The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Beginning mathematics teachers’ values and beliefs about pedagogy during a time of policy flux

Beginning mathematics teachers’ values and beliefs about pedagogy during a time of policy flux
Beginning mathematics teachers’ values and beliefs about pedagogy during a time of policy flux
This study interrogates how beginning secondary mathematics teachers align their beliefs with their practice when they justify their pedagogical choices in the context of recent English mathematics education policy which is strongly influenced by approaches to mathematics teaching in Shanghai and Singapore currently referred to as ‘mastery’ approaches. It seeks to understand beginning teachers’ perceptions and understandings of these approaches and the extent to which they recognise aspects of ‘mastery’ in practice. In set-ting the context, pre-service teachers’ beliefs were surveyed and found to be congruent with constructivist approaches to learning. We then draw on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews secondary mathematics teachers in their first year post-qualification. The interviews were designed to interrogate and capture understanding of the features of mastery within their own classrooms. By using vignettes to capture participants’ beliefs, our aim was to present a ‘more nuanced understanding of the phenomena’ (Skilling and Stylianides in Int J Res Method Educ 43(5):541–556, 2019, 10.1080/1743727x.2019.1704243).The analytical framework developed draws on Guskey’s (In: Wright J (ed) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioural sciences, 2015, vol 14, 2nd edn, Elsevier, pp752–759) interpretation of Bloom’s theory of mastery learning together with features of mastery learning in mathematics articulated by Drury (How to teach mathematics for mas-tery, 2018, Oxford University Press) and Boylan et al. (Edu Sci 8(4):202, 2018, 10.3390/educsci8040202). This posed a research design challenge given the variation in interpretation of mastery learning as it is understood in practice. The data exposes differences in the interpretation of mastery approaches in the settings where they learn to teach, as well as the tensions that arise between beginning teachers’ beliefs, practice, professional knowledge and agency in their developing classroom roles.
mastery, vignettes, beliefs, pedagogy, Pedagogy, Beliefs, Mastery, Vignettes
1386-4416
Hyde, Rosalyn
a8c0ae26-bcbf-4ce4-96cc-16fe07447f8e
Archer, Rosa
e4ff24ef-1de4-442c-b268-4c117caaa261
Bamber, Sally
4ba41db4-9a88-4a29-9f58-b9b9456a320c
Hyde, Rosalyn
a8c0ae26-bcbf-4ce4-96cc-16fe07447f8e
Archer, Rosa
e4ff24ef-1de4-442c-b268-4c117caaa261
Bamber, Sally
4ba41db4-9a88-4a29-9f58-b9b9456a320c

Hyde, Rosalyn, Archer, Rosa and Bamber, Sally (2024) Beginning mathematics teachers’ values and beliefs about pedagogy during a time of policy flux. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. (doi:10.1007/s10857-024-09647-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This study interrogates how beginning secondary mathematics teachers align their beliefs with their practice when they justify their pedagogical choices in the context of recent English mathematics education policy which is strongly influenced by approaches to mathematics teaching in Shanghai and Singapore currently referred to as ‘mastery’ approaches. It seeks to understand beginning teachers’ perceptions and understandings of these approaches and the extent to which they recognise aspects of ‘mastery’ in practice. In set-ting the context, pre-service teachers’ beliefs were surveyed and found to be congruent with constructivist approaches to learning. We then draw on qualitative data from semi-structured interviews secondary mathematics teachers in their first year post-qualification. The interviews were designed to interrogate and capture understanding of the features of mastery within their own classrooms. By using vignettes to capture participants’ beliefs, our aim was to present a ‘more nuanced understanding of the phenomena’ (Skilling and Stylianides in Int J Res Method Educ 43(5):541–556, 2019, 10.1080/1743727x.2019.1704243).The analytical framework developed draws on Guskey’s (In: Wright J (ed) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioural sciences, 2015, vol 14, 2nd edn, Elsevier, pp752–759) interpretation of Bloom’s theory of mastery learning together with features of mastery learning in mathematics articulated by Drury (How to teach mathematics for mas-tery, 2018, Oxford University Press) and Boylan et al. (Edu Sci 8(4):202, 2018, 10.3390/educsci8040202). This posed a research design challenge given the variation in interpretation of mastery learning as it is understood in practice. The data exposes differences in the interpretation of mastery approaches in the settings where they learn to teach, as well as the tensions that arise between beginning teachers’ beliefs, practice, professional knowledge and agency in their developing classroom roles.

Text
Hyde_et_al-2024-Journal_of_Mathematics_Teacher_Education - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (721kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 June 2024
Published date: 3 July 2024
Keywords: mastery, vignettes, beliefs, pedagogy, Pedagogy, Beliefs, Mastery, Vignettes

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 492758
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/492758
ISSN: 1386-4416
PURE UUID: 3884fac6-bb81-40b9-9dcf-db277fa21496
ORCID for Rosalyn Hyde: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-2983

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Aug 2024 16:55
Last modified: 14 Aug 2024 01:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rosalyn Hyde ORCID iD
Author: Rosa Archer
Author: Sally Bamber

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×