Nurse staffing configurations and nurse absence due to sickness: longitudinal study
Nurse staffing configurations and nurse absence due to sickness: longitudinal study
Importance: rates of work-related stress and sickness absence are high among nurses. The consequences of sickness absence are severe for health systems’ efficiency and productivity.
Objective: to examine the association between nurse staffing configurations and sickness absence in hospital inpatient unit nursing teams.
Design, setting, and participants: this retrospective longitudinal case-control study using routinely collected hospital data among 4 general acute care hospitals in England examined 18 674 registered nurses (RNs) and nursing support (NS) staff working in 116 hospital units. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2015, to February 29, 2020.
Exposure: nursing team skill mix, temporary staffing hours, understaffing, proportion of long shifts (≥12 hours) worked, and full-time or part-time work status in the previous 7 days.
Main outcome and measure: the main outcome was the number of episodes of sickness absence, which was defined as a sequence of sickness days with no intervening days of work.
Results: there were 2 690 080 shifts and 43 097 sickness episodes. The incident rates for starting a sickness episode were 2.0% for NSs and 1.4% for RNs. In total, there were 18 674 members of staff; 2 188 562 (81.6%) were shifts by staff classified as working full time and 493 400 (18.4%) by staff classified as working part time. A skill mix composed of more RNs was associated with a 2% reduction in the odds of RN sickness absence for each 10% change in the proportion of RN hours (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99). Moving from the lower quartile skill mix (ie, approximately 55% of the nursing hours worked by RNs) to the upper quartile (ie, approximately 75% of the nursing hours worked by RNs) was associated with a 4% reduction in odds of sickness absence. Working only long shifts in the prior 7 days was associated with a 26% increase in the odds of sickness absence for RNs compared with working no long shifts (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19-1.33). Part-time work for RNs was associated with higher sickness absence (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.15). For RNs, there was a significant interaction between part-time work and RN understaffing, whereby short staffing in the previous week increased sickness absence for full-time staff but not among those working part time. NS understaffing was not associated with sickness absence for any staffing group.
Conclusions and relevance: this retrospective case-control study found that exposure to RN understaffing increased the risk of sickness absence in nursing teams. Adverse working conditions for nurses, already known to pose a risk to patient safety, may also create risks for nurses and the possibility of further exacerbating staff shortages.
e255946
Dall'Ora, Chiara
4501b172-005c-4fad-86da-2d63978ffdfd
Meredith, Paul
652fc110-7cba-48c3-bfba-264c43324626
Saville, Christina
2c726abd-1604-458c-bc0b-daeef1b084bd
Jones, Jeremy
270b303b-6bad-4be7-8ea0-63d0e8015c91
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
22 April 2025
Dall'Ora, Chiara
4501b172-005c-4fad-86da-2d63978ffdfd
Meredith, Paul
652fc110-7cba-48c3-bfba-264c43324626
Saville, Christina
2c726abd-1604-458c-bc0b-daeef1b084bd
Jones, Jeremy
270b303b-6bad-4be7-8ea0-63d0e8015c91
Griffiths, Peter
ac7afec1-7d72-4b83-b016-3a43e245265b
Dall'Ora, Chiara, Meredith, Paul, Saville, Christina, Jones, Jeremy and Griffiths, Peter
(2025)
Nurse staffing configurations and nurse absence due to sickness: longitudinal study.
JAMA Network Open, 8 (4), , [e255946].
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5946).
Abstract
Importance: rates of work-related stress and sickness absence are high among nurses. The consequences of sickness absence are severe for health systems’ efficiency and productivity.
Objective: to examine the association between nurse staffing configurations and sickness absence in hospital inpatient unit nursing teams.
Design, setting, and participants: this retrospective longitudinal case-control study using routinely collected hospital data among 4 general acute care hospitals in England examined 18 674 registered nurses (RNs) and nursing support (NS) staff working in 116 hospital units. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2015, to February 29, 2020.
Exposure: nursing team skill mix, temporary staffing hours, understaffing, proportion of long shifts (≥12 hours) worked, and full-time or part-time work status in the previous 7 days.
Main outcome and measure: the main outcome was the number of episodes of sickness absence, which was defined as a sequence of sickness days with no intervening days of work.
Results: there were 2 690 080 shifts and 43 097 sickness episodes. The incident rates for starting a sickness episode were 2.0% for NSs and 1.4% for RNs. In total, there were 18 674 members of staff; 2 188 562 (81.6%) were shifts by staff classified as working full time and 493 400 (18.4%) by staff classified as working part time. A skill mix composed of more RNs was associated with a 2% reduction in the odds of RN sickness absence for each 10% change in the proportion of RN hours (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99). Moving from the lower quartile skill mix (ie, approximately 55% of the nursing hours worked by RNs) to the upper quartile (ie, approximately 75% of the nursing hours worked by RNs) was associated with a 4% reduction in odds of sickness absence. Working only long shifts in the prior 7 days was associated with a 26% increase in the odds of sickness absence for RNs compared with working no long shifts (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19-1.33). Part-time work for RNs was associated with higher sickness absence (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.15). For RNs, there was a significant interaction between part-time work and RN understaffing, whereby short staffing in the previous week increased sickness absence for full-time staff but not among those working part time. NS understaffing was not associated with sickness absence for any staffing group.
Conclusions and relevance: this retrospective case-control study found that exposure to RN understaffing increased the risk of sickness absence in nursing teams. Adverse working conditions for nurses, already known to pose a risk to patient safety, may also create risks for nurses and the possibility of further exacerbating staff shortages.
Text
WHOs_staffing_and_sickness_JAMA_R2_clean
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
dallora_2025_oi_250243_1744746619.64687
- Version of Record
Text
WHOs staffing and sickness_JAMA_R2_clean
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 19 January 2025
Published date: 22 April 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500249
ISSN: 2574-3805
PURE UUID: feac32de-dfb8-4657-81c9-05dac337a2b6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Apr 2025 16:43
Last modified: 30 Aug 2025 02:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Paul Meredith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics