Supporting families after the unexpected death of a child: greater access to multidisciplinary bereavement services is essential
Supporting families after the unexpected death of a child: greater access to multidisciplinary bereavement services is essential
Sudden Unexpected Death in Children (SUDIC), encompassing causes such as accidents, suicides, and unexplained medical conditions, constitutes one-third of all child deaths in higher-income countries. These events are deeply traumatic for families, leading to enduring psychological distress and significant unmet bereavement support needs. Thirty years after research first highlighted the lack of support for families affected by SUDIC, many still face isolation and limited access to bereavement care. Investigations into a child’s death often compound trauma, as families navigate interactions with police, coroners, and medical examiners without adequate emotional or practical support. Trauma experienced during this time profoundly impacts family mental health, frequently leading to conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression.
Support for professionals responding to SUDIC is also limited, leaving them vulnerable to the psychological toll of traumatic exposure. Few receive training in providing bereavement care, and many rely on coping strategies that inadvertently heighten parents' distress.
Despite these challenges, inequities persist, with palliative care frameworks historically prioritising life-limiting conditions and neglecting families affected by SUDIC. Examples of integrated bereavement care models—such as Sweden’s national guidelines, Wales’ 2Wish charity, and England’s Joint Agency Response (JAR)—demonstrate the potential for systemic solutions. However, variability in implementation and a lack of robust evaluation metrics underscore the urgent need for research to measure the effectiveness of such programmes. Healthcare systems must prioritise the integration of bereavement and emergency services to ensure immediate, culturally sensitive, and comprehensive support for SUDIC families. This requires collaboration across sectors, led by palliative care services, with investment in workforce training and psychosocial interventions. Addressing these gaps is critical to mitigating the devastating psychological toll of SUDIC on families and responders alike.
Hunt, Katherine
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Uhm, Seilin
dfc997ea-0b4b-4146-b743-eb5fa99d2200
Finlay, Ilora
448f3181-9c89-4ec7-ba73-047b84ff7138
Darlington, Anne-Sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
28 April 2025
Hunt, Katherine
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Uhm, Seilin
dfc997ea-0b4b-4146-b743-eb5fa99d2200
Finlay, Ilora
448f3181-9c89-4ec7-ba73-047b84ff7138
Darlington, Anne-Sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Hunt, Katherine, Uhm, Seilin, Finlay, Ilora and Darlington, Anne-Sophie
(2025)
Supporting families after the unexpected death of a child: greater access to multidisciplinary bereavement services is essential.
The BMJ, 389, [e082885].
(doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-082885).
Abstract
Sudden Unexpected Death in Children (SUDIC), encompassing causes such as accidents, suicides, and unexplained medical conditions, constitutes one-third of all child deaths in higher-income countries. These events are deeply traumatic for families, leading to enduring psychological distress and significant unmet bereavement support needs. Thirty years after research first highlighted the lack of support for families affected by SUDIC, many still face isolation and limited access to bereavement care. Investigations into a child’s death often compound trauma, as families navigate interactions with police, coroners, and medical examiners without adequate emotional or practical support. Trauma experienced during this time profoundly impacts family mental health, frequently leading to conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression.
Support for professionals responding to SUDIC is also limited, leaving them vulnerable to the psychological toll of traumatic exposure. Few receive training in providing bereavement care, and many rely on coping strategies that inadvertently heighten parents' distress.
Despite these challenges, inequities persist, with palliative care frameworks historically prioritising life-limiting conditions and neglecting families affected by SUDIC. Examples of integrated bereavement care models—such as Sweden’s national guidelines, Wales’ 2Wish charity, and England’s Joint Agency Response (JAR)—demonstrate the potential for systemic solutions. However, variability in implementation and a lack of robust evaluation metrics underscore the urgent need for research to measure the effectiveness of such programmes. Healthcare systems must prioritise the integration of bereavement and emergency services to ensure immediate, culturally sensitive, and comprehensive support for SUDIC families. This requires collaboration across sectors, led by palliative care services, with investment in workforce training and psychosocial interventions. Addressing these gaps is critical to mitigating the devastating psychological toll of SUDIC on families and responders alike.
Text
Hunt et al (2025) BMJ Preprint
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Hunt et al (2025) BMJ
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Hunt121224.6ja_SU (002)
- Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Submitted date: 4 December 2024
Accepted/In Press date: 28 April 2025
Published date: 28 April 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500319
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500319
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: af765d36-ad58-4699-940b-dc0307f2965d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Apr 2025 16:48
Last modified: 29 Aug 2025 01:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Seilin Uhm
Author:
Ilora Finlay
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics