavioural Processes_acceptedMS - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (398kB)
Text
1-s2.0-S0376635724000949-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 July 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 July 2024
Published date: 25 July 2024
Keywords: Group decision making, minnow, refuge, shoal, visual ecology, environmental stimuli

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492693
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492693
ISSN: 0376-6357
PURE UUID: 12226b0f-df58-4364-be10-58140cbbc7cd
ORCID for James Miles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-6343
ORCID for Andrew S. Vowles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-5938
ORCID for Paul S. Kemp: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-0589

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Aug 2024 16:37
Last modified: 13 Aug 2024 01:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×