The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: a computational approach

Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: a computational approach
Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: a computational approach
Information regarding vaccines from sources such as health services, media, and social networks can significantly shape vaccination decisions. In particular, the dissemination of negative information can contribute to vaccine hesitancy, thereby exacerbating infectious disease outbreaks. This study investigates strategies to mitigate anti-vaccine social contagion through effective counter-campaigns that disseminate positive vaccine information and encourage vaccine uptake, aiming to reduce the size of epidemics. In a coupled agent-based model that consists of opinion and disease diffusion processes, we explore and compare different heuristics to design positive campaigns based on the network structure and local presence of negative vaccine attitudes. We examine two
campaigning regimes: a static regime with a fixed set of targets, and a dynamic regime in which targets can be updated over time. We demonstrate that strategic targeting and engagement with the dynamics of anti-vaccine influence diffusion in the network can effectively mitigate the spread of anti-vaccine sentiment, thereby reducing the epidemic size. However, the effectiveness of the campaigns differs across different targeting strategies and is impacted by a range of factors. We find that the primary advantage of static campaigns lies in their capacity to act as an obstacle, preventing the clustering of emerging anti-vaccine communities, thereby resulting in smaller and unconnected anti-vaccine groups. On the other hand, dynamic campaigns reach a broader segment of the population and adapt to the evolution of anti-vaccine diffusion, not only protecting susceptible agents from negative influence but also fostering positive propagation within negative regions.
anti-vaccine influence mitigation, complex networks, epidemic dynamics, opinion diffusion
1932-6203
Alahmadi, Sarah Hamed
1553acb6-3d5e-4c5b-bb3e-551927419348
Hoyle, Rebecca
e980d6a8-b750-491b-be13-84d695f8b8a1
Head, Michael
67ce0afc-2fc3-47f4-acf2-8794d27ce69c
Brede, Markus
bbd03865-8e0b-4372-b9d7-cd549631f3f7
Alahmadi, Sarah Hamed
1553acb6-3d5e-4c5b-bb3e-551927419348
Hoyle, Rebecca
e980d6a8-b750-491b-be13-84d695f8b8a1
Head, Michael
67ce0afc-2fc3-47f4-acf2-8794d27ce69c
Brede, Markus
bbd03865-8e0b-4372-b9d7-cd549631f3f7

Alahmadi, Sarah Hamed, Hoyle, Rebecca, Head, Michael and Brede, Markus (2025) Modelling the mitigation of anti-vaccine opinion propagation to suppress epidemic spread: a computational approach. PLoS ONE, 20 (3 March), [e0318544]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318544).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Information regarding vaccines from sources such as health services, media, and social networks can significantly shape vaccination decisions. In particular, the dissemination of negative information can contribute to vaccine hesitancy, thereby exacerbating infectious disease outbreaks. This study investigates strategies to mitigate anti-vaccine social contagion through effective counter-campaigns that disseminate positive vaccine information and encourage vaccine uptake, aiming to reduce the size of epidemics. In a coupled agent-based model that consists of opinion and disease diffusion processes, we explore and compare different heuristics to design positive campaigns based on the network structure and local presence of negative vaccine attitudes. We examine two
campaigning regimes: a static regime with a fixed set of targets, and a dynamic regime in which targets can be updated over time. We demonstrate that strategic targeting and engagement with the dynamics of anti-vaccine influence diffusion in the network can effectively mitigate the spread of anti-vaccine sentiment, thereby reducing the epidemic size. However, the effectiveness of the campaigns differs across different targeting strategies and is impacted by a range of factors. We find that the primary advantage of static campaigns lies in their capacity to act as an obstacle, preventing the clustering of emerging anti-vaccine communities, thereby resulting in smaller and unconnected anti-vaccine groups. On the other hand, dynamic campaigns reach a broader segment of the population and adapt to the evolution of anti-vaccine diffusion, not only protecting susceptible agents from negative influence but also fostering positive propagation within negative regions.

Text
Modelling_the_mitigation_of_anti_vaccine_accepted_manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 February 2025
Published date: 20 March 2025
Keywords: anti-vaccine influence mitigation, complex networks, epidemic dynamics, opinion diffusion

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499184
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499184
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: dc843587-acbe-4ae7-9607-aef302c8646f
ORCID for Rebecca Hoyle: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-1071
ORCID for Michael Head: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-0531

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2025 17:40
Last modified: 04 Sep 2025 02:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sarah Hamed Alahmadi
Author: Rebecca Hoyle ORCID iD
Author: Michael Head ORCID iD
Author: Markus Brede

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×