The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Hybrid mHealth care: patient perspectives of blended treatments for psychosis. A systematic review

Hybrid mHealth care: patient perspectives of blended treatments for psychosis. A systematic review
Hybrid mHealth care: patient perspectives of blended treatments for psychosis. A systematic review
Background: mHealth interventions use mobile and wireless technologies to deliver aspects of healthcare, and have been extensively employed in mental health research, showcasing their potential to address the significant treatment gap. While numerous studies underscore the advantages and functionalities of mHealth, challenges persist regarding patient uptake and sustained engagement among individuals with psychosis spectrum disorder. This review aims to explore individual-level barriers and facilitators to engagement with hybrid digital systems, which involves the integration of digital tools alongside in-person care.

Method: four electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO) were systematically searched to identify hybrid digital interventions for psychosis spectrum disorders. Studies that only reported the efficacy of the interventions were excluded. 16 studies were included in the final review.
Results
Six themes were identified in this review, including mHealth as a tool to aid communication, the central role of the therapist, an increased sense of support through the provision of digital support, allowing greater insight into auditory hallucinations, enabling technologies and barriers to engagement.

Conclusions: this review demonstrated the factors impacting engagement in hybrid interventions for psychosis spectrum disorder. By identifying barriers and facilitators, the findings could offer valuable guidance for the design of innovative digital interventions. These findings also underscore the importance of prioritising trustworthiness in digital systems. Future research should focus on establishing and implementing trustworthy digital systems to enhance engagement and effectively integrate mobile health into conventional healthcare practices.
0920-9964
Greenway, F.T.
fe35bf2e-a823-417f-b5f2-4279086c0f6e
Weal, M.
e8fd30a6-c060-41c5-b388-ca52c81032a4
Palmer-Cooper, E.C.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
Greenway, F.T.
fe35bf2e-a823-417f-b5f2-4279086c0f6e
Weal, M.
e8fd30a6-c060-41c5-b388-ca52c81032a4
Palmer-Cooper, E.C.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086

Greenway, F.T., Weal, M. and Palmer-Cooper, E.C. (2024) Hybrid mHealth care: patient perspectives of blended treatments for psychosis. A systematic review. Schizophrenia Research, 274. (doi:10.1016/j.schres.2024.08.017).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: mHealth interventions use mobile and wireless technologies to deliver aspects of healthcare, and have been extensively employed in mental health research, showcasing their potential to address the significant treatment gap. While numerous studies underscore the advantages and functionalities of mHealth, challenges persist regarding patient uptake and sustained engagement among individuals with psychosis spectrum disorder. This review aims to explore individual-level barriers and facilitators to engagement with hybrid digital systems, which involves the integration of digital tools alongside in-person care.

Method: four electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO) were systematically searched to identify hybrid digital interventions for psychosis spectrum disorders. Studies that only reported the efficacy of the interventions were excluded. 16 studies were included in the final review.
Results
Six themes were identified in this review, including mHealth as a tool to aid communication, the central role of the therapist, an increased sense of support through the provision of digital support, allowing greater insight into auditory hallucinations, enabling technologies and barriers to engagement.

Conclusions: this review demonstrated the factors impacting engagement in hybrid interventions for psychosis spectrum disorder. By identifying barriers and facilitators, the findings could offer valuable guidance for the design of innovative digital interventions. These findings also underscore the importance of prioritising trustworthiness in digital systems. Future research should focus on establishing and implementing trustworthy digital systems to enhance engagement and effectively integrate mobile health into conventional healthcare practices.

Text
GreenwayWealPalmerCooper_Hybrid mHealth Care_SchiRes_accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (231kB)
Text
1-s2.0-S092099642400389X-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (910kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 August 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 September 2024
Published date: 7 September 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494433
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494433
ISSN: 0920-9964
PURE UUID: fca9060b-ce19-4061-aef5-de956e50c194
ORCID for M. Weal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-8786
ORCID for E.C. Palmer-Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-1518

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Oct 2024 16:40
Last modified: 09 Oct 2024 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: F.T. Greenway
Author: M. Weal ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×