Defining logical systems via algebraic constraints on proofs
Defining logical systems via algebraic constraints on proofs
We present a comprehensive programme analysing the decomposition of proof systems for non-classical logics into proof systems for other logics, especially classical logic, using an algebra of constraints. That is, one recovers a proof system for a target logic by enriching a proof system for another, typically simpler, logic with an algebra of constraints that act as correctness conditions on the latter to capture the former; e.g. one may use Boolean algebra to give constraints in a sequent calculus for classical propositional logic to produce a sequent calculus for intuitionistic propositional logic. The idea behind such forms of decomposition is to obtain a tool for uniform and modular treatment of proof theory and to provide a bridge between semantics logics and their proof theory. The paper discusses the theoretical background of the project and provides several illustrations of its work in the field of intuitionistic and modal logics: including, a uniform treatment of modular and cut-free proof systems for a large class of propositional logics; a general criterion for a novel approach to soundness and completeness of a logic with respect to a model-theoretic semantics; and a case study deriving a model-theoretic semantics from a proof-theoretic specification of a logic.
95-146
Gheorghiu, Alexander V.
4569dbd7-8426-4631-80a1-424e922436da
Pym, David J
dcd2c0b6-80dd-4486-9649-8f0ee547d110
24 November 2023
Gheorghiu, Alexander V.
4569dbd7-8426-4631-80a1-424e922436da
Pym, David J
dcd2c0b6-80dd-4486-9649-8f0ee547d110
Gheorghiu, Alexander V. and Pym, David J
(2023)
Defining logical systems via algebraic constraints on proofs.
Journal of Logic and Computation, 35 (1), .
(doi:10.1093/logcom/exad065).
Abstract
We present a comprehensive programme analysing the decomposition of proof systems for non-classical logics into proof systems for other logics, especially classical logic, using an algebra of constraints. That is, one recovers a proof system for a target logic by enriching a proof system for another, typically simpler, logic with an algebra of constraints that act as correctness conditions on the latter to capture the former; e.g. one may use Boolean algebra to give constraints in a sequent calculus for classical propositional logic to produce a sequent calculus for intuitionistic propositional logic. The idea behind such forms of decomposition is to obtain a tool for uniform and modular treatment of proof theory and to provide a bridge between semantics logics and their proof theory. The paper discusses the theoretical background of the project and provides several illustrations of its work in the field of intuitionistic and modal logics: including, a uniform treatment of modular and cut-free proof systems for a large class of propositional logics; a general criterion for a novel approach to soundness and completeness of a logic with respect to a model-theoretic semantics; and a case study deriving a model-theoretic semantics from a proof-theoretic specification of a logic.
Text
exad065
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 October 2023
Published date: 24 November 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502012
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502012
ISSN: 0955-792X
PURE UUID: ba6dc3a7-6c9f-4497-8f83-fa09304e4290
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Jun 2025 16:36
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alexander V. Gheorghiu
Author:
David J Pym
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics