Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes
Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes
There is an increasing reliance on passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) as a cost-effective method for monitoring cetaceans, necessitating robust and efficient automated tools for extracting species presence. This work compares two methods, one based on the ‘off-line’ analysis of raw PAM data, using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and the second based on in-situ detections, implemented within the C-POD. The C-POD is a rapid, low-cost choice for monitoring of odontocetes, while CNNs, requiring large efforts to train, are gaining traction within bioacoustics as they offer performance benefits above standard detection and classification tools. This work represents the first empirical comparison of a C-POD with a system using a CNN on recorded raw acoustic data for monitoring delphinids. The comparison is based on 3000 hours of PAM data, collected off the west coast of Scotland, using a collocated C-POD and SoundTrap acoustic recorder. Results show that the system using a CNN achieves an overall accuracy of 0.82, and an effectiveness (F1-Score) of 0.78 as a click detector, whilst the C-POD achieves scores of 0.71 and 0.62, respectively. The method employing a CNN provides a lower missed detection rate, with the C-POD failing to detect > 90% delphinid positive hours at one focal site. However, the C-POD offered a lower false-positive rate across all analysis sites. This work highlights the importance of incorporating the right automated tools for long-term species monitoring, as the C-POD offers high precision rates for click detections, while the CNN based system provides a robust approach to identifying seasonal and diurnal trends in long-term dolphin occurrence.
machine learning, passive acoustic monitoring, marine mammal, bioacoustics, marine ecology, conservation
White, Ellen L.
50575aff-8aa1-4ee4-82e6-7e1bc5eefc70
White, Paul R.
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
Bull, Jonathan M.
974037fd-544b-458f-98cc-ce8eca89e3c8
Risch, Denise
36f7efba-6853-41e9-b79e-b409b1a79d56
Quer, Susanna
5c7e9a30-9d8a-4e84-a1b1-f1147ea6dfc3
Beck, Suzanne
a52fda37-be42-4fdf-9854-656e38fbb71d
11 June 2025
White, Ellen L.
50575aff-8aa1-4ee4-82e6-7e1bc5eefc70
White, Paul R.
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
Bull, Jonathan M.
974037fd-544b-458f-98cc-ce8eca89e3c8
Risch, Denise
36f7efba-6853-41e9-b79e-b409b1a79d56
Quer, Susanna
5c7e9a30-9d8a-4e84-a1b1-f1147ea6dfc3
Beck, Suzanne
a52fda37-be42-4fdf-9854-656e38fbb71d
White, Ellen L., White, Paul R., Bull, Jonathan M., Risch, Denise, Quer, Susanna and Beck, Suzanne
(2025)
Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes.
PlosOne.
Abstract
There is an increasing reliance on passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) as a cost-effective method for monitoring cetaceans, necessitating robust and efficient automated tools for extracting species presence. This work compares two methods, one based on the ‘off-line’ analysis of raw PAM data, using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and the second based on in-situ detections, implemented within the C-POD. The C-POD is a rapid, low-cost choice for monitoring of odontocetes, while CNNs, requiring large efforts to train, are gaining traction within bioacoustics as they offer performance benefits above standard detection and classification tools. This work represents the first empirical comparison of a C-POD with a system using a CNN on recorded raw acoustic data for monitoring delphinids. The comparison is based on 3000 hours of PAM data, collected off the west coast of Scotland, using a collocated C-POD and SoundTrap acoustic recorder. Results show that the system using a CNN achieves an overall accuracy of 0.82, and an effectiveness (F1-Score) of 0.78 as a click detector, whilst the C-POD achieves scores of 0.71 and 0.62, respectively. The method employing a CNN provides a lower missed detection rate, with the C-POD failing to detect > 90% delphinid positive hours at one focal site. However, the C-POD offered a lower false-positive rate across all analysis sites. This work highlights the importance of incorporating the right automated tools for long-term species monitoring, as the C-POD offers high precision rates for click detections, while the CNN based system provides a robust approach to identifying seasonal and diurnal trends in long-term dolphin occurrence.
Text
PONE-D-24-44181R2_FTC_ELW
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 24 April 2025
Published date: 11 June 2025
Keywords:
machine learning, passive acoustic monitoring, marine mammal, bioacoustics, marine ecology, conservation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500699
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500699
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 096feb02-1b2b-4b42-931c-5cc655504757
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 May 2025 17:17
Last modified: 13 Jun 2025 02:12
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Ellen L. White
Author:
Denise Risch
Author:
Susanna Quer
Author:
Suzanne Beck
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics