The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

"I don’t trust it, but I have to trust it": the paradox of trust vs use of online technology across The mental health spectrum

"I don’t trust it, but I have to trust it": the paradox of trust vs use of online technology across The mental health spectrum
"I don’t trust it, but I have to trust it": the paradox of trust vs use of online technology across The mental health spectrum
Background: interest in eHealth has grown since the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Use of internet-based technologies (IBTs) and artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the delivery of mental healthcare services, however, trust remains a pivotal factor in public acceptance and adoption of these systems.

Aims: we investigated attitudes and behaviours towards eHealth services, with a focus on mental health and wellbeing provision, in the general population and individuals with experience of serious mental illness. Our investigation was underpinned by the extended technology acceptance model (TAM2), which included trust.

Methods: after trialling a cognitive training exercise involving autonomous feedback, we prompted participants’ views on and trust in IBTs, autonomous systems (AS) and AI for health care. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews in total, including 8 individuals who declared having experience of a serious mental illness.

Results: we principally identified the privacy paradox extends to eHealth, whereby individuals engaged with IBTs despite distrusting them and/or having privacy concerns regarding them, and this was across all participants. Behaviours instead were driven by both convenience, ease of use, and lack of choice or alternatives.

Conclusions:whilst trust is a factor in uptake and engagement with eHealth, there are other factors involved. It is concerning that individuals will utilise eHealth systems despite mistrusting them or their developers. There are clear ethical implications for both healthcare providers prescribing eHealth, and developers of these systems, with considerations relevant across the mental health and wellbeing spectrum. To foster trust in IBTs, particularly those using AI, a balance is needed between human and eHealth provision. This may lead to greater trust and acceptability of systems, yielding better outcomes for patients.
Gentry, E.
50e41e7f-d428-4ab0-afa4-e0f0b2e0be9a
Nichele, E.
163f6310-b37e-42be-b5d0-8f1d0eef8871
Azim, T.
4e6decad-1e15-4e87-822c-70ca0ac8654a
Naiseh, M.
ab9d6b3c-569c-4d7c-9bfd-61bbb8983049
Dowthwaite, L.
5dc18f65-ef15-4186-8a15-fb3f30a1a498
Armouch, M.S.
97fdcfff-c590-4efe-876d-b4848ee7c63b
Greenway, F.
fe35bf2e-a823-417f-b5f2-4279086c0f6e
Weal, M.J.
e8fd30a6-c060-41c5-b388-ca52c81032a4
Hughes, A.M.
11239f51-de47-4445-9a0d-5b82ddc11dea
Palmer-Cooper, E.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
Gentry, E.
50e41e7f-d428-4ab0-afa4-e0f0b2e0be9a
Nichele, E.
163f6310-b37e-42be-b5d0-8f1d0eef8871
Azim, T.
4e6decad-1e15-4e87-822c-70ca0ac8654a
Naiseh, M.
ab9d6b3c-569c-4d7c-9bfd-61bbb8983049
Dowthwaite, L.
5dc18f65-ef15-4186-8a15-fb3f30a1a498
Armouch, M.S.
97fdcfff-c590-4efe-876d-b4848ee7c63b
Greenway, F.
fe35bf2e-a823-417f-b5f2-4279086c0f6e
Weal, M.J.
e8fd30a6-c060-41c5-b388-ca52c81032a4
Hughes, A.M.
11239f51-de47-4445-9a0d-5b82ddc11dea
Palmer-Cooper, E.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Background: interest in eHealth has grown since the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Use of internet-based technologies (IBTs) and artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the delivery of mental healthcare services, however, trust remains a pivotal factor in public acceptance and adoption of these systems.

Aims: we investigated attitudes and behaviours towards eHealth services, with a focus on mental health and wellbeing provision, in the general population and individuals with experience of serious mental illness. Our investigation was underpinned by the extended technology acceptance model (TAM2), which included trust.

Methods: after trialling a cognitive training exercise involving autonomous feedback, we prompted participants’ views on and trust in IBTs, autonomous systems (AS) and AI for health care. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews in total, including 8 individuals who declared having experience of a serious mental illness.

Results: we principally identified the privacy paradox extends to eHealth, whereby individuals engaged with IBTs despite distrusting them and/or having privacy concerns regarding them, and this was across all participants. Behaviours instead were driven by both convenience, ease of use, and lack of choice or alternatives.

Conclusions:whilst trust is a factor in uptake and engagement with eHealth, there are other factors involved. It is concerning that individuals will utilise eHealth systems despite mistrusting them or their developers. There are clear ethical implications for both healthcare providers prescribing eHealth, and developers of these systems, with considerations relevant across the mental health and wellbeing spectrum. To foster trust in IBTs, particularly those using AI, a balance is needed between human and eHealth provision. This may lead to greater trust and acceptability of systems, yielding better outcomes for patients.

Text
I dont trust_JMIR_preprint - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

In preparation date: 6 November 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 496567
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/496567
PURE UUID: 034d5cd1-1c1e-45fe-9b7a-8e3a88ee6255
ORCID for M. Naiseh: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-5086
ORCID for M.J. Weal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-8786
ORCID for A.M. Hughes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-8206
ORCID for E. Palmer-Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-1518

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Dec 2024 17:35
Last modified: 20 Dec 2024 03:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E. Gentry
Author: E. Nichele
Author: T. Azim
Author: M. Naiseh ORCID iD
Author: L. Dowthwaite
Author: M.S. Armouch
Author: F. Greenway
Author: M.J. Weal ORCID iD
Author: A.M. Hughes ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×