Exploring asymmetries in cryptocurrency intraday returns and implied volatility: new evidence for high-frequency traders
Exploring asymmetries in cryptocurrency intraday returns and implied volatility: new evidence for high-frequency traders
This paper aims to analyze the return-volatility relationship of Bitcoin and Ethereum across different return frequencies and all conditional quantiles of implied volatility, based on a unique 6.5 million observations. We employ the newly constructed Model-Free Implied Volatility (MFIV) of Bitcoin (BitVol) and Ethereum (EthVol) and use an asymmetric Quantile Regression Model (QRM) to capture the intraday asymmetric return-volatility relationship at different quantiles of the distribution of the dependent variable. Our findings show that the estimated coefficient using daily data is significant only at medium- to high-volatility regimes, while the estimated coefficients using high-frequency data are highly significant across all volatility regimes. Moreover, our results indicate that the asymmetry varies across frequencies and quantiles, with weak asymmetric effects at low quantiles and high frequencies, and strong asymmetric effects at high quantiles and low frequencies. This study provides new insight, especially for high-frequency traders.
Asymmetric, Cryptocurrencies, Quintile regression, Return frequencies, Return-volatility
Karim, Muhammad Mahmudul
8f1eca44-a644-46fb-9458-391fd2285a9d
Shah, Mohamed Eskandar
3a11c3b7-2bb4-4985-9243-bcd925534fce
Noman, Abu Hanifa Md
71108294-584d-4d58-a038-df56bc117908
Yarovaya, Larisa
2bd189e8-3bad-48b0-9d09-5d96a4132889
11 October 2024
Karim, Muhammad Mahmudul
8f1eca44-a644-46fb-9458-391fd2285a9d
Shah, Mohamed Eskandar
3a11c3b7-2bb4-4985-9243-bcd925534fce
Noman, Abu Hanifa Md
71108294-584d-4d58-a038-df56bc117908
Yarovaya, Larisa
2bd189e8-3bad-48b0-9d09-5d96a4132889
Karim, Muhammad Mahmudul, Shah, Mohamed Eskandar, Noman, Abu Hanifa Md and Yarovaya, Larisa
(2024)
Exploring asymmetries in cryptocurrency intraday returns and implied volatility: new evidence for high-frequency traders.
International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, [103617].
(doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103617).
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the return-volatility relationship of Bitcoin and Ethereum across different return frequencies and all conditional quantiles of implied volatility, based on a unique 6.5 million observations. We employ the newly constructed Model-Free Implied Volatility (MFIV) of Bitcoin (BitVol) and Ethereum (EthVol) and use an asymmetric Quantile Regression Model (QRM) to capture the intraday asymmetric return-volatility relationship at different quantiles of the distribution of the dependent variable. Our findings show that the estimated coefficient using daily data is significant only at medium- to high-volatility regimes, while the estimated coefficients using high-frequency data are highly significant across all volatility regimes. Moreover, our results indicate that the asymmetry varies across frequencies and quantiles, with weak asymmetric effects at low quantiles and high frequencies, and strong asymmetric effects at high quantiles and low frequencies. This study provides new insight, especially for high-frequency traders.
Text
High-frequency_Bitcoin_and_Ethereum_LY_final
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
1-s2.0-S1057521924005490-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 21 September 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 September 2024
Published date: 11 October 2024
Keywords:
Asymmetric, Cryptocurrencies, Quintile regression, Return frequencies, Return-volatility
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 495838
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/495838
ISSN: 1057-5219
PURE UUID: 779f55cf-6675-4d92-ab73-ba5696d57256
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Nov 2024 17:44
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:26
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Muhammad Mahmudul Karim
Author:
Mohamed Eskandar Shah
Author:
Abu Hanifa Md Noman
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics