The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Head and neck cooling does not improve maximal voluntary torque or rate or torque development during brief maximal voluntary contractions in the heat

Head and neck cooling does not improve maximal voluntary torque or rate or torque development during brief maximal voluntary contractions in the heat
Head and neck cooling does not improve maximal voluntary torque or rate or torque development during brief maximal voluntary contractions in the heat
Introduction: maximal voluntary torque (MVT) is impaired when hyperthermic due to a reduction in the central nervous system’s capacity to voluntarily drive the available force capacity of muscle. Rate of torque development (RTD) is considered more functionally relevant than MVT in some situations and neural drive is a key determinant of RTD. Head and neck cooling can improve endurance performance when hyperthermic, but its effects on neural drive are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate head and neck cooling on thermal perception during whole-body hyperthermia on MVT, RTD, neural drive and the contractile properties of the muscle.

Method: 9 participants completed two trials in HOT conditions (50°C, 40% RH), involving light exercise before passive heating to a rectal temperature (Tre) of 39.5°C. During one trial, the head and neck was continuously cooled (HOTcool) using a towel soaked in ice water. At Tre=39.5°C neuromuscular measurements were completed to assess MVT, voluntary activation and EMG at MVT normalised to maximal M-wave. Voluntary RTD and normalised EMG were measured over 0-50, 0-100, 0-150 and 0-200 ms. Involuntary RTD at 0-50 ms was measured during evoked octets at 300 Hz. Thermoregulatory and perceptual variables were measured throughout.

Results: MVT and RTD, and their neuromuscular determinants were unaffected by cooling (P > 0.05). Neck (-20%) and head (-12%) temperature were lower in HOTcool, as were thermal sensation of the head (-36%) and body (-12%) and thermal comfort (body) (-23%). Time to target Tre was increased (71%) in HOTcool, and not all participants were able to reach 39.5°C. Tre (-0.3%) and skin temperature (-6%) were lower in HOTcool (P < 0.05), but heart rate was similar (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: head and neck cooling did not affect MVT, RTD, or the neuromuscular determinants of these functional variables despite improving perceptions of thermal strain.

Gordon, Ralph
00e4cfb1-43a6-4702-acd1-e6f2643f7531
Tillin, Neale Anthony
da771b23-7207-400b-aa1d-4a07c82aaaab
Tyler, Christopher James
9faa5e93-c463-482f-add9-92dea169d167
Gordon, Ralph
00e4cfb1-43a6-4702-acd1-e6f2643f7531
Tillin, Neale Anthony
da771b23-7207-400b-aa1d-4a07c82aaaab
Tyler, Christopher James
9faa5e93-c463-482f-add9-92dea169d167

Gordon, Ralph, Tillin, Neale Anthony and Tyler, Christopher James (2019) Head and neck cooling does not improve maximal voluntary torque or rate or torque development during brief maximal voluntary contractions in the heat. 18th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics, , Amsterdam, Netherlands. 07 - 12 Jul 2019. 1 pp .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

Introduction: maximal voluntary torque (MVT) is impaired when hyperthermic due to a reduction in the central nervous system’s capacity to voluntarily drive the available force capacity of muscle. Rate of torque development (RTD) is considered more functionally relevant than MVT in some situations and neural drive is a key determinant of RTD. Head and neck cooling can improve endurance performance when hyperthermic, but its effects on neural drive are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate head and neck cooling on thermal perception during whole-body hyperthermia on MVT, RTD, neural drive and the contractile properties of the muscle.

Method: 9 participants completed two trials in HOT conditions (50°C, 40% RH), involving light exercise before passive heating to a rectal temperature (Tre) of 39.5°C. During one trial, the head and neck was continuously cooled (HOTcool) using a towel soaked in ice water. At Tre=39.5°C neuromuscular measurements were completed to assess MVT, voluntary activation and EMG at MVT normalised to maximal M-wave. Voluntary RTD and normalised EMG were measured over 0-50, 0-100, 0-150 and 0-200 ms. Involuntary RTD at 0-50 ms was measured during evoked octets at 300 Hz. Thermoregulatory and perceptual variables were measured throughout.

Results: MVT and RTD, and their neuromuscular determinants were unaffected by cooling (P > 0.05). Neck (-20%) and head (-12%) temperature were lower in HOTcool, as were thermal sensation of the head (-36%) and body (-12%) and thermal comfort (body) (-23%). Time to target Tre was increased (71%) in HOTcool, and not all participants were able to reach 39.5°C. Tre (-0.3%) and skin temperature (-6%) were lower in HOTcool (P < 0.05), but heart rate was similar (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: head and neck cooling did not affect MVT, RTD, or the neuromuscular determinants of these functional variables despite improving perceptions of thermal strain.

Text
ICEE 2019_Abstract_Final_reviewed - Author's Original
Download (20kB)

More information

Published date: 7 July 2019
Venue - Dates: 18th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics, , Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2019-07-07 - 2019-07-12

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502752
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502752
PURE UUID: 75c92723-cd18-4bdf-b97a-26e89e08ef89
ORCID for Ralph Gordon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8441-9292

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jul 2025 16:30
Last modified: 09 Jul 2025 02:09

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ralph Gordon ORCID iD
Author: Neale Anthony Tillin
Author: Christopher James Tyler

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×