The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Estimating cognitive workload using a commercial in-ear EEG headset

Estimating cognitive workload using a commercial in-ear EEG headset
Estimating cognitive workload using a commercial in-ear EEG headset
Objective: this study investigated the potential of estimating various mental workload levels during two different tasks using a commercial in-ear electroencephalography (EEG) system, the IDUN 'Guardian'. Approach. Participants performed versions of two classical workload tasks: an n-back task and a mental arithmetic task. Both in-ear and conventional EEG data were simultaneously collected during these tasks. In an effort to facilitate a more comprehensive comparison, the complexity of the tasks was intentionally increased beyond typical levels. Special emphasis was also placed on understanding the significance of γ band activity in workload estimations. Therefore, each signal was analyzed across low frequency (1–35 Hz) and high frequency (1–100 Hz) ranges. Additionally, surrogate in-ear EEG measures, derived from the conventional EEG recordings, were extracted and examined.

Main results: workload estimation using in-ear EEG yielded statistically significant performance levels, surpassing chance levels with 44.1% for four classes and 68.4% for two classes in the n-back task and was better than a naive predictor for the mental arithmetic task. Conventional EEG exhibited significantly higher performance compared to in-ear EEG, achieving 80.3% and 92.9% accuracy for the respective tasks, along with lower error rates than the naive predictor. The developed surrogate measures achieved improved results, reaching accuracies of 57.5% and 85.5%, thus providing insights for enhancing future in-ear systems. Notably, most high frequency range signals outperformed their low frequency counterparts in terms of accuracy validating that high frequency γ band features can improve workload estimation.

Significance: the application of EEG-based Brain–Computer Interfaces beyond laboratory settings is often hindered by practical limitations. In-ear EEG systems offer a promising solution to this problem, potentially enabling everyday use. This study evaluates the performance of a commercial in-ear headset and provides guidelines for increased effectiveness.
1741-2552
066022
Tremmel, Christoph
79c2855c-6daf-43b7-80f9-bc2bbf85084e
Krusienski, Dean J.
d6eaeea0-2d21-45dc-abc6-d175cb44897b
Schraefel, M.C.
63965e28-33b8-492b-9488-e2f6a781f49e
Tremmel, Christoph
79c2855c-6daf-43b7-80f9-bc2bbf85084e
Krusienski, Dean J.
d6eaeea0-2d21-45dc-abc6-d175cb44897b
Schraefel, M.C.
63965e28-33b8-492b-9488-e2f6a781f49e

Tremmel, Christoph, Krusienski, Dean J. and Schraefel, M.C. (2024) Estimating cognitive workload using a commercial in-ear EEG headset. Journal of Neural Engineering, 21 (6), 066022. (doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad8ef8).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: this study investigated the potential of estimating various mental workload levels during two different tasks using a commercial in-ear electroencephalography (EEG) system, the IDUN 'Guardian'. Approach. Participants performed versions of two classical workload tasks: an n-back task and a mental arithmetic task. Both in-ear and conventional EEG data were simultaneously collected during these tasks. In an effort to facilitate a more comprehensive comparison, the complexity of the tasks was intentionally increased beyond typical levels. Special emphasis was also placed on understanding the significance of γ band activity in workload estimations. Therefore, each signal was analyzed across low frequency (1–35 Hz) and high frequency (1–100 Hz) ranges. Additionally, surrogate in-ear EEG measures, derived from the conventional EEG recordings, were extracted and examined.

Main results: workload estimation using in-ear EEG yielded statistically significant performance levels, surpassing chance levels with 44.1% for four classes and 68.4% for two classes in the n-back task and was better than a naive predictor for the mental arithmetic task. Conventional EEG exhibited significantly higher performance compared to in-ear EEG, achieving 80.3% and 92.9% accuracy for the respective tasks, along with lower error rates than the naive predictor. The developed surrogate measures achieved improved results, reaching accuracies of 57.5% and 85.5%, thus providing insights for enhancing future in-ear systems. Notably, most high frequency range signals outperformed their low frequency counterparts in terms of accuracy validating that high frequency γ band features can improve workload estimation.

Significance: the application of EEG-based Brain–Computer Interfaces beyond laboratory settings is often hindered by practical limitations. In-ear EEG systems offer a promising solution to this problem, potentially enabling everyday use. This study evaluates the performance of a commercial in-ear headset and provides guidelines for increased effectiveness.

Text
Tremmel_2024_J._Neural_Eng._21_066022 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 November 2024
Published date: 2 December 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499459
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499459
ISSN: 1741-2552
PURE UUID: 670459bb-088e-4f90-9c93-94a2f8c99a38
ORCID for Christoph Tremmel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-6626

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Mar 2025 17:56
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christoph Tremmel ORCID iD
Author: Dean J. Krusienski
Author: M.C. Schraefel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×