Estimating cognitive workload using a commercial in-ear EEG headset
Estimating cognitive workload using a commercial in-ear EEG headset
Objective: this study investigated the potential of estimating various mental workload levels during two different tasks using a commercial in-ear electroencephalography (EEG) system, the IDUN 'Guardian'. Approach. Participants performed versions of two classical workload tasks: an n-back task and a mental arithmetic task. Both in-ear and conventional EEG data were simultaneously collected during these tasks. In an effort to facilitate a more comprehensive comparison, the complexity of the tasks was intentionally increased beyond typical levels. Special emphasis was also placed on understanding the significance of γ band activity in workload estimations. Therefore, each signal was analyzed across low frequency (1–35 Hz) and high frequency (1–100 Hz) ranges. Additionally, surrogate in-ear EEG measures, derived from the conventional EEG recordings, were extracted and examined.
Main results: workload estimation using in-ear EEG yielded statistically significant performance levels, surpassing chance levels with 44.1% for four classes and 68.4% for two classes in the n-back task and was better than a naive predictor for the mental arithmetic task. Conventional EEG exhibited significantly higher performance compared to in-ear EEG, achieving 80.3% and 92.9% accuracy for the respective tasks, along with lower error rates than the naive predictor. The developed surrogate measures achieved improved results, reaching accuracies of 57.5% and 85.5%, thus providing insights for enhancing future in-ear systems. Notably, most high frequency range signals outperformed their low frequency counterparts in terms of accuracy validating that high frequency γ band features can improve workload estimation.
Significance: the application of EEG-based Brain–Computer Interfaces beyond laboratory settings is often hindered by practical limitations. In-ear EEG systems offer a promising solution to this problem, potentially enabling everyday use. This study evaluates the performance of a commercial in-ear headset and provides guidelines for increased effectiveness.
066022
Tremmel, Christoph
79c2855c-6daf-43b7-80f9-bc2bbf85084e
Krusienski, Dean J.
d6eaeea0-2d21-45dc-abc6-d175cb44897b
Schraefel, M.C.
63965e28-33b8-492b-9488-e2f6a781f49e
2 December 2024
Tremmel, Christoph
79c2855c-6daf-43b7-80f9-bc2bbf85084e
Krusienski, Dean J.
d6eaeea0-2d21-45dc-abc6-d175cb44897b
Schraefel, M.C.
63965e28-33b8-492b-9488-e2f6a781f49e
Tremmel, Christoph, Krusienski, Dean J. and Schraefel, M.C.
(2024)
Estimating cognitive workload using a commercial in-ear EEG headset.
Journal of Neural Engineering, 21 (6), .
(doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad8ef8).
Abstract
Objective: this study investigated the potential of estimating various mental workload levels during two different tasks using a commercial in-ear electroencephalography (EEG) system, the IDUN 'Guardian'. Approach. Participants performed versions of two classical workload tasks: an n-back task and a mental arithmetic task. Both in-ear and conventional EEG data were simultaneously collected during these tasks. In an effort to facilitate a more comprehensive comparison, the complexity of the tasks was intentionally increased beyond typical levels. Special emphasis was also placed on understanding the significance of γ band activity in workload estimations. Therefore, each signal was analyzed across low frequency (1–35 Hz) and high frequency (1–100 Hz) ranges. Additionally, surrogate in-ear EEG measures, derived from the conventional EEG recordings, were extracted and examined.
Main results: workload estimation using in-ear EEG yielded statistically significant performance levels, surpassing chance levels with 44.1% for four classes and 68.4% for two classes in the n-back task and was better than a naive predictor for the mental arithmetic task. Conventional EEG exhibited significantly higher performance compared to in-ear EEG, achieving 80.3% and 92.9% accuracy for the respective tasks, along with lower error rates than the naive predictor. The developed surrogate measures achieved improved results, reaching accuracies of 57.5% and 85.5%, thus providing insights for enhancing future in-ear systems. Notably, most high frequency range signals outperformed their low frequency counterparts in terms of accuracy validating that high frequency γ band features can improve workload estimation.
Significance: the application of EEG-based Brain–Computer Interfaces beyond laboratory settings is often hindered by practical limitations. In-ear EEG systems offer a promising solution to this problem, potentially enabling everyday use. This study evaluates the performance of a commercial in-ear headset and provides guidelines for increased effectiveness.
Text
Tremmel_2024_J._Neural_Eng._21_066022
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 5 November 2024
Published date: 2 December 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 499459
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499459
ISSN: 1741-2552
PURE UUID: 670459bb-088e-4f90-9c93-94a2f8c99a38
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Mar 2025 17:56
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:34
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Christoph Tremmel
Author:
Dean J. Krusienski
Author:
M.C. Schraefel
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics