The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes

Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes
Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes
There is an increasing reliance on passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) as a cost-effective method for monitoring cetaceans, necessitating robust and efficient automated tools for extracting species presence. This work compares two methods, one based on the ‘off-line’ analysis of raw PAM data, using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and the second based on in-situ detections, implemented within the C-POD. The C-POD is a rapid, low-cost choice for monitoring of odontocetes, while CNNs, requiring large efforts to train, are gaining traction within bioacoustics as they offer performance benefits above standard detection and classification tools. This work represents the first empirical comparison of a C-POD with a system using a CNN on recorded raw acoustic data for monitoring delphinids. The comparison is based on 3000 hours of PAM data, collected off the west coast of Scotland, using a collocated C-POD and SoundTrap acoustic recorder. Results show that the system using a CNN achieves an overall accuracy of 0.82, and an effectiveness (F1-Score) of 0.78 as a click detector, whilst the C-POD achieves scores of 0.71 and 0.62, respectively. The method employing a CNN provides a lower missed detection rate, with the C-POD failing to detect > 90% delphinid positive hours at one focal site. However, the C-POD offered a lower false-positive rate across all analysis sites. This work highlights the importance of incorporating the right automated tools for long-term species monitoring, as the C-POD offers high precision rates for click detections, while the CNN based system provides a robust approach to identifying seasonal and diurnal trends in long-term dolphin occurrence.
machine learning, passive acoustic monitoring, marine mammal, bioacoustics, marine ecology, conservation
1932-6203
White, Ellen L.
50575aff-8aa1-4ee4-82e6-7e1bc5eefc70
White, Paul R.
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
Bull, Jonathan M.
974037fd-544b-458f-98cc-ce8eca89e3c8
Risch, Denise
36f7efba-6853-41e9-b79e-b409b1a79d56
Quer, Susanna
5c7e9a30-9d8a-4e84-a1b1-f1147ea6dfc3
Beck, Suzanne
a52fda37-be42-4fdf-9854-656e38fbb71d
White, Ellen L.
50575aff-8aa1-4ee4-82e6-7e1bc5eefc70
White, Paul R.
2dd2477b-5aa9-42e2-9d19-0806d994eaba
Bull, Jonathan M.
974037fd-544b-458f-98cc-ce8eca89e3c8
Risch, Denise
36f7efba-6853-41e9-b79e-b409b1a79d56
Quer, Susanna
5c7e9a30-9d8a-4e84-a1b1-f1147ea6dfc3
Beck, Suzanne
a52fda37-be42-4fdf-9854-656e38fbb71d

White, Ellen L., White, Paul R., Bull, Jonathan M., Risch, Denise, Quer, Susanna and Beck, Suzanne (2025) Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes. PlosOne.

Record type: Article

Abstract

There is an increasing reliance on passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) as a cost-effective method for monitoring cetaceans, necessitating robust and efficient automated tools for extracting species presence. This work compares two methods, one based on the ‘off-line’ analysis of raw PAM data, using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and the second based on in-situ detections, implemented within the C-POD. The C-POD is a rapid, low-cost choice for monitoring of odontocetes, while CNNs, requiring large efforts to train, are gaining traction within bioacoustics as they offer performance benefits above standard detection and classification tools. This work represents the first empirical comparison of a C-POD with a system using a CNN on recorded raw acoustic data for monitoring delphinids. The comparison is based on 3000 hours of PAM data, collected off the west coast of Scotland, using a collocated C-POD and SoundTrap acoustic recorder. Results show that the system using a CNN achieves an overall accuracy of 0.82, and an effectiveness (F1-Score) of 0.78 as a click detector, whilst the C-POD achieves scores of 0.71 and 0.62, respectively. The method employing a CNN provides a lower missed detection rate, with the C-POD failing to detect > 90% delphinid positive hours at one focal site. However, the C-POD offered a lower false-positive rate across all analysis sites. This work highlights the importance of incorporating the right automated tools for long-term species monitoring, as the C-POD offers high precision rates for click detections, while the CNN based system provides a robust approach to identifying seasonal and diurnal trends in long-term dolphin occurrence.

Text
PONE-D-24-44181R2_FTC_ELW - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (83kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 April 2025
Published date: 11 June 2025
Keywords: machine learning, passive acoustic monitoring, marine mammal, bioacoustics, marine ecology, conservation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 500699
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500699
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 096feb02-1b2b-4b42-931c-5cc655504757
ORCID for Ellen L. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3787-8699
ORCID for Paul R. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4787-8713
ORCID for Jonathan M. Bull: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3373-5807

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 May 2025 17:17
Last modified: 13 Jun 2025 02:12

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ellen L. White ORCID iD
Author: Paul R. White ORCID iD
Author: Denise Risch
Author: Susanna Quer
Author: Suzanne Beck

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×