The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Permeability benchmarking: guidelines for comparing in silico, in vitro, and in vivo measurements

Permeability benchmarking: guidelines for comparing in silico, in vitro, and in vivo measurements
Permeability benchmarking: guidelines for comparing in silico, in vitro, and in vivo measurements
Permeability is a measure of the degree to which cellscan transport molecules across biological barriers. Units ofpermeability are distance per unit time (typically cm/s), whereaccurate measurements are needed to define drug delivery inhomeostasis and to model dysfunction occurring during disease. This perspective offers a set of community-led guidelines tobenchmark permeability data across multidisciplinary approachesand different biological contexts. First, we lay out the analyticalframework for three methodologies to calculate permeability: insilico assays using either transition-based counting or theinhomogeneous-solubility diffusion approaches, in vitro permeabilityassays using cells cultured in 2D or 3D geometries, and in vivo assaysutilizing in situ brain perfusion or multiple time-point regressionanalysis. Then, we demonstrate a systematic benchmarking of in silico to both in vitro and in vivo, depicting the ways in which eachbenchmarking is sensitive to the choices of assay design. Finally, we outline seven recommendations for best practices inpermeability benchmarking and underscore the significance of tailored permeability assays in driving advancements in drug deliveryresearch and development. Our exploration encompasses a discussion of “generic” and tissue-specific biological barriers, includingthe blood−brain barrier (BBB), which is a major hurdle for the delivery of therapeutic agents into the brain. By addressingchallenges in reconciling simulated data with experimental assays, we aim to provide insights essential for optimizing accuracy andreliability in permeability modeling.
1549-9596
1067-1084
Jorgensen, Christian
e2bbd435-983b-4059-932e-0a7f9029a422
Linville, Raleigh M.
92fdbbe5-812b-4117-bab8-57292c615afd
Galea, Ian
66209a2f-f7e6-4d63-afe4-e9299f156f0b
Lambden, Edward
2663c207-0a03-4e4c-b5ce-856591af9fdc
Vögele, Martin
e35c92b8-dc1c-44bd-a9ec-ad1afecce413
Chen, Charles
f64745af-44a9-42b8-863f-e7b99d6483e8
Troendle, Evan P.
08ed39ba-90d1-45ea-8341-f2cb022a0570
Ruggiu, Fiorella
15e0f7de-7b89-4c8e-978d-d338d48f65f4
Ulmschneider, Martin B.
4389b4d1-d769-4e9b-aa67-7fcd97d0feff
Schiøtt, Birgit
d605feac-322c-4e89-97e1-8f0d3d48939f
Lorenz, Christian D.
fd7702e5-c521-496c-84c7-da3b39e9e1e5
Jorgensen, Christian
e2bbd435-983b-4059-932e-0a7f9029a422
Linville, Raleigh M.
92fdbbe5-812b-4117-bab8-57292c615afd
Galea, Ian
66209a2f-f7e6-4d63-afe4-e9299f156f0b
Lambden, Edward
2663c207-0a03-4e4c-b5ce-856591af9fdc
Vögele, Martin
e35c92b8-dc1c-44bd-a9ec-ad1afecce413
Chen, Charles
f64745af-44a9-42b8-863f-e7b99d6483e8
Troendle, Evan P.
08ed39ba-90d1-45ea-8341-f2cb022a0570
Ruggiu, Fiorella
15e0f7de-7b89-4c8e-978d-d338d48f65f4
Ulmschneider, Martin B.
4389b4d1-d769-4e9b-aa67-7fcd97d0feff
Schiøtt, Birgit
d605feac-322c-4e89-97e1-8f0d3d48939f
Lorenz, Christian D.
fd7702e5-c521-496c-84c7-da3b39e9e1e5

Jorgensen, Christian, Linville, Raleigh M., Galea, Ian, Lambden, Edward, Vögele, Martin, Chen, Charles, Troendle, Evan P., Ruggiu, Fiorella, Ulmschneider, Martin B., Schiøtt, Birgit and Lorenz, Christian D. (2025) Permeability benchmarking: guidelines for comparing in silico, in vitro, and in vivo measurements. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 65 (3), 1067-1084. (doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01815).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Permeability is a measure of the degree to which cellscan transport molecules across biological barriers. Units ofpermeability are distance per unit time (typically cm/s), whereaccurate measurements are needed to define drug delivery inhomeostasis and to model dysfunction occurring during disease. This perspective offers a set of community-led guidelines tobenchmark permeability data across multidisciplinary approachesand different biological contexts. First, we lay out the analyticalframework for three methodologies to calculate permeability: insilico assays using either transition-based counting or theinhomogeneous-solubility diffusion approaches, in vitro permeabilityassays using cells cultured in 2D or 3D geometries, and in vivo assaysutilizing in situ brain perfusion or multiple time-point regressionanalysis. Then, we demonstrate a systematic benchmarking of in silico to both in vitro and in vivo, depicting the ways in which eachbenchmarking is sensitive to the choices of assay design. Finally, we outline seven recommendations for best practices inpermeability benchmarking and underscore the significance of tailored permeability assays in driving advancements in drug deliveryresearch and development. Our exploration encompasses a discussion of “generic” and tissue-specific biological barriers, includingthe blood−brain barrier (BBB), which is a major hurdle for the delivery of therapeutic agents into the brain. By addressingchallenges in reconciling simulated data with experimental assays, we aim to provide insights essential for optimizing accuracy andreliability in permeability modeling.

Text
jorgensen-et-al-2025-permeability-benchmarking-guidelines-for-comparing-in-silico-in-vitro-and-in-vivo-measurements - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (6MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 January 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 January 2025
Published date: 10 February 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499323
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499323
ISSN: 1549-9596
PURE UUID: 5419ad3c-49aa-4507-b485-bd5ca7189bc6
ORCID for Ian Galea: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-5102

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Mar 2025 17:31
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 01:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christian Jorgensen
Author: Raleigh M. Linville
Author: Ian Galea ORCID iD
Author: Edward Lambden
Author: Martin Vögele
Author: Charles Chen
Author: Evan P. Troendle
Author: Fiorella Ruggiu
Author: Martin B. Ulmschneider
Author: Birgit Schiøtt
Author: Christian D. Lorenz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×