The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Similarity based nonlinear settlement predictions of circular surface footings on clay

Similarity based nonlinear settlement predictions of circular surface footings on clay
Similarity based nonlinear settlement predictions of circular surface footings on clay
In 1951, Skempton introduced the concept of similarity to obtain predictions of non-linear settlement of rigid circular footings on deep clay deposits under undrained conditions. This approach is based on the premise that the pressure-settlement curve of the footing and a stress-strain curve from a characteristic point in the soil can be linearly scaled to collapse into a single “master” curve. The method has been extended to predict deflections of axially and laterally loaded piles and is widely used in the offshore industry. Despite the theoretical and practical appeal of the method as well as its wide application in a range of geotechnical problems, limited investigation and validation exists in the literature. In this work, (1) existing “classical” similarity methods are reviewed, including a Boussinesq solution for elastic soil and the Mobilisable Strength Design (MSD) method by Bolton and coworkers. (2) The similarity factors derived from these methods are compared with those obtained from a novel non-linear cone model solution. (3) The resulting expressions are evaluated against rigorous numerical analyses undertaken by the authors in FLAC. These are based on two different non-linear constitutive models calibrated against triaxial tests from three clay deposits. Two alternative families of similarity methods are also compared with classical similarity. (4) Firstly, a “two-part” similarity technique (based on separate scaling factors for elastic and plastic strains) and (5) secondly, a “stiffness” similarity approach introduced by Atkinson (based on secant stiffness degradation). Finally, (6) three field test results are evaluated as case studies to demonstrate the applicability of the method in real-life problems. It is concluded that similarity approaches offer a rational yet approximate tool for non-linear settlement analysis of footings.
Settlement, Soil-structure interaction, Similarity, Nonlinear analysis, Surface footings
1090-0241
Bateman, Abigail H.
f325d33d-9619-4b96-b3b9-d40bbb36d669
Crispin, Jamie J.
61fc2c73-e279-4125-a241-67eff3862904
Karamitros, Dimitris
75c46bab-c3fb-48b9-b29e-11aface3c67a
Mylonakis, George E.
8aa37314-d7c9-4962-bcc3-9a0ce1c4537b
Bateman, Abigail H.
f325d33d-9619-4b96-b3b9-d40bbb36d669
Crispin, Jamie J.
61fc2c73-e279-4125-a241-67eff3862904
Karamitros, Dimitris
75c46bab-c3fb-48b9-b29e-11aface3c67a
Mylonakis, George E.
8aa37314-d7c9-4962-bcc3-9a0ce1c4537b

Bateman, Abigail H., Crispin, Jamie J., Karamitros, Dimitris and Mylonakis, George E. (2025) Similarity based nonlinear settlement predictions of circular surface footings on clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 151 (7), [04025050]. (doi:10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12641).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In 1951, Skempton introduced the concept of similarity to obtain predictions of non-linear settlement of rigid circular footings on deep clay deposits under undrained conditions. This approach is based on the premise that the pressure-settlement curve of the footing and a stress-strain curve from a characteristic point in the soil can be linearly scaled to collapse into a single “master” curve. The method has been extended to predict deflections of axially and laterally loaded piles and is widely used in the offshore industry. Despite the theoretical and practical appeal of the method as well as its wide application in a range of geotechnical problems, limited investigation and validation exists in the literature. In this work, (1) existing “classical” similarity methods are reviewed, including a Boussinesq solution for elastic soil and the Mobilisable Strength Design (MSD) method by Bolton and coworkers. (2) The similarity factors derived from these methods are compared with those obtained from a novel non-linear cone model solution. (3) The resulting expressions are evaluated against rigorous numerical analyses undertaken by the authors in FLAC. These are based on two different non-linear constitutive models calibrated against triaxial tests from three clay deposits. Two alternative families of similarity methods are also compared with classical similarity. (4) Firstly, a “two-part” similarity technique (based on separate scaling factors for elastic and plastic strains) and (5) secondly, a “stiffness” similarity approach introduced by Atkinson (based on secant stiffness degradation). Finally, (6) three field test results are evaluated as case studies to demonstrate the applicability of the method in real-life problems. It is concluded that similarity approaches offer a rational yet approximate tool for non-linear settlement analysis of footings.

Text
Accepted Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (548kB)
Text
bateman-et-al-similarity-based-nonlinear-settlement-predictions-of-circular-surface-footings-on-clay - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 December 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 April 2025
Published date: 1 July 2025
Keywords: Settlement, Soil-structure interaction, Similarity, Nonlinear analysis, Surface footings

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 497340
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/497340
ISSN: 1090-0241
PURE UUID: 957ab1f7-00ec-495e-a35f-18d999373dc5
ORCID for Abigail H. Bateman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-1756
ORCID for Jamie J. Crispin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3074-8493

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jan 2025 17:53
Last modified: 27 Aug 2025 02:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Abigail H. Bateman ORCID iD
Author: Jamie J. Crispin ORCID iD
Author: Dimitris Karamitros
Author: George E. Mylonakis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×