Calibrating resistance factors of pile groups based on individual pile proof load tests
Calibrating resistance factors of pile groups based on individual pile proof load tests
Pile load tests have been utilized to reduce the uncertainty of pile resistance, thus leading to a higher resistance factor used in the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Previous studies have primarily focused on calibrating resistance factors for single piles based on load tests. This calibration hinges upon the resistance bias factor of single piles, defined as the ratio of measured resistance to predicted resistance. Due to the redundancy in the pile group system, it is conventionally assumed that if the individual piles within the group achieve a lower reliability index (e.g., 2.0–2.5), the pile group as a whole attains the target reliability index of 3. However, the approach is empirical as it does not consider system redundancy directly. Moreover, this empirical approach disregards the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles, which is inherently influenced by the spatial variability of soils. In this study, the random finite difference method (RFDM) is employed to evaluate the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles in spatially variable soils. The resultant correlation matrix is subsequentially employed in Bayes’ theorem to update resistance bias factors using individual pile load test results and their corresponding test locations. The updated resistance bias factors are then used for the direct calibration of resistance factors for pile groups within the framework of LRFD. A pile group subject to vertical loading in undrained clays is adopted for illustration. Comparative analyses between the proposed approach and the empirical approach demonstrate that the latter tends to overestimate the resistance factor. Furthermore, the proposed approach enables the determination of optimal locations for conducting subsequent load tests based on previous test results.
Bayes’ theorem, Pile group, Random finite difference method, Resistance factor
Zhang, Yuting
821b7687-fe98-4525-b641-2ea503797319
Huang, Jinsong
da153fad-3446-47fc-8b4a-5799e42fb59e
Xie, Jiawei
8f5bdf89-fcac-4336-a371-9f138872a28b
Huang, Shan
a579e02b-52c8-4a89-b81a-aaed69ac5114
Wang, Yankun
5188ab61-3534-4145-8078-7bf9b81323f2
2 August 2024
Zhang, Yuting
821b7687-fe98-4525-b641-2ea503797319
Huang, Jinsong
da153fad-3446-47fc-8b4a-5799e42fb59e
Xie, Jiawei
8f5bdf89-fcac-4336-a371-9f138872a28b
Huang, Shan
a579e02b-52c8-4a89-b81a-aaed69ac5114
Wang, Yankun
5188ab61-3534-4145-8078-7bf9b81323f2
Zhang, Yuting, Huang, Jinsong, Xie, Jiawei, Huang, Shan and Wang, Yankun
(2024)
Calibrating resistance factors of pile groups based on individual pile proof load tests.
Structural Safety, 111, [102517].
(doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102517).
Abstract
Pile load tests have been utilized to reduce the uncertainty of pile resistance, thus leading to a higher resistance factor used in the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD). Previous studies have primarily focused on calibrating resistance factors for single piles based on load tests. This calibration hinges upon the resistance bias factor of single piles, defined as the ratio of measured resistance to predicted resistance. Due to the redundancy in the pile group system, it is conventionally assumed that if the individual piles within the group achieve a lower reliability index (e.g., 2.0–2.5), the pile group as a whole attains the target reliability index of 3. However, the approach is empirical as it does not consider system redundancy directly. Moreover, this empirical approach disregards the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles, which is inherently influenced by the spatial variability of soils. In this study, the random finite difference method (RFDM) is employed to evaluate the correlation between resistance bias factors of individual piles in spatially variable soils. The resultant correlation matrix is subsequentially employed in Bayes’ theorem to update resistance bias factors using individual pile load test results and their corresponding test locations. The updated resistance bias factors are then used for the direct calibration of resistance factors for pile groups within the framework of LRFD. A pile group subject to vertical loading in undrained clays is adopted for illustration. Comparative analyses between the proposed approach and the empirical approach demonstrate that the latter tends to overestimate the resistance factor. Furthermore, the proposed approach enables the determination of optimal locations for conducting subsequent load tests based on previous test results.
Text
1-s2.0-S0167473024000882-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 July 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 July 2024
Published date: 2 August 2024
Keywords:
Bayes’ theorem, Pile group, Random finite difference method, Resistance factor
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 501501
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501501
ISSN: 0167-4730
PURE UUID: ca52645f-e5c8-4c0c-a1f0-227939b24fcb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jun 2025 16:31
Last modified: 21 Aug 2025 02:53
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yuting Zhang
Author:
Jinsong Huang
Author:
Jiawei Xie
Author:
Shan Huang
Author:
Yankun Wang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics