Bayes factors for sequential auditory brainstem response detection
Bayes factors for sequential auditory brainstem response detection
Objective: when determining the presence or absence of an Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), clinicians often visually inspect the accruing data over time, i.e., a sequential test is adopted. The current work presents and evaluates Bayes Factors (BFs) as an objective sequential test for assisting clinicians with this task.
Method: test specificity and sensitivity were optimised in simulated data and evaluated in subject-recorded data, including no-stimulus recordings (17 adults) and chirp-evoked ABR recordings (31 adults, 9 with hearing loss). The BF approach was compared with an existing sequential test, called the Convolutional Group Sequential Test (CGST).
Results: in simulations, BFs reduced mean test times by 60–70 % relative to the CGST while maintaining equal sensitivity and specificity. Similar reductions were observed in subject-recorded EEG background activity (∼70 %) and in chirp-evoked ABRs (0–60 %, depending on stimulus levels). For BFs, test time is tied to noise levels in the data, which allows test sensitivity to be controlled even when noise levels are high. The drawback is that the FPR is also tied to test time, and results show small variations (<0.01) in FPRs depending on noise levels. In contrast, test time for the CGST is fixed, giving an improved control over the FPR, but a reduced control over test sensitivity.
Significance: BFs demonstrated high sensitivity and reduced mean test times relative to the CGST. It also provides regular feedback with no maximum test time specified, making it well-suited at assisting clinicians with different levels of expertise and feedback preferences.
Auditory Brainstem Response, Auditory Evoked Potentials, Bayes Factors, Objective Detection Methods, Sequential Testing
Chesnaye, M.A.
5f337509-3255-4322-b1bf-d4d3836b36ec
Simpson, D.M.
53674880-f381-4cc9-8505-6a97eeac3c2a
Schlittenlacher, J.
4aa19f82-bc26-4c29-b52d-0be449ad91d2
Laugesen, S.
6d308686-7faa-44a5-8aab-7e144a2ba919
Bell, S.L.
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a
15 May 2025
Chesnaye, M.A.
5f337509-3255-4322-b1bf-d4d3836b36ec
Simpson, D.M.
53674880-f381-4cc9-8505-6a97eeac3c2a
Schlittenlacher, J.
4aa19f82-bc26-4c29-b52d-0be449ad91d2
Laugesen, S.
6d308686-7faa-44a5-8aab-7e144a2ba919
Bell, S.L.
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a
Chesnaye, M.A., Simpson, D.M., Schlittenlacher, J., Laugesen, S. and Bell, S.L.
(2025)
Bayes factors for sequential auditory brainstem response detection.
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 108, [107937].
(doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107937).
Abstract
Objective: when determining the presence or absence of an Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), clinicians often visually inspect the accruing data over time, i.e., a sequential test is adopted. The current work presents and evaluates Bayes Factors (BFs) as an objective sequential test for assisting clinicians with this task.
Method: test specificity and sensitivity were optimised in simulated data and evaluated in subject-recorded data, including no-stimulus recordings (17 adults) and chirp-evoked ABR recordings (31 adults, 9 with hearing loss). The BF approach was compared with an existing sequential test, called the Convolutional Group Sequential Test (CGST).
Results: in simulations, BFs reduced mean test times by 60–70 % relative to the CGST while maintaining equal sensitivity and specificity. Similar reductions were observed in subject-recorded EEG background activity (∼70 %) and in chirp-evoked ABRs (0–60 %, depending on stimulus levels). For BFs, test time is tied to noise levels in the data, which allows test sensitivity to be controlled even when noise levels are high. The drawback is that the FPR is also tied to test time, and results show small variations (<0.01) in FPRs depending on noise levels. In contrast, test time for the CGST is fixed, giving an improved control over the FPR, but a reduced control over test sensitivity.
Significance: BFs demonstrated high sensitivity and reduced mean test times relative to the CGST. It also provides regular feedback with no maximum test time specified, making it well-suited at assisting clinicians with different levels of expertise and feedback preferences.
Text
1-s2.0-S1746809425004483-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 April 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 May 2025
Published date: 15 May 2025
Keywords:
Auditory Brainstem Response, Auditory Evoked Potentials, Bayes Factors, Objective Detection Methods, Sequential Testing
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502733
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502733
ISSN: 1746-8094
PURE UUID: 39516f07-3c23-4262-bfdb-06da1b79674e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jul 2025 16:47
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 01:49
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M.A. Chesnaye
Author:
J. Schlittenlacher
Author:
S. Laugesen
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
