Evaluating ADHD medication trial representativeness: a Swedish population-based study comparing hypothetically trial-eligible and ineligible individuals
Evaluating ADHD medication trial representativeness: a Swedish population-based study comparing hypothetically trial-eligible and ineligible individuals
Background: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications often use strict eligibility criteria, potentially limiting generalisability to patients in real-world clinscal settings. We aimed to 1) determine the proportion of individuals with ADHD who would be ineligible for medication RCTs and 2) evaluate differences in treatment patterns and clinical/functional outcomes between RCT-eligible and ineligible individuals.
Methods: we used Swedish national registries to identify individuals with ADHD, aged 4-68, initiating pharmacological treatment between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2019, with follow-up through December 31, 2020. Hypothetical RCT ineligibility was determined using exclusion criteria from the international MED-ADHD dataset, including 164 RCTs of ADHD medications. Cox models evaluated differences in medication switching and discontinuation within 1 year between eligible and ineligible individuals. Poisson models compared eligible and ineligible individuals on rates of psychiatric hospitalizations, injuries/accidents, and substance misuse within 1 year of initiating ADHD medications. People with lived experience were not involved in the research and writing process. Ethnicity data were not available.
Outcomes: out of 189,699 individuals (112,153 males [59%] and 77,546 [41%] females; mean age=21[range 4-68] years) initiating ADHD medication, 53% (74% of adults, 35% of adolescents, and 21% of children) would have been ineligible for RCT participation. Ineligible individuals had a higher likelihood of treatment switching (HR=1·15, 95% CI 1·12-1·17), and a decreased likelihood of medication discontinuation (HR=0·96 [0·94-0·98]) compared to eligible individuals. RCT-ineligible individuals had significantly higher rates of psychiatric hospitalizations (IRR=3·76 [3·67-3·85]) and specialist care visits related to substance misuse (IRR=3·42 [3·30-3·54]), depression (IRR=6·00 [5·94-6·06]), and anxiety (IRR=11·63 [11·56-11·69]).
Interpretation: individuals ineligible for ADHD medication trials face higher risks of adverse outcomes. This study provides the first empirical evidence for the limited generalisability of ADHD RCTs to real world clinical populations, by applying eligibility criteria extracted from a comprehensive dataset of RCTs to a large real-world cohort. Triangulating evidence from RCTs and real-world studies is crucial to inform rigorous evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Funding: National Institute of Healthcare and Research (NIHR); European Union’s Horizon 2020, Swedish Research Council.
131-139
Garcia-Argibay, Miguel
e5a6941e-4dcc-401a-9de4-09557c8856ef
Chang, Zheng
46d8b0f4-85f3-4ccd-bc4e-d176843a37e2
Brikell, Isabell
8ce0666a-d578-4128-9385-20358b875b7c
Kuja-Halkola, Ralf
e8335fa9-f245-49a8-9df4-ef31767cd3e8
D'Onofrio, Brian M.
c0b7aed7-382b-46e8-8256-03346bb3a5d7
Lichtenstein, Paul
1e1573e3-7442-4d1f-969f-17dc9b7edaa4
Newcorn, Jeffrey H.
9bfd9723-7860-472f-b85a-4c112a544bc2
Faraone, Stephen V.
bd307516-e8db-4d38-b649-9d7d7caafe93
Larsson, Henrik
4132f7c6-5d52-43a1-be38-d343e67107cf
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
21 January 2025
Garcia-Argibay, Miguel
e5a6941e-4dcc-401a-9de4-09557c8856ef
Chang, Zheng
46d8b0f4-85f3-4ccd-bc4e-d176843a37e2
Brikell, Isabell
8ce0666a-d578-4128-9385-20358b875b7c
Kuja-Halkola, Ralf
e8335fa9-f245-49a8-9df4-ef31767cd3e8
D'Onofrio, Brian M.
c0b7aed7-382b-46e8-8256-03346bb3a5d7
Lichtenstein, Paul
1e1573e3-7442-4d1f-969f-17dc9b7edaa4
Newcorn, Jeffrey H.
9bfd9723-7860-472f-b85a-4c112a544bc2
Faraone, Stephen V.
bd307516-e8db-4d38-b649-9d7d7caafe93
Larsson, Henrik
4132f7c6-5d52-43a1-be38-d343e67107cf
Cortese, Samuele
53d4bf2c-4e0e-4c77-9385-218350560fdb
Garcia-Argibay, Miguel, Chang, Zheng, Brikell, Isabell, Kuja-Halkola, Ralf, D'Onofrio, Brian M., Lichtenstein, Paul, Newcorn, Jeffrey H., Faraone, Stephen V., Larsson, Henrik and Cortese, Samuele
(2025)
Evaluating ADHD medication trial representativeness: a Swedish population-based study comparing hypothetically trial-eligible and ineligible individuals.
Lancet Psychiatry, 12 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00396-1).
Abstract
Background: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications often use strict eligibility criteria, potentially limiting generalisability to patients in real-world clinscal settings. We aimed to 1) determine the proportion of individuals with ADHD who would be ineligible for medication RCTs and 2) evaluate differences in treatment patterns and clinical/functional outcomes between RCT-eligible and ineligible individuals.
Methods: we used Swedish national registries to identify individuals with ADHD, aged 4-68, initiating pharmacological treatment between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2019, with follow-up through December 31, 2020. Hypothetical RCT ineligibility was determined using exclusion criteria from the international MED-ADHD dataset, including 164 RCTs of ADHD medications. Cox models evaluated differences in medication switching and discontinuation within 1 year between eligible and ineligible individuals. Poisson models compared eligible and ineligible individuals on rates of psychiatric hospitalizations, injuries/accidents, and substance misuse within 1 year of initiating ADHD medications. People with lived experience were not involved in the research and writing process. Ethnicity data were not available.
Outcomes: out of 189,699 individuals (112,153 males [59%] and 77,546 [41%] females; mean age=21[range 4-68] years) initiating ADHD medication, 53% (74% of adults, 35% of adolescents, and 21% of children) would have been ineligible for RCT participation. Ineligible individuals had a higher likelihood of treatment switching (HR=1·15, 95% CI 1·12-1·17), and a decreased likelihood of medication discontinuation (HR=0·96 [0·94-0·98]) compared to eligible individuals. RCT-ineligible individuals had significantly higher rates of psychiatric hospitalizations (IRR=3·76 [3·67-3·85]) and specialist care visits related to substance misuse (IRR=3·42 [3·30-3·54]), depression (IRR=6·00 [5·94-6·06]), and anxiety (IRR=11·63 [11·56-11·69]).
Interpretation: individuals ineligible for ADHD medication trials face higher risks of adverse outcomes. This study provides the first empirical evidence for the limited generalisability of ADHD RCTs to real world clinical populations, by applying eligibility criteria extracted from a comprehensive dataset of RCTs to a large real-world cohort. Triangulating evidence from RCTs and real-world studies is crucial to inform rigorous evidence-based treatment guidelines.
Funding: National Institute of Healthcare and Research (NIHR); European Union’s Horizon 2020, Swedish Research Council.
Text
Evaluating ADHD Medication Trial Representativeness
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
1-s2.0-S2215036624003961-main
- Version of Record
More information
Submitted date: 15 November 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 January 2025
Published date: 21 January 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499008
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499008
ISSN: 2215-0366
PURE UUID: 9705d978-945c-4b51-b327-114fc54c0ef1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Mar 2025 17:56
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Miguel Garcia-Argibay
Author:
Zheng Chang
Author:
Isabell Brikell
Author:
Ralf Kuja-Halkola
Author:
Brian M. D'Onofrio
Author:
Paul Lichtenstein
Author:
Jeffrey H. Newcorn
Author:
Stephen V. Faraone
Author:
Henrik Larsson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics