The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring factors important for clinical application of cortical responses to continuous speech

Exploring factors important for clinical application of cortical responses to continuous speech
Exploring factors important for clinical application of cortical responses to continuous speech
There is considerable interest in neural responses to continuous speech. Techniques for analysing these responses typically involve tracking EEG change due to stimulus features, such as the amplitude envelope. However, the clinical utility of these measurements, especially for challenging to test subjects such as infants with hearing aids, remains under-explored. This thesis aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of neural tracking as an objective test for aided speech detection in infants. This aim was tackled through four studies designed to test factors essential for future application in infant testing in clinical environments. These factors included the feasibility of detecting responses in single-channel EEG recordings, detection time, effects of stimulus intelligibility, and attention. The two approaches used to analyse EEG signals were the temporal response function (TRF) and cross-correlation.
The first study assessed the effectiveness of single-channel EEG testing, achieving a 100% detection rate using cross-correlation within a detection time appropriate for clinical application. The second study focused on speech intelligibility effects during passive listening in recordings of cortical responses via single-channel EEG. The responses to speech-modulated noise demonstrated greater robustness regarding detectability and detection times than natural speech, indicating the potential utility of non-language-specific stimuli. Nevertheless, detection rates fell below 100%, potentially due to passive listening or shorter recording durations compared to the first study. The third study evaluated the envelope distortion induced by hearing aids using various stimuli. It found that the envelope distortion from the International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) was similar to that of natural speech, in contrast to speech-modulated noise, which exhibited significantly lower envelope distortion. The fourth study investigated the impact of different distortion levels on response detection using ISTS recordings from the third study. Higher levels of envelope distortion significantly lowered detectability and increased detection times, though using the envelope measured at the hearing aid output for detection analysis significantly improved these metrics. Additionally, no impact of attention on response detectability was observed.
In conclusion, single-channel EEG analysis showed variable detectability across different stimuli and conditions, suggesting that signal processing methods and recording times may still need to be optimised. The ISTS stimulus produced results comparable to natural speech, supporting its potential clinical use as a non-language-specific option. However, detectability was compromised in aided condition with high levels of envelope distortion. Using the speech stimulus from the output of a hearing aid (as opposed to the input signal to the aid) shows potential for improving response detectability. Additionally, the study demonstrated that neural tracking can be recorded under passive listening conditions, which could be important when testing infants.
University of Southampton
Aljarboa, Ghadah Salem
27b9a056-1941-423b-a3f2-87f851cbbf6c
Aljarboa, Ghadah Salem
27b9a056-1941-423b-a3f2-87f851cbbf6c
Bell, Steve
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a
Simpson, David
53674880-f381-4cc9-8505-6a97eeac3c2a

Aljarboa, Ghadah Salem (2025) Exploring factors important for clinical application of cortical responses to continuous speech. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 166pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

There is considerable interest in neural responses to continuous speech. Techniques for analysing these responses typically involve tracking EEG change due to stimulus features, such as the amplitude envelope. However, the clinical utility of these measurements, especially for challenging to test subjects such as infants with hearing aids, remains under-explored. This thesis aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of neural tracking as an objective test for aided speech detection in infants. This aim was tackled through four studies designed to test factors essential for future application in infant testing in clinical environments. These factors included the feasibility of detecting responses in single-channel EEG recordings, detection time, effects of stimulus intelligibility, and attention. The two approaches used to analyse EEG signals were the temporal response function (TRF) and cross-correlation.
The first study assessed the effectiveness of single-channel EEG testing, achieving a 100% detection rate using cross-correlation within a detection time appropriate for clinical application. The second study focused on speech intelligibility effects during passive listening in recordings of cortical responses via single-channel EEG. The responses to speech-modulated noise demonstrated greater robustness regarding detectability and detection times than natural speech, indicating the potential utility of non-language-specific stimuli. Nevertheless, detection rates fell below 100%, potentially due to passive listening or shorter recording durations compared to the first study. The third study evaluated the envelope distortion induced by hearing aids using various stimuli. It found that the envelope distortion from the International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) was similar to that of natural speech, in contrast to speech-modulated noise, which exhibited significantly lower envelope distortion. The fourth study investigated the impact of different distortion levels on response detection using ISTS recordings from the third study. Higher levels of envelope distortion significantly lowered detectability and increased detection times, though using the envelope measured at the hearing aid output for detection analysis significantly improved these metrics. Additionally, no impact of attention on response detectability was observed.
In conclusion, single-channel EEG analysis showed variable detectability across different stimuli and conditions, suggesting that signal processing methods and recording times may still need to be optimised. The ISTS stimulus produced results comparable to natural speech, supporting its potential clinical use as a non-language-specific option. However, detectability was compromised in aided condition with high levels of envelope distortion. Using the speech stimulus from the output of a hearing aid (as opposed to the input signal to the aid) shows potential for improving response detectability. Additionally, the study demonstrated that neural tracking can be recorded under passive listening conditions, which could be important when testing infants.

Text
Ghadah_AlJarboa_Thesis_2025 - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (3MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mrs-Ghadah-Aljarboa
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: February 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 498756
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498756
PURE UUID: e3b88378-6259-4a23-a7bb-10a1b625e181
ORCID for David Simpson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-5088

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Feb 2025 17:47
Last modified: 03 Jul 2025 01:46

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ghadah Salem Aljarboa
Thesis advisor: Steve Bell
Thesis advisor: David Simpson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×