The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Gender bias in assessing narcissistic personality: exploring the utility of the ICD-11 dimensional model

Gender bias in assessing narcissistic personality: exploring the utility of the ICD-11 dimensional model
Gender bias in assessing narcissistic personality: exploring the utility of the ICD-11 dimensional model
Narcissistic Personality Disorder as captured in categorical diagnostic systems (e.g., DSM-5) emphasises grandiose features more associated with masculine norms, and under-emphasises vulnerable features more associated with femininity. This poses significant implications in diagnostic outcome and clinical treatment in women with narcissistic preoccupations. Research finds that clinicians using the DSM-5 categorical system tend to diagnose vulnerable narcissism in women as other ‘feminised’ personality disorders (e.g., borderline), but no research has explored gender differences in narcissism using the new ICD-11 dimensional framework for personality disorders. This study investigated the clinical utility of the ICD-11 approach in capturing gender differences in narcissistic presentations. Adopting an online vignette-based study, mental health clinicians (N = 157; 71.3% female) completed ratings of ICD-11 personality disorder severity and trait domains for two cases reflecting ‘grandiose’ and ‘vulnerable’ narcissism in hypothetical male or female patients. Results showed that ratings of core impairments in personality functioning and overall severity were consistent irrespective of patient or clinician gender, contrasting prior research using categorical models. While some differences were observed in trait domain (e.g., negative affectivity) between patient gender, these results suggest the clinical utility of the ICD-11 model as emphasising elements of personality functioning in the process of assessment and diagnosis, therefore potentially being less susceptible to influences of gender stereotype in aiding clinical conceptualisation.
female narcissism, pathological narcissism, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, gender bias, diagnosis
0144-6657
Hart, Claire
e3db9c72-f493-439c-a358-b3b482d55103
Green, Ava
219323ea-e4da-4088-aa36-8338779acd43
Day, Nicholas
5d7a30b5-1534-4dcb-86c4-e963d6802b85
Grenyer, Brin
30aca837-5cb2-4fc6-a0d6-7a451341d629
Bach, Bo
1421a519-d86d-47af-a8a4-2c84570901ee
Hart, Claire
e3db9c72-f493-439c-a358-b3b482d55103
Green, Ava
219323ea-e4da-4088-aa36-8338779acd43
Day, Nicholas
5d7a30b5-1534-4dcb-86c4-e963d6802b85
Grenyer, Brin
30aca837-5cb2-4fc6-a0d6-7a451341d629
Bach, Bo
1421a519-d86d-47af-a8a4-2c84570901ee

Hart, Claire, Green, Ava, Day, Nicholas, Grenyer, Brin and Bach, Bo (2024) Gender bias in assessing narcissistic personality: exploring the utility of the ICD-11 dimensional model. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. (doi:10.1111/bjc.12503).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Narcissistic Personality Disorder as captured in categorical diagnostic systems (e.g., DSM-5) emphasises grandiose features more associated with masculine norms, and under-emphasises vulnerable features more associated with femininity. This poses significant implications in diagnostic outcome and clinical treatment in women with narcissistic preoccupations. Research finds that clinicians using the DSM-5 categorical system tend to diagnose vulnerable narcissism in women as other ‘feminised’ personality disorders (e.g., borderline), but no research has explored gender differences in narcissism using the new ICD-11 dimensional framework for personality disorders. This study investigated the clinical utility of the ICD-11 approach in capturing gender differences in narcissistic presentations. Adopting an online vignette-based study, mental health clinicians (N = 157; 71.3% female) completed ratings of ICD-11 personality disorder severity and trait domains for two cases reflecting ‘grandiose’ and ‘vulnerable’ narcissism in hypothetical male or female patients. Results showed that ratings of core impairments in personality functioning and overall severity were consistent irrespective of patient or clinician gender, contrasting prior research using categorical models. While some differences were observed in trait domain (e.g., negative affectivity) between patient gender, these results suggest the clinical utility of the ICD-11 model as emphasising elements of personality functioning in the process of assessment and diagnosis, therefore potentially being less susceptible to influences of gender stereotype in aiding clinical conceptualisation.

Text
ICDgender_Accepted.16.08.24 - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (89kB)
Text
Supplementary_accepted - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (19kB)
Text
British J Clinic Psychol - 2024 - Green - Gender bias in assessing narcissistic personality Exploring the utility of the - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (322kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 August 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 September 2024
Keywords: female narcissism, pathological narcissism, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, gender bias, diagnosis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 493876
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/493876
ISSN: 0144-6657
PURE UUID: 806b1fe3-4966-48a5-8205-fbd67f423337
ORCID for Claire Hart: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2175-2474

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2024 16:47
Last modified: 17 Sep 2024 01:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Claire Hart ORCID iD
Author: Ava Green
Author: Nicholas Day
Author: Brin Grenyer
Author: Bo Bach

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×